Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialisation: Comparison of Two European Policy Concepts

Author/s Ron Boschma
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/1
Language English Pages 18 P. 51-68 File size 632 KB
DOI 10.3280/SCRE2014-001004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper discusses two influential policy concepts at the European level that aim to promote economic diversification of regions, that is the Constructing Regional Advantage concept (CRA) and the Smart Specialisation concept (SS). Both policy frameworks identify and prioritise ‘promising’ targets for policy intervention, but they do so differently. The SS concept organizes this identification process through entrepreneurial discovery in which entrepreneurs select the domains of future specialisation. The CRA concept focuses on identifying related variety and bottlenecks that prevent related industries in regions to connect and interact. The paper argues that the two policy concepts can provide useful inputs to develop a smart and comprehensive policy design that focuses on true economic renewal in regions.

Keywords: Smart specialisation, constructing regional advantage, regional cohesion policy.

Jel codes: O25, O38, R11.

  1. Asheim B. T., Boschma R., Cooke P. (2011), Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases. Regional Studies, 45, 7: 893-904. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
  2. Asheim B., Coenen L., Moodysson J., Vang J. (2007), Constructing Knowledge-based Regional Advantage: Implications for Regional Innovation Policy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 7, 2/3/4/5: 140-155.
  3. Barca F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Independent report, pp. 1-219. (Last access October 2013 -
  4. Boschma R. (2009), Evolutionary Economic Geography and its Implications for Regional Innovation Policy. Paris: OECD.
  5. Boschma R. (2011), Regional Branching and Regional Innovation Policy. In: Kourtit K., Nijkamp P., Stough R. R. (eds.), Drivers of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Regional Dynamics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 359-368. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17940-2_17
  6. Boschma R., Frenken K. (2011), Technological Relatedness and Regional Branching. In: Bathelt H., Feldman M. P., Kogler D. F. (eds.), Beyond Territory, Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation and Innovation. London: Routledge. 64-81.
  7. Boschma R., Heimeriks G., Balland P.A. (2014), Scientific Knowledge Dynamics and Relatedness in Biotech Cities. Research Policy, 43, 1: 107-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.009
  8. Boschma R., Minondo A., Navarro M. (2012), Related Variety and Regional Growth in Spain. Papers in Regional Science, 91, 2: 241-256. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957-.2011.00387.
  9. Boschma R., Minondo A., Navarro M. (2013), The Emergence of New Industries at the Regional Level in Spain. A Proximity Approach Based on Product-relatedness. Economic Geography, 89, 1: 29-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01170.x
  10. Boschma R.A. (2004), Competitiveness of Regions from an Evolutionary Perspective. Regional Studies, 38, 9: 1001-1014. DOI: 10.1080/0034340042000292601
  11. Boschma R.A., Iammarino S. (2009), Related Variety, Trade Linkages and Regional Growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85, 3: 289-311. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287-.2009.01034.x
  12. Charron N., Lapuente V., Rothstein B., Varraish A., Hernandez M., Kazemi Veisari L., Dinescu M., Popovski D., Håkanssson J., Jonsson S., Morgado T., Borcan O. (2010), Measuring the Quality of Government and Subnational Variation. Report prepared for European Commission, DG Regional Policy and Directorate Policy Development by the research team at the Quality of Government Institute, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
  13. Colombelli A., Krafft J., Quatraro F. (2012), The Emergence of New Technology-based Sectors at the Regional Level: A Proximity-based Analysis of Nanotechnology. Utrecht: Utrecht University, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography n. 12.11.
  14. Cooke P. (2007), To Construct Regional Advantage from Innovation Systems First Build Policy Platforms, European Planning Studies 15, 2: 179-194. DOI: 10.1080/09654310601078671
  15. Essleztbichler J. (2013), Relatedness, Industrial Branching and Technological Cohesion in US Metropolitan Areas. Regional Studies. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2013.806793
  16. European Commission (2006), Constructing Regional Advantage. Principles, Perspectives, Policies. Final report for DG Research. Brussels: European Commission. (Last access October 2013 -
  17. Feldman J. (2007), The Managerial Equation and Innovation Platforms: The Case of Linköping and Berzelius Science Park. European Planning Studies, 15, 8: 1027-1045. DOI: 10.1080/09654310701448162
  18. Foray D., David P., Hall B. (2009), Smart Specialisation – The Concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief n. 9, June 2009. Brussels: European Commission.
  19. Foray D., David P., Hall B. H. (2011), Smart Specialisation: From Academic Idea to Political Instrument, the Surprising Career of a Concept and the Difficulties Involved in its Implementation. Lausanne: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, MTEI Working Paper n. 2011.001.
  20. Frenken K., van Oort F. G., Verburg T. (2007), Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth. Regional Studies, 41, 5: 685-697. DOI: 10.1080/00343400601120296
  21. Fritsch M., Stephan A. (2005), Regionalization of Innovation Policy. Introduction to the Special Issue. Research Policy 34, 8: 1123-1127. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.013
  22. Grabher G. (1993), The Wekness of Strong Ties. The Lock-in of Regional Development in the Ruhr-area. In: Grabher G. (ed.), The Embedded Firm. On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks. London: Routledge. 255-277.
  23. Harmaakorpi V. (2006), Regional Development Platform Method (RDPM) as a Tool for Regional Innovation Policy. European Planning Studies, 14, 8: 1085-1114. DOI: 10.1080/09654310600852399
  24. Harmaakorpi V., Tura T., Melkas H. (2011), Regional Innovation Platforms. In: Cooke P., Asheim B., Boschma R., Martin R., Schwartz D., Todtling F. (eds.), Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 556-572. DOI: 10.4337/9780857931504.00063
  25. Hassink R., Lagendijk A. (2001), The Dilemmas for Interregional Institutional Learning. Environment and Planning C. Government and Policy, 19, 1: 65-84. DOI: 10.1068/c9943
  26. Hausmann R., Rodrik D. (2003), Economic Development as Self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72, 2: 603-633. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X
  27. Howells J. (2005), Inno vation and Regional Economic Development. A Matter of Perspective?. Research Policy, 34, 8: 1220-1234. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.014
  28. Iammarino S., McCann P. (2006), The Structure and Evolution of Industrial Clusters. Transactions, Technology and Knowledge Spillovers. Research Policy, 35, 7: 1018-1036. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.004
  29. Lagendijk A. (2011), Regional Innovation Policy between Theory and Practice. In: Cooke P., Asheim B., Boschma R., Martin R., Schwartz D., Todtling F. (eds.), Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 597-608. DOI: 10.4337/9780857931504.00066
  30. Lambooy J., Boschma R. A. (2001), Evolutionary Economics and Regional Policy. Annals of Regional Science, 35, 1: 113-133. DOI: 10.1007/s001680000033
  31. McCann P., Barca F. (2011), Outcome Indicators and Targets. Towards a New System of Monitoring and Evaluation in EU Cohesion Policy, mimeo. (Last access October 2013 -
  32. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2011), Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to EU Cohesion Policy. Groningen: University of Groningen, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Economic Geography Working Paper 2011.
  33. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2013), Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to EU Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, forthcoming. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
  34. Metcalfe J. S. (2003), Equilibrium and Evolutionary Foundations of Competition and Technology Policy. New Perspectives on the Division of Labour and the Innovation Process. In: Pelikan P., Wegner G. (eds.), The Evolutionary Analysis of Economic Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 162-190.
  35. Metcalfe S. (1994), The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives. In: Dodgson M., Rothwell R. (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 409-512.
  36. Morgan K. (2013), The Regional State in the Era of Smart Specialisation. Ekonomiaz 83: 103-126. (Last access October 2013 -
  37. Neffke F., Henning M., Boschma R. (2011), How Do Regions Diversify Over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions. Economic Geography, 87, 3: 237-265. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
  38. Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA, London: The Belknap Press.
  39. OECD (2010), Regional Innovation Strategies. Paris: Oecd.
  40. OECD (2011), Regions and Innovation Policy, OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation. Paris: Oecd.
  41. Oughton C., Landabaso M., Morgan K. (2002), The Regional Innovation Paradox. Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 1: 97-110. DOI: 10.1023/A:1013104805703
  42. Pack H., Saggi K. (2006), The Case for Industrial Policy. A Critical Survey. Washington: World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper n. 3839.
  43. Rigby D. (2012), The Geography of Knowledge Relatedness and Technological Diversification in U.S. Cities. Utrecht: Utrecht University, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography n.12.18.
  44. Rigby D. L. (2013), Technological Relatedness and Knowledge Space: Entry and Exit of U.S. Cities from Patent Classes. Regional Studies. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2013.854878
  45. Rodrik D. (2004), Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge MA: Harvard University, Kennedy School of Management Working paper n. rwp04-047.
  46. Tanner A. N. (2011), The Place of New Industries: The Case of Fuel Cell Technology and Its Technological Relatedness to Regional Knowledge Bases. Utrecht: Utrecht University, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, n. 11.13.
  47. Tödtling F., Trippl M. (2005), One Size Fits All? Towards a Differentiated Regional Innovation Policy Approach. Research Policy 34, 8: 1203-1219. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
  48. van Oort F., de Geus S., Dogaru T. (2013), Related Variety and Regional Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of European Urban Regions. Utrecht: Utrecht University, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography n. 13.12.
  49. Wegner G. (1997), Economic Policy from an Evolutionary Perspective: A New Approach. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 153, 3: 463-509.

  • Regional innovation evolution and economic performance Roberta Capello, Camilla Lenzi, in Regional Studies /2019 pp.1240
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1502421
  • Outsmarting geography: implementing territorial innovation strategies in sparsely populated regions Alexandre Dubois, Iryna Kristensen, Jukka Teräs, in European Planning Studies /2017 pp.1316
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1320355
  • University technology transfer and the evolution of regional specialization: the case of Turin Alessandra Colombelli, Antonio De Marco, Emilio Paolucci, Riccardo Ricci, Giuseppe Scellato, in The Journal of Technology Transfer /2021 pp.933
    DOI: 10.1007/s10961-020-09801-w
  • Smart Specialization Policy in the EU: Relatedness, Knowledge Complexity and Regional Diversification Pierre Alexandre Balland, Ron A. Boschma, Joan Crespo, David L. Rigby, in SSRN Electronic Journal /2017
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2995986
  • Unpacking the U‐shaped relationship between related variety and firm sales: Evidence from Japan Ren Lu, Qing Song, Ting Xia, Daguo Lv, Torger Reve, Ze Jian, in Papers in Regional Science /2021 pp.1136
    DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12608
  • Persistence in regional learning paradigms and trajectories: consequences for innovation policy design Roberta Capello, Camilla Lenzi, in European Planning Studies /2016 pp.1587
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1177493
  • University-industry technology transfer within the context of RIS3 North of Portugal Ana Vanessa Marques, Carla Marques, Vitor Braga, Pedro Miguel Marques, in Knowledge Management Research & Practice /2019 pp.473
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2019.1589397
  • Place-based industrial strategies in the context of the Northern Ireland Protocol Graham Brownlow, Leslie Budd, in Regional Studies /2024 pp.409
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2023.2194332
  • Related and unrelated industry variety and the internationalization of start-ups Lucia Naldi, Giuseppe Criaco, Pankaj C. Patel, in Research Policy 104050/2020 pp.104050
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104050
  • The economic contribution of a recreational fishery in a remote rural economy John Curtis, Benjamin Breen, Paul O’Reilly, Cathal O’Donoghue, in Water Resources and Rural Development /2017 pp.14
    DOI: 10.1016/j.wrr.2017.11.001
  • Methodological approaches to integrated assessment of innovative environment of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation Sergei A. FILIN, Nikita A. REZAEV, in Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice /2021 pp.1104
    DOI: 10.24891/ea.20.6.1104
  • An institutionalist perspective on smart specialization: Towards a political economy of regional innovation policy Maximilian Benner, in Science and Public Policy /2022 pp.878
    DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scac035
  • Knowledge Space, Relatedness and Complexity: A Regional Analysis in Turkey Sedef AKGÜNGÖR, Mert ABAY, in Yildiz Social Science Review /2021 pp.123
    DOI: 10.51803/yssr.869824
  • El análisis de las diferencias en el proceso de transferencia de tecnología entre regiones Henry Caicedo Asprilla, in Cuadernos de Administración /2019 pp.163
    DOI: 10.11144/Javeriana.cao.31-56.adpt
  • The Knowledge–Innovation Nexus. Its Spatially Differentiated Returns to Innovation Roberta Capello, Camilla Lenzi, in Growth and Change /2015 pp.379
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.12098
  • La governance multilivello delle strategie macro-regionali dell'ue: note critiche Davide Gianluca Bianchi, in SCIENZE REGIONALI 1/2016 pp.5
    DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2016-001001
  • Smart Specialisation Strategies and regional knowledge spaces: how to bridge vision and reality Keungoui Kim, Chiara Ferrante, Dieter F. Kogler, in Regional Studies /2024 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2024.2355985
  • Capital ownership, innovation and regional development policy in the economic periphery: An energy industry case Calvin Jones, Max Munday, in Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit /2020 pp.545
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094220968048
  • Do EU regions benefit from Smart Specialisation principles? David L. Rigby, Christoph Roesler, Dieter Kogler, Ron Boschma, Pierre-Alexandre Balland, in Regional Studies /2022 pp.2058
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2022.2032628
  • Determining and systematizing metrics of the economic growth potential of rural areas: Considerations of the specifics of the international approach Anna A. KHRYSEVA, Ol'ga E. AKIMOVA, Irina A. MOROZOVA, in National Interests: Priorities and Security /2021 pp.1081
    DOI: 10.24891/ni.17.6.1081
  • Combining technological relatedness and sectoral specialization for improving prioritization in Smart Specialisation Anastasia Panori, Christina Kakderi, Ilias Dimitriadis, in Regional Studies /2022 pp.1454
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1988552
  • The Role of Network Topology and the Spatial Distribution and Structure of Knowledge in Regional Innovation Policy: A Calibrated Agent-Based Model Study Ben Vermeulen, Andreas Pyka, in Computational Economics /2018 pp.773
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-017-9776-3
  • Multilevel governance and Smart Specialization in EU regions: an evidence-based critical review Eristian Wibisono, in European Journal of Government and Economics /2022 pp.234
    DOI: 10.17979/ejge.2022.11.2.9004
  • Kamu Hizmetinde Yeni Konsept: Akıllı Kamu Hizmeti Lütfullah ÜN, in Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi /2022 pp.415
    DOI: 10.33399/biibfad.1130379
  • Digital meets smart: towards a technology-enhanced approach to Smart Specialisation Strategy development Luca Mora, Anastasia Panori, Mark Deakin, Raquel Ortega-Argiles, in Regional Studies /2022 pp.1421
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2022.2091775
  • Smart Specialisation Strategy and the New EU Cohesion Policy Reform: Introductory Remarks Roberto Capello, in SCIENZE REGIONALI 1/2014 pp.5
    DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001001
  • The impact of local knowledge bases on the creation of innovative start-ups in Italy Alessandra Colombelli, in Small Business Economics /2016 pp.383
    DOI: 10.1007/s11187-016-9722-0
  • Overcoming policy making problems in smart specialization strategies: engaging subregional governments Miren Estensoro, Miren Larrea, in European Planning Studies /2016 pp.1319
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1174670
  • The Etna macro‐region between peripheralization and innovation: Towards a smart territorial system based on tourism Arturo Di Bella, Gianni Petino, Luigi Scrofani, in Regional Science Policy & Practice /2019 pp.493
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12176
  • Innovation Networks for Regional Development Ben Vermeulen, pp.1 (ISBN:978-3-319-43939-6)
  • Intra and inter: regional knowledge spillovers in European Union Kleoniki Kalapouti, Nikos C. Varsakelis, in The Journal of Technology Transfer /2015 pp.760
    DOI: 10.1007/s10961-014-9356-9
  • Adapting a Circular Economy in Regional Strategies of the European Union Susanna Vanhamäki, Satu Rinkinen, Kati Manskinen, in Sustainability /2021 pp.1518
    DOI: 10.3390/su13031518
  • When regional innovation policies meet policy rationales and evidence: a plea for policy analysis Susana Borrás, Jacint Jordana, in European Planning Studies /2016 pp.2133
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1236074
  • Designing and Implementing a Smart Specialisation Strategy at Regional Level: Some Open Questions Donato Iacobucci, in SCIENZE REGIONALI 1/2014 pp.107
    DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001006
  • Seminal Studies in Regional and Urban Economics Roberto Camagni, Roberta Capello, pp.345 (ISBN:978-3-319-57806-4)
  • Industrial complexes in Mexico: implications for regional industrial policy based on related variety and smart specialization Amado Villarreal Gonzalez, Elizabeth A. Mack, Miguel Flores, in Regional Studies /2017 pp.537
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1114174
  • Which region to choose for an industrial policy? A research path to highlight restructuring opportunities Marco Capasso, Eric James Iversen, Antje Klitkou, Tore Sandven, in European Planning Studies /2019 pp.1461
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1588855
  • The potential of the chemical complex of Luhansk region: current state and prospects for structural modernization H. Shevtsova, N. Shvets, in Economic Herald of the Donbas /2019 pp.4
    DOI: 10.12958/1817-3772-2019-1(55)-4-15
  • Searching through the Haystack:The Relatedness and Complexity of Priorities in Smart Specialization Strategies Jason Deegan, Tom Broekel, Rune Dahl Fitjar, in Economic Geography /2021 pp.497
    DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2021.1967739
  • Policy learning and smart specialization: balancing policy change and continuity for new regional industrial paths: Table 1 Jerker Moodysson, Michaela Trippl, Elena Zukauskaite, in Science and Public Policy /2016 pp.scw071
    DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scw071
  • (De)industrialisation and lessons for industrial policy in Central and Eastern Europe Nebojša Stojčić, Zoran Aralica, in Post-Communist Economies /2018 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2018.1443251
  • Relatedness and connectivity in technological domains: missing links in S3 design and implementation Donato Iacobucci, Enrico Guzzini, in European Planning Studies /2016 pp.1511
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1170108
  • A Critical Review of the EU Smart Specialization and US Manufacturing Renaissance Policies and New Directions for Regional Industrial Policy in Korea 정준호, in Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea /2016 pp.782
    DOI: 10.23841/egsk.2016.19.4.782
  • Institutions, smart specialisation dynamics and policy Markus Grillitsch, in Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy /2016 pp.22
    DOI: 10.1177/0263774X15614694
  • Opportunities and challenges in implementing Smart Specialisation in Nordic ‘strong innovator’ regions Iryna Fil Kristensen, Rhiannon Pugh, in Regional Studies /2023 pp.129
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2022.2054975
  • Challenges with strategic placed-based innovation policy: implementation of smart specialization in Estonia and Wales Kaija Valdmaa, Rhiannon Pugh, Jaanus Müür, in European Planning Studies /2021 pp.681
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1767541
  • Smart Specialisation Strategies for Elevating Integration of Cultural Heritage into Circular Economy Jermina Stanojev, Christer Gustafsson, in Sustainability /2021 pp.3685
    DOI: 10.3390/su13073685
  • La ‘Smart Specialization Strategy' delle regioni italiane e le relazioni fra ambiti tecnologici Donato Iacobucci, Enrico Guzzini, in SCIENZE REGIONALI 3/2016 pp.5
    DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2016-003001
  • Who works in a working region? Inclusive innovation in the new manufacturing economy Nichola J. Lowe, Laura Wolf-Powers, in Regional Studies /2018 pp.828
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1263386
  • Socio-Spatial Theory in Nordic Geography Bjørn T. Asheim, Høgni Kalsø Hansen, Arne Isaksen, pp.147 (ISBN:978-3-031-04233-1)
  • How ‘Smart’ Are Smart Specialization Strategies? Marco Di Cataldo, Vassilis Monastiriotis, Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, in JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies /2022 pp.1272
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13156
  • Smart spesialisering – innovasjonspolitikk som industripolitikk for regional restrukturering Bjørn Terje Asheim, in Plan /2017 pp.20
    DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1504-3045-2017-02-05
  • Evaluating the implementation of Smart Specialisation policy Emanuela Marrocu, Raffaele Paci, David Rigby, Stefano Usai, in Regional Studies /2023 pp.112
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2022.2047915
  • Technological congruence and Smart Specialisation: evidence from European regions Cristiano Antonelli, Christophe Feder, Francesco Quatraro, in Spatial Economic Analysis /2023 pp.173
    DOI: 10.1080/17421772.2022.2100921
  • Smart economic development patterns in Europe: interaction with competitiveness Jurgita Bruneckienė, Jonas Rapsikevičius, Mantas Lukauskas, Ineta Zykienė, Robertas Jucevičius, in Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal /2023 pp.302
    DOI: 10.1108/CR-02-2021-0026
  • Smart specialisation in European regions: issues of strategy, institutions and implementation Mikel Landabaso, Philip McCann, Raquel Ortega-Argilés, in European Journal of Innovation Management /2014 pp.409
    DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-05-2014-0052
  • Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency Arne Isaksen, Stig-Erik Jakobsen, Rune Njøs, Roger Normann, in Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research /2019 pp.48
    DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322
  • Regional Branching and Key Enabling Technologies: Evidence from European Patent Data Sandro Montresor, Francesco Quatraro, in Economic Geography /2017 pp.367
    DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1326810
  • Innovation Policy for Grand Challenges. An Economic Geography Perspective Lars Coenen, Teis Hansen, Josephine V. Rekers, in Geography Compass /2015 pp.483
    DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12231
  • Innovation modes and entrepreneurial behavioral characteristics in regional growth Roberta Capello, Camilla Lenzi, in Small Business Economics /2016 pp.875
    DOI: 10.1007/s11187-016-9741-x
  • The Challenge of a Place-and Network-based Approach to Development in Italian Regions Massimo Arnone, Chiara Cavallaro, in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences /2016 pp.31
    DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.283
  • Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification Pierre-Alexandre Balland, Ron Boschma, Joan Crespo, David L. Rigby, in Regional Studies /2019 pp.1252
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
  • ‘Tecnologie abilitanti fondamentali' e ‘strategie di specializzazione intelligente'. Un'analisi regionale sulla base di brevetti Europei Anna D'Ambrosio, Sandro Montresor, Francesco Quatraro, in SCIENZE REGIONALI 3/2016 pp.47
    DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2016-003003
  • Smart concept in rural tourism: a comparison between two phases (2016-2019) Francisco Javier De la Ballina Ballina, in Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural e234629/2022
    DOI: 10.1590/1806-9479.2021.234629
  • Rural areas receptivity to innovative and sustainable agrifood processes. A case study in a viticultural territory of Central Spain Rocío Losada, Almudena Gómez‐Ramos, Margarita Rico, in Regional Science Policy & Practice /2019 pp.307
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12187
  • Strategic Deviance, Diversification and Enterprise Resilience in the Context of COVID-19: Heterogeneous Effect of Managerial Power Xiaoxu Kong, Fei Jiang, Xuexin Liu, in Emerging Markets Finance and Trade /2021 pp.1547
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2021.1904882
  • Spatial Co-location Patterns of Aerospace Industry Firms in Mexico Miguel Flores, Amado Villarreal, Saidi Flores, in Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy /2017 pp.233
    DOI: 10.1007/s12061-015-9180-0
  • Evrimsel Ekonomik Coğrafya Perspektifinden Türkiye’de Bölgelerin İlişkili Çeşitlilik Dinamiklerine Yönelik Ampirik Bir Analiz Leventcan GÜLTEKİN, Nuri YAVAN, Zühal KURUL, in Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi /2023 pp.616
    DOI: 10.33688/aucbd.1354132
  • Productive Ecosystems and the arrow of development Neave O’Clery, Muhammed Ali Yıldırım, Ricardo Hausmann, in Nature Communications 1479/2021
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21689-0
  • Technological Trends in the AI Economy Irina A. Morozova, Olga E. Akimova, Anna A. Khryseva, pp.71 (ISBN:978-981-19-7410-6)
  • Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization Erkki Karo, Rainer Kattel, Aleksandrs Cepilovs, pp.269 (ISBN:9780128041376)
  • Regional development platforms as incubators of business ecosystems. Case study: The Lahti urban region, Finland Vesa Harmaakorpi, Satu Rinkinen, in Growth and Change /2020 pp.626
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.12375
  • Unpacking the early alumni engagement of entrepreneurship graduates Ziad El-Awad, Jonas Gabrielsson, Jasna Pocek, Diamanto Politis, in Journal of Small Business Management /2024 pp.1219
    DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2022.2125979
  • Rethinking Irish cluster policy Chris van Egeraat, Eleanor Doyle, in Administration /2018 pp.107
    DOI: 10.2478/admin-2018-0011
  • FDI and regional development policy Simona Iammarino, in Journal of International Business Policy /2018 pp.157
    DOI: 10.1057/s42214-018-0012-1
  • Local knowledge composition and the emergence of entrepreneurial activities across industries: evidence from Italian NUTS-3 regions Alessandra Colombelli, Gianluca Orsatti, Francesco Quatraro, in Small Business Economics /2021 pp.613
    DOI: 10.1007/s11187-019-00192-3
  • Six critical questions about smart specialization Robert Hassink, Huiwen Gong, in European Planning Studies /2019 pp.2049
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898
  • Co-evolution patterns of university patenting and technological specialization in European regions Federico Caviggioli, Alessandra Colombelli, Antonio De Marco, Giuseppe Scellato, Elisa Ughetto, in The Journal of Technology Transfer /2023 pp.216
    DOI: 10.1007/s10961-021-09910-0
  • Does the Cohesion Policy Have the Same Influence on Growth Everywhere? A Geographically Weighted Regression Approach in Central and Eastern Europe Sebastien Bourdin, in Economic Geography /2019 pp.256
    DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2018.1526074
  • The early experience of smart specialization implementation in EU cohesion policy Philip McCann, Raquel Ortega-Argilés, in European Planning Studies /2016 pp.1407
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1166177
  • Leading Change in Communities Experiencing Economic Transition: Place Leadership, Expectations, and Industry Closure Andrew Beer, Markku Sotarauta, David Bailey, in Journal of Change Management /2023 pp.32
    DOI: 10.1080/14697017.2023.2164936
  • Foresight and the third mission of universities: the case for innovation system foresight Effie Amanatidou, Kalle Artturi Piirainen, Allan Dahl Andersen, Per Dannemand Andersen, in Foresight /2016 pp.24
    DOI: 10.1108/FS-04-2014-0026
  • Strategic management and regional industrial strategy: cross-fertilization to mutual advantage David Bailey, Christos Pitelis, Philip R. Tomlinson, in Regional Studies /2020 pp.647
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1619927
  • Seeking Economic Balance: Spatial Analysis of the Interaction Between Smart Specialisation and Diversification in Romanian Mountain Areas Alexandru-Sabin Nicula, Veronica Țaran-Baciu Georgescu , Emanuela-Adina Nicula , Matei Domnița , Bogdan-Nicolae Păcurar , in Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Geographia /2023 pp.37
    DOI: 10.24193/subbgeogr.2023.2.02
  • Scoperta imprenditoriale e strategie di specializzazione intelligente: dalla teoria alla pratica Alessandro Caramis, Livia Fay Lucianetti, in SCIENZE REGIONALI 3/2016 pp.67
    DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2016-003004
  • Relatedness, complexity and local growth Benjamin Davies, David C. Maré, in Regional Studies /2021 pp.479
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1802418
  • Cross-Border Cooperation Concept in Multifunctional Agriculture under RIS3 Christopher Meyer, Tim Oliver Howe, Christian Stollberg, Laima Gerlitz, in Environmental and Climate Technologies /2021 pp.537
    DOI: 10.2478/rtuect-2021-0039
  • Local development challenge in lagging-behind areas: insights from new & evolutionary economic geography Seyed Peyman Asadi, Ahmad Jafari Samimi, in GeoJournal /2022 pp.397
    DOI: 10.1007/s10708-022-10612-9

Ron Boschma, Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialisation: Comparison of Two European Policy Concepts in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 1/2014, pp 51-68, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001004