The risk of risk society and limits of law

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Autori/Curatori Raffaele De Giorgi
Anno di pubblicazione 2009 Fascicolo 2009/2 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 9 P. 59-67 Dimensione file 50 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2009-002004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The Risk of Risk Society and the Limits of Law - What is represented as risk in the risk society? Does this question concern the operations of society’s structure, or does it concern the semantics through which society observes itself? And finally, can law reduce risk, or is it a risk-factor in itself? The theoretical perspective proposed in this essay is the one offered by Luhmann’s theory of society. Indeed, only this perspective enables us to deconstruct current representations of risk and the legal system and to advance a description more attuned to the complexity of modern society. The article’s main hypothesis is that risk is a structural feature of modern society’s complexity. Risk is built in the process of temporalisation of modern society, in its symbiosis with the future, in the paradoxical nature of the present, and in the ecology of non-knowledge. Both risk and law are techniques aimed at constraining time while reducing uncertainty and non-knowledge about the future. Modern society treats the future as a risk that depends on decisions. In turn, modern law’s self-recognition relies upon its capacity to control risk. However, the author argues that this process is highly problematic and risky. In fact, law cannot forbid, stop, or prevent risk: it can only resort to strategies aimed at reducing the riskiness of the juridical treatment of risk.

  • Judicial Response to Ecological Environment Risk in China—From the Perspective of Social Systems Theory Tian Sang, Peng Liu, Liang Zhao, in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health /2022 pp.14355
    DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114355
  • Beyond Uncertainties in the Sharing Economy: Opportunities for Social Capital Mariana Zuleta Ferrari, in European Journal of Risk Regulation /2016 pp.664
    DOI: 10.1017/S1867299X00010102
  • Governare il futuro. Materiali per una sociologia giuridica del rischio Giuseppe Campesi, in SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO 2/2015 pp.35
    DOI: 10.3280/SD2014-002002
  • Regulating Undercover Law Enforcement: The Australian Experience Brendon Murphy, pp.187 (ISBN:978-981-33-6380-9)
  • Regulating Undercover Law Enforcement: The Australian Experience Brendon Murphy, pp.261 (ISBN:978-981-33-6380-9)

Raffaele De Giorgi, The risk of risk society and limits of law in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 2/2009, pp 59-67, DOI: 10.3280/SD2009-002004