The concept of intruder in the sociology of consumption

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Author/s Mauro Ferraresi
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/132 Language Italian
Pages 12 P. 49-60 File size 255 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2013-132005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article explains that there are three types of intruder and the intruder in the sociology of consumption is a concept that coincides with the consumer and supports its main features. The consumer is an intruder, or rather a stranger, because refractory to the analysis and studies. This is not just an epistemological question, because the today consumer eludes us because of the system of consumption that has made us strangers to ourselves. That happens because the human being is rapidly changing technological and anthropological, and because he is now out of place in the world as demonstrated by the state of the placet, by the growing ecological crisis and by the issue of the sustainability. The opacity of the consumer testifies to the opacity of the society that is increasingly difficult to investigate unless the sociology of consumption uses new heuristic concepts useful to improve our understanding and the power of the search.

Keywords: Intruder, foreign, consumption mix, consumer, reflexivity, system

  1. Bauman Z. (2007), Homo Consumens, Trento: Erickson.
  2. Boccia Artieri G. (2012), Stati di Connessione. Pubblici, cittadini e consumatori nella (Social) Network Society, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  3. Brown, Lester, R. (2011), Piano B 4.0. Mobilitarsi per salvare la civiltà, Milano: Edizioni Ambiente.
  4. Codeluppi V. (2005), Manuale di sociologia del consumo, Roma: Carocci. Donati P. (2011), Sociologia della riflessività. Come si entra nel dopo-moderno, Bologna: il Mulino.
  5. Durkheim É. (1897), Il suicidio. Studio di sociologia, Milano: BUR Biblioteca Univ. Rizzoli, 2007.
  6. Fabris G. (2003), Il nuovo consumatore: verso il postmoderno, Milano: Franco-Angeli.
  7. Haraway D. (1991), “A Cyborg Manifesto. Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century”, in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: the reinvention of nature, New York: Routledge.
  8. Hawken P., Lovins A., Lovins Hunter L. (2001), Capitalismo naturale, Milano: Edizioni Ambiente.
  9. Hirsch F. (1981), I limiti sociali allo sviluppo, Milano: Bompiani.
  10. Jackson T. (2011), Prosperità senza crescita, Milano: Edizioni Ambiente.
  11. Klein N. (2001), No logo, Milano: Rizzoli.
  12. Meadows D. & D., Randers J. (2006), I nuovi limiti dello sviluppo, Milano: Mondadori.
  13. Nancy, J.-L. (2000), L’intruso, a cura di Valeria Piazza, Napoli: Cronopio, 2000; L’Intrus, Paris: Galilée.
  14. Nichols S. (1988), “Post-Human Manifesto”, Games Monthly magazine.
  15. Paltrinieri R. (2004), Consumi e Globalizzazione, Roma: Carocci.
  16. Pireddu M., Tursi A. (a cura di) (2006), Post-umano. Relazioni tra uomo e tecnologia nella società delle reti, Milano: Guerini e Associati.
  17. Rifkin J. (2001), Ecocidio, Milano: Mondadori.
  18. Santambrogio A. (2003), Introduzione alla sociologia della diversità, Roma: Carocci.
  19. Simmel G. (1908), Lo straniero, Milano: Il segnalibro, 2006.
  20. Wuppertal Institute (2011), Futuro sostenibile, Milano: Edizioni Ambiente.

Mauro Ferraresi, La figura dell’intruso nella sociologia del consumo in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 132/2013, pp 49-60, DOI: 10.3280/SL2013-132005