La relazione allenatore-atleta in adolescenza: implicazioni per il benessere percepito. Uno studio qualitativo

Titolo Rivista PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE
Autori/Curatori Silvia Scotto di Luzio, Fortuna Procentese, Emma Guillet-Descas
Anno di pubblicazione 2014 Fascicolo 2014/1 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 23 P. 50-72 Dimensione file 785 KB
DOI 10.3280/PDS2014-001003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

I diversi contesti relazionali in cui si svolgono le attività sportive a livello agonistico e, in particolare, il comportamento e lo stile interpersonale dell’allenatore svolgono un ruolo fondamentale nel plasmare i potenziali effetti psicologici, emotivi e fisici (sia positivi che negativi) della partecipazione sportiva in adolescenza. Obiettivo del presente lavoro è stato esplorare il processo di costruzione e di sviluppo della relazione allenatore-atleta e le ripercussioni della qualità di tale relazione sul benessere personale percepito dai protagonisti. A tal fine, sono stati intervistati 50 atleti adolescenti e 21 allenatori, provenienti da società sportive campane. Le interviste, trascritte verbatim, sono state analizzate attraverso l’approccio della Grounded Theory. Dall’analisi sono emerse 13 categorie raggruppate in 3 macro aree concettuali: 1) Ruoli e compiti nella relazione allenatore-atleta. 2) La vittoria: punto di arrivo o punto di partenza? 3) L’evoluzione della relazione in rapporto ai sistemi di riferimento. La core category individuata è Benefici della relazione: dalla solitudine alla condivisione. Dalla lettura del fenomeno emergono due diversi stili interattivi che caratterizzano la relazione allenatore-atleta, che sono fortemente influenzati dal significato simbolico attribuito al concetto di vittoria e influiscono sulla percezione di benessere e di partecipazione. È stata inoltre individuata una dimensione di profonda solitudine, legata alla percezione di una difficoltà nel ritagliare uno spazio e un tempo dedicati alla riflessione e al dialogo rispetto alla natura della relazione stessa. Ciò rimanda alla necessità di teorizzare ed intervenire sulla percezione dei contesti relazionali in un’ottica di prevenzione del drop-out e di promozione del benessere.;

Keywords:Relazione allenatore-atleta, benessere percepito, sport, adolescenza, Self determination Theory

  1. Adie J. and Jowett S. (2010). Athletes’ meta-perceptions of the coach-athlete relationship, multiple achievement goals and intrinsic motivation among track and field athletes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40: 2750-2773. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00679.
  2. Antonini Philippe R. and Seiler R. (2006). Closeness, co-orientation, and complementarity in coach-athlete relationships: What male swimmers say about their male coaches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7: 159-172. DOI: 10.1080/1612197X.2007.967183
  3. Antonini Philippe R., Sagar S.S., Huguet S., Paquet Y. and Jowett S. (2011). From teacher to friend: The evolving nature of the coach-athlete relationship. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 42 (1): 1-23.
  4. Barber B.L., Stone M.R. and Eccles J.S. (2005). Adolescent participation in organized activities. In: Moore K., editor, Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development: What do children need to flourish? New York: Springer, pp. 133-146.
  5. Berscheid E., Snyder M. and Omoto A.M. (1989). The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 792-807. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.79
  6. Blanchard C. M., Amiot C. E., Perreault S., Vallerand R. J. and Provencher P. (2009). Cohesiveness, coach’s interpersonal style and psychological needs: their effects on self-determination and athletes’ subjective well-being. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10: 545-551. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.02.00
  7. Bonino S., Cattelino E. e Ciairano S. (2003). Adolescenti e rischio [Adolescents and risk]. Firenze: Giunti.
  8. Corbin J. and Strauss A. (1990). Grounded theory method: Procedures, canons, and evaluative procedures. Qualitative Sociology, 13 (1): 3-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF0098859
  9. Cummings M. L., Myers K. and Scott S. D. (2006). Modified Cooper Harper evaluation tool for unmanned vehicle displays Proceedings of UVS Canada: Conference on Unmanned Vehicle Systems Canada. Canada, PQ: Montebello.
  10. Duda J.L. (2001). Achievement goal research in sport: pushing the boundaries and clarifying some misunderstandings. In: Roberts G.C., editor, Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics, pp. 129-182.
  11. Eime R. M. and Payne W. R. (2009). Linking participants in school-based sport programs to community clubs. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12: 293-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.11.00
  12. Flick U. (1998). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
  13. Fontana A. and Frey J.H. (2005). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In: Denzin N.K. and Lincoln Y.S., editors, Handbook of qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, pp. 645-672.
  14. Gould D., Udry E., Tuffey S. and Loehr J. (1996). Burnout in competitive junior tennis players: I. A quantitative psychological assessment. The Sport Psychologist, 10: 322-340.
  15. Gustafsson H., Kenttä G., Hassmén P. and Lundqvist C. (2007). Prevalence of burnout in competitive adolescent athletes. The Sport Psychologist, 21: 21-37.
  16. Hollembeak J. and Amorose A. J. (2005). Perceived coaching behaviors and college athletes’intrinsic motivation: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17: 20-36. DOI: 10.1080/1041320059090754
  17. Isoard-Gautheur S., Oger M., Guillet E. and Martin-Krumm C. (2010). Validation of a French version of the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire: Le questionnaire du Burnout Sportif (QBS) in Competitive Sport and Physical Education Context. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26 (3): 203-211. DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a00002
  18. Jowett S. (2005). On repairing and enhancing the coach-athlete relationship. In: Jowett S. and Jones M., editors, The psychology of coaching. Leicester, UK: The British Psychological Society, Sport and Exercise Psychology Division, pp. 14-6.
  19. Jowett S. (2007). Interdependence analysis and the 3 + 1Cs in the coach-athlete relationship. In: Jowett S. and Lavallee D., editors, Social psychology in sport Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 15-27.
  20. Jowett S. and Chaundy V. (2004). An investigation into the impact of coach leadership and coach-athlete relationship on group cohesion. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8: 302-311. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2699.8.4.30
  21. Jowett S. and Cockerill I. M. (2003). Olympic medallists’ perspective of the athlete-coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4: 313-331. DOI: 10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00011-
  22. Jowett S. and Frost T. C. (2007). Race/ethnicity in the all male coach-athlete relationship: Black footballers’ narratives. Journal of International Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3: 255-269.
  23.  Jowett S. and Nezlek J. B. (2012). Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach-athlete dyads. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29: 287-301. DOI: 10.1177/026540751142098
  24. Jowett S., O’Broin A. and Palmer S. (2011). On understanding the role and significance of a key two-person relationship in sport and executive coaching. Sport & Exercise Psychology Review, 6: 19-30.
  25. Jowett S. and Poczwardowski A. (2007). Understanding the coach-athlete relationship. In: Jowett S. and Lavallee D., editors, Social psychology in sport Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 3-14.
  26. Lafrenière M.-A.K., Jowett S., Vallerand R.J., Donahue E.G. and Lorimer R. (2008). Passion in sport: on the quality of the coacheathlete relationship. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30: 541-560.
  27. Laure P. and Binsinger C. (2009). Chronic diseases and elite athletes: an epidemiological review. Medicina Sportiva, 13: 245-250. DOI: 10.2478/v10036-009-0038-
  28. Le Menestrel S. and Perkins D.F. (2007). An overview of how sports, out-of-school time, and youth well-being can and do intersect. New Directions for Youth Development, 115: 13-25. DOI: 10.1002/yd.22
  29. Lorimer R. and Jowett S. (2009). Empathic accuracy, meta-perspective, and satisfaction in the coach-athlete relationship. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21: 201-212. DOI: 10.1080/1041320090277728
  30. Mageau G.A. and Vallerand R.J. (2003). The coach-athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Science, 21: 883-904. DOI: 10.1080/026404103100014037
  31. Myers N.D. and Feltz D.L. (2007). From self-efficacy to collective efficacy in sport: Transitional methodological issues. In: Tenenbaum G. and Eklund R.C., editors, The handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley, pp. 799-819.
  32. Morse J.M. (2008). “What’s your favourite colour?” Reporting Irrelevant Demographics in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 18: 299-300.
  33. Muhr T. and Friese S. (2004). User’s Manual for ATLAS.ti 5.0, 2nd Edition. Berlin: Scientific Software Development.
  34. Nix G., Ryan R.M., Manly J.B. and Deci E.L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35: 266-284. DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1999.138
  35. Noblet A.J. and Gifford S.M. (2002). The sources of stress experienced by professional Australian footballers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14: 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/1041320020933900
  36. Ntoumanis N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71: 225-242. DOI: 10.1348/00070990115849
  37. Nussbaum M.C. and Sen A. (1993). The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  38. Poczwardowski A., Barott J.E. and Henschen K.P. (2002). The athlete and coach: Their relationship and its meaning. Results of an interpretive study. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 33: 116-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.08.00
  39. Raedeke T.D. (1997). Is athlete burnout more than just stress? A sport commitment perspective. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 19: 396-417.
  40. Reinboth M., Duda J.L. and Ntoumanis N. (2004). Dimensions of coaching behavior, need satisfaction, and the psychological and physical welfare of young athletes. Motivation and Emotion, 28: 297-313.
  41. Ryan R.M. and Deci E.L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. In: Fiske S., editor, Annual review of psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc., pp. 141-166.
  42. Sarrazin P., Vallerand R.J., Guillet E., Pelletier L.G. and Cury F. (2002). Motivation and dropout in female handballers: a 21-month prospective study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32: 395-418. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.9
  43. Scotto di Luzio S. e Procentese F. (2011). Benessere in adolescenza: lo sport come fattore di protezione dai comportamenti a rischio nelle comunità locali [Wellbeing in adolescence: sport as a protection factor from risky behaviors in local communities]. Il Giornale Italiano di Psicologia dello Sport, 10 (1): 34-41.
  44. Smith R.E. and Smoll F. L. (2007). Social-cognitive approach to coaching behaviors. In: Jowett S. and Lavallee D., editors, Social Psychology in Sport. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 75-90.
  45. Smoll F.L. and Smith R.E. (2002). Coaching behavior research and intervention in youth sports. In: Smoll F.L. and Smith R.E., editors, Children and youth in sport: A biopsychosocial perspective (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, pp. 211-233.
  46. Standage M., Duda J.L. and Ntoumanis N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. The British Psychological Society, 75: 411-433. DOI: 10.1348/000709904X2235
  47. Strauss A. and Corbin J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  48. Sussman S., Pokhrel P., Ashmore R.D. and Brown B.B. (2007). Adolescent peer group identification and characteristics: A review of the literature. Addictive Behaviors, 32: 1602-1627. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.11.01
  49. Vallerand R. J. and Houlfort N. (2003). Passion at work: toward a new conceptualization. In: Skarlicki D., Gilliland S. and Steiner D., editors, Emerging perspectives of values in organizations. Social issues in management, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 175-204.
  50. Vallerand R.J., Mageau G.A., Elliot A.J., Dumais A., Demers M.-A. and Rousseau F. (2008). Passion and performance attainment in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9: 373-392. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.05.00
  51. Vallerand R.J. and Miquelon P. (2007). Passion for sport in athletes. In: Lavallee D. and Jowett S., editors, Social psychology in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 249-263.
  52. Waterman A.S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64: 678-691. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.67

  • Construction and validation of the Sport Sense of Community in Adolescence Questionnaire (SSCAQ) Silvia Scotto di Luzio, Emma Guillet‐Descas, Fortuna Procentese, Guillaume Martinent, in Journal of Community Psychology /2017 pp.783
    DOI: 10.1002/jcop.21892
  • Families and Social Media Use: The Role of Parents’ Perceptions about Social Media Impact on Family Systems in the Relationship between Family Collective Efficacy and Open Communication Fortuna Procentese, Flora Gatti, Immacolata Di Napoli, in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health /2019 pp.5006
    DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16245006
  • Protective and risk social dimensions of emergency remote teaching during COVID‐19 pandemic: A multiple mediation study Fortuna Procentese, Flora Gatti, Emiliano Ceglie, in Journal of Community Psychology /2023 pp.67
    DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22879
  • Academic Community in the Face of Emergency Situations: Sense of Responsible Togetherness and Sense of Belonging as Protective Factors against Academic Stress during COVID-19 Outbreak Fortuna Procentese, Vincenza Capone, Daniela Caso, Anna Donizzetti, Flora Gatti, in Sustainability /2020 pp.9718
    DOI: 10.3390/su12229718
  • People‐nearby applications and local communities: Questioning about individuals’ loneliness and social motivations toward people‐nearby applications Fortuna Procentese, Flora Gatti, in Journal of Community Psychology /2019 pp.1282
    DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22175

Silvia Scotto di Luzio, Fortuna Procentese, Emma Guillet-Descas, La relazione allenatore-atleta in adolescenza: implicazioni per il benessere percepito. Uno studio qualitativo in "PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE" 1/2014, pp 50-72, DOI: 10.3280/PDS2014-001003