La misurazione delle performance dei servizi domiciliari e residenziali tra riforme istituzionali e applicazioni locali

Journal title MECOSAN
Author/s Antonella Cifalinò, Irene Eleonora Lisi
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/93
Language Italian Pages 24 P. 9-32 File size 1017 KB
DOI 10.3280/MESA2015-023002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Literature reports contrasting findings concerning the impacts generated by the introduction, driven by legislative reforms, of performance measurement systems in the public sector. Given the ever growing relevance of primary care services within the Italian NHS, this study was aimed at exploring the construction and the potential managerial use of a primary care performance measurement system set down to comply with institutional accountability requirements. This purpose was pursued through an empirical investigation, promoted by the Italian Health Ministry and conducted in collaboration with four local health units, aimed at theoretically developing and empirically testing a performance measurement system based on data contained in the ministerial flows regarding homecare and residential care services. Results demonstrate the feasibility, reliability, and relevance of the proposed system and identify several factors that may facilitate - or obstacle - its actual use.

Keywords: Performance measurement systems, accountability, facilitating/ impeding factors, homecare, residential care, constructive research approach.

  1. Kurunmaki L., Miller P. (2011). Regulatory hybrids: Partnerships, budgeting and modernizing government, Management Accounting Research, 22: 220-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2010.08.004
  2. Agenas (2012). La presa in carico degli anziani non autosufficienti. I quaderni di Monitor, 30 (10° supplemento). Anessi Pessina E., Cantu E. (a cura di) (2000-2010). L’aziendalizzazione della sanità in Italia. Rapporto OASI. Milano: Egea.
  3. Arah O.A., Westert G.P., Hurst J., Klazinga N.S. (2006). A conceptual framework for the OECD
  4. health care quality indicators projects. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 18 (1): 5-13. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl024
  5. Bodenheimer T. (2003). Interventions to Improve Chronic Illness Care: Evaluating Their Effectiveness. Disease Management, 6 (2): 63-71. DOI: 10.1089/109350703321908441
  6. Borgonovi E. (2000). Prefazione. In Casati G. Programmazione e controllo di gestione nelle aziende sanitarie. Milano: McGraw-Hill.
  7. Borgonovi E. (2005). Principi e sistemi aziendali per le amministrazioni pubbliche. Milano: Egea. Bourne M., Neely A., Platts K., Mills J. (2002). The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22 (11): 1288-1310. DOI: 10.1108/01443570210450329
  8. Brunsson N., Lapsley I., Miller P. (1998). Editorial: constructing health care accountants: melding calculation and care. Management Accounting Research, 9: 31-5. DOI: 10.1006/mare.1998.0070
  9. Casati G. (2000). Programmazione e controllo di gestione nelle aziende sanitarie. Milano: McGraw-Hill.
  10. Chang L. (2007). The NHS performance assessment framework as a balanced scorecard approach. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(2): 101-17. DOI: 10.1108/09513550710731472
  11. Cifalino A. (a cura di) (2007). Il governo dei servizi sanitari territoriali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  12. Cinquini L., Vainieri M. (2008). Measuring primary care services performance: issues and opportunities from a home care pilot experience in the Tuscan health system. Health Services Management Research, 21: 199-210. DOI: 10.1258/hsmr.2007.007024
  13. Commissione Nazionale per la Definizione e l’Aggiornamento dei Livelli Essenziali di Assistenza. Nuova caratterizzazione dell’assistenza territoriale domiciliare e degli interventi ospedalieri a domicilio. Commissione Nazionale per la Definizione e l’Aggiornamento dei Livelli Essenziali di Assistenza. Prestazioni Residenziali e Semiresidenziali.
  14. DeGroff A., Schooley M., Chapel T., Poister T.H. (2010). Challenges and strategies in applying performance measurement to federal public health programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33: 365-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.02.003
  15. Del Vecchio M. (2001). Dirigere e governare le amministrazioni pubbliche. Milano: Egea. Doolin B. (1999). Casemix management in a New Zealand hospital: rationalisation and resistance. Financial Accountability & Management, 15 (3-4): 397-417. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0408.00091
  16. Eisenhardt K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532-50. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385
  17. Fattore G. (2012). Rilevanza e complessita delle istituzioni pubbliche. In Borgonovi E., Fattore G., Longo F. (a cura di). Management delle istituzioni pubbliche. Milano: Egea.
  18. FilipeAmado C.A., Dyson R.G. (2008). On comparing the performance of primary care providers. European Journal of Operational Research, 185: 915–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.02.052
  19. Fottler M.D., Erickson E., Rivers P.A. (2006). Bringing human resources to the table: Utilization
  20. of an HR balanced scorecard at Mayo Clinic. Health Care Management Review, 31(1): 64-72. DOI: 10.1097/00004010-200601000-00009
  21. Hood C. (1995). The New Public Management in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20 (2-3): 93-109. DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.HumphreyC.,MillerP.(2012).Rethinkingimpac
  22. and redefining responsibility – The parameters and coordinates of accounting and public management reforms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(2): 295-327. DOI: 10.1108/09513571211198773
  23. Jacobs K. (1998). Costing health care: a study of the introduction of cost and budget reports into a GP association. Management Accounting Research, 9 (1): 55-70. DOI: 10.1006/mare.1997.0066
  24. Jacobs K., Marcon G., Witt D. (2004). Cost and performance information for doctors: an internal comparison. Management Accounting Research, 15: 337-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2004.03.005
  25. Jones C.S., Dewing I.P. (1997). The attitudes of NHS clinicians and medical managers towards changes in accounting controls. Financial Accountability & Management, 13 (3): 261-80. DOI: 10.1111/1468
  26. 0408.00037.
  27. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. (2004). Strategy maps. Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  28. Kasanen E., Lukka K., Siitonen A. (1993). The Constructive Approach in Management Accounting Research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 5: 243-64.
  29. Kasurinen T. (2002). Exploring management accounting change: the case of balanced scorecard implementation. Management Accounting Research, 13 (3): 323-43. DOI: 10.1006/mare.2002.0191
  30. Kennerley M., Neely A. (2002). A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22 (11): 1222-45. DOI: 10.1108/01443570210450293
  31. Kurunmaki L. (2004). A hybrid profession—the acquisition of management accounting expertise by medical professionals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29: 327–47. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00069-
  32. Labro E., Tuomela T. (2003). On bringing more action into management accounting research: process considerations based on two constructive case studies. European Accounting Review, 12 (3): 409-42. DOI: 10.1080/0963818032000083559
  33. Lapsley I. (1994). Responsibility accounting revived? Market reforms and budgetary control in health care. Management Accounting Research, 5: 337-52. DOI: 10.1006/mare.1994.1021
  34. Lapsley I. (1999). Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of substantive efficiency or a rationalising modernity?. Financial Account- ability & Management, 15 (3/4): 201-7. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0408.00081
  35. Lehtonen T. (2007). DRG-based prospective pricing and case-mix accounting – Exploring the mechanisms of successful implementation. Management Accounting Research, 18: 367-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2006.12.00
  36. Liguori M., Sicilia M., Steccolini I. (2012). Performance measurement e management nelle aziende pubbliche. In Rota S., Sicilia M., Steccolini I. (a cura di). Bilancio e misurazione delle performance nelle amministrazioni pubbliche. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli Editore.
  37. Longo F., Salvatore D., Tasselli S., Mele S., Monchiero G., Pinelli N. (a cura di) (2012). Il governo
  38. dei servizi territoriali: budget e valutazione dell’integrazione. Milano: Egea.
  39. Lowe A. (2000). Accounting in health care: some evidence on the impact of casemix systems. British Accounting Review, 32: 189-211. DOI: 10.1006/bare.2000.0131
  40. Mennicken A. (2008). Connecting worlds: the translation of international auditing standards into Post-Soviet audit practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33 (4/5): 384-414. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.06.00
  41. Miah N.Z., Mia L. (1996). Decentralization, Accounting Controls and Performance of Government Organizations: a New Zealand Empirical Study. Financial Accountability & Management, 12 (3): 173-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.1996.tb00421.x
  42. Ministero del Lavoro, della Salute e delle Politiche Sociali. DM 17 dicembre 2008. Istituzione del sistema informativo per il monitoraggio dell’assistenza domiciliare. Ministero del Lavoro, della Salute e delle Politiche Sociali. DM 17 dicembre 2008. Istituzione della banca dati finalizzata alla rilevazione delle prestazioni residenziali e semiresidenziali.
  43. Munir R., Baird K., Perera S. (2013). Performance measurement system change in an emerging economy bank. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26 (2): 196-233. DOI: 10.1108/0951357131130371
  44. Network Non Autosufficienza (2013). L’assistenza agli anziani non autosufficienti in Italia – Quarto Rapporto. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli Editore Nuti S., Seghieri C., Vainieri M., Zett S. (2012).
  45. Assessment and Improvement of the Italian Healthcare System: First Evidence from a Pilot National Performance Evaluation System. Journal of Healthcare Management, 57 (3): 182-98.
  46. Nuti S., Seghieri C., Vainieri M. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of a performance evaluation system in the public health care sector: some novel evidence from the Tuscany region experience. Journal of Management & Governance, 17: 59-69. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-012-9218-5
  47. Olson O., Humphrey C., Guthrie J. (2001). Caught in an evaluatory trap: a dilemma for public services under NPFM. The European Accounting Review, 10 (3): 505-22. DOI: 10.1080/09638180120088303
  48. Patton M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  49. Pettersen I.J. (2001). Hesitation and rapid action: the new public management reforms in the Norwegian hospital sector. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17: 19–39. DOI: 10.1016/S0956-5221(00)00031-2
  50. Silva P., Ferreira A. (2010). Performance management in primary healthcare services: evidence from a field study. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7 (4): 424-49. DOI: 10.1108/11766091011094527
  51. Stewart L., Bestor W. (2000). Applying a Balanced Scorecard to Health Care Organizations. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 11 (3): 75-82. DOI: 10.1002/1097--0053(200003/04);2-y
  52. Vagnoni E. (2004). La direzione delle aziende sanitarie. Criticità di contesto, economicità e tutela della salute. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  53. Yang M., Tung Y. (2006). Using path analysis to examine causal relationships among “balanced scorecard” performance indicators for general hospitals: The case of a public hospital system in Taiwan. Health Care Management Review, 31 (4): 280-8. DOI: 10.1097/00004010-200610000-00003
  54. Yin R.K. (1994). Case study research: design and method. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Zelman W.N., Pink G.H., Matthias C.B. (2003).
  55. Use of the balanced scorecard in health care. Journal of Health Care Finance, 29(4): 1-16.

  • Il ridisegno dei processi di cura secondo l'approccio value-based: quali insegnamenti da un multiple case study? Simone Laratro, Marco Giovanni Rizzo, Stefano Villa, in MECOSAN 126/2024 pp.7
    DOI: 10.3280/mesa2023-126oa17279

Antonella Cifalinò, Irene Eleonora Lisi, La misurazione delle performance dei servizi domiciliari e residenziali tra riforme istituzionali e applicazioni locali in "MECOSAN" 93/2015, pp 9-32, DOI: 10.3280/MESA2015-023002