Clicca qui per scaricare

I segreti del welfare to work
Titolo Rivista: RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione 
Autori/Curatori: Francesco Giubileo 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2016 Fascicolo: 64 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  20 P. 53-72 Dimensione file:  1146 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIV2016-064004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Il Department for Work and Pensions attribuisce parte dei buoni risultati nel mercato del lavoro alla propria filosofia di intervento nelle politiche del lavoro, nota come Work first! Il contributo presenta l’evoluzione di tale filosofia in tema di servizi al lavoro realizzato in Gran Bretagna negli ultimi due decenni. La ricerca dopo aver presentato l’articolazione del modello di welfare-to-work si soffermerà, attraverso un’analisi secondaria, sulla valutazione d’impatto dei principali programmi di ricollocazione realizzati nel Regno Unito. La breve rassegna sui tali programmi assume un ruolo rilevante anche per il contesto italiano, in quanto nei prossimi mesi entrerà in vigore il "Contratto di ricollocazione", uno strumento che in diverse forme è stato già realizzato in Gran Bretagna dove non sono mancate una serie di criticità. Pertanto analizzare quali azioni sono state intraprese per risolvere tali criticità rappresenta un’informazione fondamentale anche per i servizi pubblici per l’impiego italiani.


Keywords: Centri per l’impiego; Politiche attive del lavoro; Work Programme; Shop around; Merlin Standard; Valutazione politiche del lavoro

  1. Bruttel, O. (2005a) Contracting-out and Governance Mechanisms in the Public Employment Services, Discussion Paper SP I 05-109, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin.
  2. Bruttel O. (2005b) Are Employment Zones Successful? Evidence From the First Four Years. Local Economy 20(4):389-403.Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin.
  3. Bredgaard T. e Larsen F. (2008) Quasi-markets in Employment Policy: Do they deliver on promises? Social Policy and Society, 7:3, p. 341-352.
  4. Bryna Sanger M. (2003) The Welfare Marketplace: Privatization and Welfare Reform, Center for Public Service, Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC.
  5. Cicciomessere R. e Sorcioni M. (2009) La collaborazione tra gli operatori pubblici e privati, Italialavoro, Link: www.italialavoro.it.
  6. Corden A. e Thornton P. (2003) Results-based Funded Supported Employment: Avoiding Disincentives to Serving People with Greatest Need, Social policy Research Unit, University of York.
  7. Cumming L. (2011) Payment-by-Outcome in Welfare to Work, 2020 Public Services Trust, London, Link: www.serco.com.
  8. Dewr, (2006) Customised Assistance, Job Search Training, Work for the Dole and Mutual Obligation - A Net Impact Study, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations, Canberra.
  9. Dwp, (2008) Department for Work and Pensions Commissioning Strategy, Cmnd 7330, London, The Stationery Office.
  10. Dwp, (2010) The Work Programme Framework, London, Department for Work and Pensions.
  11. European Commission, (2008) Biennial report on social services of general interest, Directorate-general for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Unit E.4, European Commission, Brussels.
  12. European Commission, (2009) The role of the Public Employment Services related to Flexicurity, in The European Labour Markets VC/2007/0927, March 2009, Cap. 3. Link: www.ec.europa.eu.
  13. Finn D., (2008) Welfare Markets‟: lessons from contracting out the delivery of welfare to work programmes in Australia and the Netherlands, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, Link: www.jrf.org.uk.
  14. Finn D., (2011) Sub-Contracting in Public Employment Services: Review of research findings and literature on recent trends and business models, European Commission, Brussels, Link: www.ec.europa.eu.
  15. Freud D., (2007) Reducing dependency, increasing opportunity: Options for the future of welfare to work: An independent report to the DWP, London.
  16. Giubileo F., (2012) Il welfare to work. Luci e ombre del welfare state britannico, Quaderni di sociologia, Rosenberg & Sellier Editori, Torino, vol. LVI, n. 59, pp. 139-148.
  17. Giubileo F., (2013) Il modello di welfare occupazionale in Lombardia, Emil Libri, www.ilibridiemil.it
  18. Griffiths, R. and Durkin, S., (2007) Synthesising the evidence on Employment Zones, Research report 449, Department for Work and Pensions, London. Link: www.research.dwp.gov.uk.
  19. Grubb, D., (2004) Principles for the performance management of public employment services.. Public Finance & Management 4(3): 352-398.
  20. Hales J., Taylor R., Mandy W. and Miller M., (2003) Evaluation of Employment Zones: Report on a Cohort Survey of Long-Term Unemployed People in the Zones and a Matched Set of Comparison Areas, National Centre for Social Research, London, Link: www.research.dwp.gov.uk.
  21. Heinrich, C. and Marschke, G., (2008) The Design and Dynamics of Performance Measurement Systems in the Public Sector, La Follette School Working Paper No. 2008-022, Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  22. Hudson M., Phillips J., Ray K., Vegeris S. and Davidson R., (2010) The influence of outcome-based contracting on Provider-led Pathways to Work, Research Report No 638, Department for Work and Pensions.
  23. Italialavoro, (2012) Politiche attive del lavoro, rapporto pubblico-privato e l’organizzazione dei servizi nel Regno Unito,Progetto Pon-Fse: Supporto alla Transnazionalità. Link: www.italialavoro.it .
  24. Italialavoro,(2014) Supporto alla Transnazionalità. Progetto Pon-Fse: Modelli avanzati di Profiling. Link: www.italialavoro.it .
  25. Kluve J., (2011) Le politiche attive del lavoro in Europa: una rassegna, in Cantalupi M. e Demurtas M. (a cura di), Politiche attive del lavoro, servizi per l’impiego e valutazione, Il Mulino, Bologna.
  26. Le Grand J., (2011) Quasi Market versus state provisions of Public Services, in Public Reason 3 (2): 80-89. Link: www.publicreason.ro.
  27. McConnell S., Burnwick A., Perez-Johnson I. and Winston P., (2003) Privatization in Practice: Case Studies of Contracting for TANF Case Management, Final Report prepared by Mathmatica Policy Research Inc. for the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington DC. Link: www.aspe.hhs.gov.
  28. Nao, (2010) Support to incapacity benefits claimants through Pathways to Work, National Audit Office, London.
  29. Nunn, A., Johnson S., et al., (2007) Job Outcome Target National Evaluation. DWP Research Report 462. Leeds, DWP Corporate Document Services.
  30. Nunn A., (2010) Performance management and neo-liberal labour market governance: the case of the UK. Reframing Corporate Social Responsibility: Lessons from the Global Financial Crisis. W. e. a. Sun. Bingley, Emerald.
  31. Nunn A., (2012) Performance management in public employment services, European Commission. Il document è disponibile su ec.europa.eu (aggiornato dicembre 2014).
  32. Nunn A. e Devins D., (2012), Process Evaluation of the Jobcentre Plus Performance Management Framework Norwhich, HMSO.
  33. Lam M., (2007) Performance measures for welfare-to-work programmes: The relevance of Australian star ratings to the UK, Work Directions UK, London.
  34. Rettore et al., (2002), La valutazione delle politiche del lavoro in presenza di selezione: migliorare la teoria,i metodi o i dati ?, Rivista di Politica economica, N. 3, 301-341.
  35. Sartori A., (2013) Servizi per l’impiego e politiche dell’occupazione in Europa. Idee e modelli per l’Italia, Maggioli Editore, Santarcangelo di Romagna (RN).
  36. Simmonds, D., (2011) Work Programme results: perform or bust. Working Brief, May 2010. London: Centre for Social and Economic Inclusion.
  37. Struyven L., (2004) Design Choices in Market Competition for Employment Services for the Long-term Unemployed, Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 21, OECD, Paris, Link: www.oecd.org.
  38. Sturgess G., Cumming L., Dicker J., Sotiropoulos A. and Sultan, N. (2011) Payment by Outcome: A Commissioner's Toolkit, 2020 Public Services Trust, London, , Link: www.clients.squareeye.net
  39. Thomas M. (2007) A review of developments in the Job Network, Parliamentary Library, Research Paper No. 15, Parliament of Australia, Canberra.
  40. Thuy P., Hansen E. and Price D. (2001) The Public Employment Service in a Changing Labour Market, International Labour Organisation.
  41. Timo Weishaupt J. (2011) Social Partners and the Governance of Public Employment Services: Trends and Experiences from Western Europe, Working Document Number 17, Labour Administration and Inspection Programme, International Labour Organization, Geneva, Link: www.ilo.org.
  42. Van Dooren W., Lonti Z., et al., (2007) Institutional Drivers of Efficiency in the Public Sector. V/PGC 16/AN.
  43. WPSC, (2010) Management and administration of contracted employment programme‟, Report of the Work and Pensions Committee, House of Commons, Session 2009–2010, HC 101, London: the Stationery Office, Link: www.publications.parliament.uk
  44. Wright S., Marston G. and McDonald C. (2011) The Role of Non-profit Organizations in the Mixed Economy of Welfare-to-Work in the UK and Australia, Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 299–318, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

Francesco Giubileo, in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 64/2016, pp. 53-72, DOI:10.3280/RIV2016-064004

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche