When the analyst is a "new bad object": analytic treatment between repetition compulsion and opening to change

Author/s Steven H. Cooper
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/2 Language Italian
Pages 20 P. 85-104 File size 238 KB
DOI 10.3280/RPR2013-002006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The seminar intends to stimulate a reflection on the self-reflective aspects of the analyst’s participation in the process. In particular, with the help some clinical examples, the discussion focuses on the inevitable re-proposition by the analyst of the familiar relational models on which the patient structured his internal world. Because of elements of his own personality, the analyst might re-propose himself as a “new bad object”, i.e. a disapproving and disconfirming object (Fairbairn), and might have to engage a fight with himself in order not to be trapped in the role of the ancient object. Steven Cooper, who discussed these themes in his 2010 book, A disturbance in the field, states that the patient emotionally perceives the flows of the analyst’s internal fight and, for this reason, the analytic couple can understand repetition if the analyst is able to maintain a constant self-reflective position. This is an important part of therapeutic action. Follows a wide-ranging historical review of the concept of therapeutic action in relation to the analyst’s inevitable limits in performing his role.

Keywords: Bad object, self-reflectivity, repetition compulsion, changing, psychoanalytic process, relational patterns

  1. Balint M. (1965). Trad. it.: L’amore primario. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1991
  2. Bion W. R. (1963). Trad. it.: Gli elementi della psicoanalisi. Roma: Armando, 1988
  3. Britton R. and Steiner J. (1994). Interpretation: Selected Fact or Overvalued Idea? International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 75: 1069-1078
  4. Britton R. (1998). Belief and Imagination. NY: Routledge
  5. Bromberg P. M. (1998). Standing in the Spaces. Essays on Clinical Process, Trauma and Dissociation. NY: The Analytic Press, Inc
  6. Cooper S.H., Levit D.B. (1998). Old and New Objects in Fairbairnian and American Relational Theory. Psychoanal. Dial., 8: 603-624 DOI: 10.1080/10481889809539279
  7. Cooper S.H. (1998). Analyst Subjectivity, Analyst Disclosure, and the Aims of Psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Q., 67:379-406.
  8. Cooper S.H. (2000a). Mutual Containment in the Analytic Situation. Psychoanal. Dial., 10:169-194 DOI: 10.1080/10481881009348529
  9. Cooper S.H. (2000b). Illuminating the Shadows in the Spaces: A Review of Standing in the Spaces by Philip Bromberg. Hillsdale. Contemp. Psychoanal., 36: 143-148.
  10. Cooper S.H. (2004). State of the Hope: The New Bad Object in the Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dial., 14: 527-551 DOI: 10.1080/10481880409353126
  11. Cooper P.C. (2008). Being the Moment. Psychoanal. Rev., 95: 285-303 DOI: 10.1521/prev.2008.95.2.285
  12. Cooper S. H. (2010a). A Disturbance in the Field: Essays in Tranference-Countertransference. NY: Routledge
  13. Cooper S.H. (2010). An Elusive Aspect of the Analyst's Relationship to Transference. Psychoanal Q., 79: 349-380 DOI: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2010.tb00451.x
  14. Corbett K. (2001). Faggot = Loser. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 2: 3-28 DOI: 10.1080/15240650209349168
  15. Davies J.M. (2004). Whose Bad Objects Are We Anyway?: Repetition and Our Elusive Love Affair with Evil. Psychoanal. Dial., 14: 711-732 DOI: 10.1080/10481881409348802
  16. De Beistegui M. (2010). Per un’estetica della metafora. In: Ferrari P. e Godani D., a cura di, La sartoria di Proust. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
  17. Fairbairn W. R. (1952). Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  18. Feldman M. (1997). Projective Identification: The Analyst’s Involvement. Int. J. Psycho- Anal., 78:227-241
  19. Freud S. (1909). Trad. it.: Cinque conferenze sulla psicoanalisi. Opere di Sigmund Freud, vol. VI. Torino: Boringhieri, 1974
  20. Hoffman I. Z. (1983). Trad. it.: Il paziente come interprete dell’esperienza dell’analista. In: Rituale e spontaneità in psicoanalisi. Roma: Astrolabio, 2000.
  21. Joseph, B. (1985). Transference: The Total Situation. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 66:447-454.
  22. Josephs L. (1997). Accessibility To Awareness And The Transference Of Authority. Contemp. Psychoanal., 33: 43-70.
  23. Kavka J. (1976). The Analysis of Phallic Narcissism. Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 3: 277-282.
  24. Kohut H. (1984). Trad. it.: La cura psicoanalitica. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1986
  25. Loewald H. (1960). Trad. it.: L’azione terapeutica della psicoanalisi. In: Riflessioni psicoanalitiche. Milano: Dunod, 1999
  26. Mitchell S. A. (1991). Trad. it.: Prospettive contemporanee sul Sé: verso un’integrazione. In: Mitchell S. A., Menarini R., Ancona L. et al., Le matrici relazionali del Sé. Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico, 1992
  27. Mitchell S. A. (1997). Trad. it.: Influenza e autonomia in psicoanalisi. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1999.
  28. O’Shaughnessy E. (1992). Enclaves and Excursions. International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 73(4): 603-614
  29. Racker H. (1968). Trad. it.: Studi sulla tecnica psicoanalitica. Roma: Armando, 1970
  30. Rosenfeld H. (1987). Trad. it.: Comunicazione e interpretazione. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1989.
  31. Sandler J. (1976). Countertransference and Role-Responsiveness. Int. Rev. Psycho-Anal., 3.
  32. Slavin M.O., Kriegman D. (1998). Why the Analyst Needs to Change: Toward a Theory of Conflict, Negotiation and Mutual Influence in the Therapeutic Process. Psychoanal. Dial., 8: 247-284. DOI: 10.1080/10481889809539246
  33. Steiner R. (1993). The Freud Klein Controversies. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 74: 179-179.
  34. Steiner J. (2006). Interpretative Enactments and the Analytic Setting. Int. Psycho-Anal., 87: 315-320
  35. Steiner J. (2011). Helplessness and the Exercise of Power in the Analytic Session. Int. Psycho- Anal., 92: 135-147.
  36. Strachey J. (1934). Trad. it.: La natura dell’interpretazione terapeutica della psicoanalisi. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, 20, 1974.
  37. Tuckett D. (1997). New Directions In This And Future Issues. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 78: 215- 218.
  38. Winnicott D. W. (1965). Trad. it.: Sviluppo affettivo e ambiente. Roma: Armando, 1970
  39. Winnicott D. W. (1969). Trad. it.: L’uso di un oggetto e l’entrare in rapporto attraverso identificazioni. In: Gioco e realtà. Roma: Armando, 1983

Steven H. Cooper, Quando l’analista è un "nuovo oggetto cattivo": la cura analitica tra coazione a ripetere e apertura al cambiamento in "RICERCA PSICOANALITICA" 2/2013, pp 85-104, DOI: 10.3280/RPR2013-002006