L'arte del controesame e le anomalie dell'Italian Style

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Autori/Curatori Ennio Amodio
Anno di pubblicazione 2008 Fascicolo 2008/2 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 14 P. 155-168 Dimensione file 142 KB
DOI
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The Art of Cross-examination and the Anomalies of the Italian Style - The first Italian edition of Francis L. Wellman’s famous work The Art of Cross- Examination is in the process of being published as we go to press. Presenting it to Italian readers, this article highlights the present-day pertinence of the book authored by a New York attorney more than a century ago. The result of his practical forensic experience and enriched by excerpts from the works of other eminent attorneys, the volume is a veritable goldmine of the rules to apply in building an effective counterbalance to the declarations of the witnesses fielded by the counterpart. As Wellman describes how to go about conducting a cross-examination without any particular order, this article compiles the various rules and classifies them in a triple sequence: how to prepare a cross-examination, how to formulate the questions and how to behave when listening to the witness’ testimony. The article closes with a comparison between the Anglo-American model and Italian practice. In the Italian style, the freedom of cross-examination is restricted by the interference of the judge, who refuses to play the passive role of a mere arbitrator. In addition, attorneys and prosecutors have not yet learned to perceive cross-examination as an activity that shapes the evidence for the purpose of convincing the judge.;

Ennio Amodio, L'arte del controesame e le anomalie dell'Italian Style in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 2/2008, pp 155-168, DOI: