Public funding and collaboration among different actors of innovation. A study based on the Sixth Community Innovation Survey

Author/s Valentina Gambardella
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2014/113
Language Italian Pages 28 P. 88-115 File size 130 KB
DOI 10.3280/STE2014-113004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Economic leterature has stressed the importance of collaboration among accademia, industry and government as a key driver of innovation. This paper analyses the effects of public funding in promoting cooperation in innovation activities in Italy and in Germany, using data from the sixth Community Innovation Survey. The results show that in both countries receiving public support is positively related to undertaking collaborative innovation, but in Germany this relationship is the strongest. In Italy it varies depending on the funding source, whereas regional incentives on promoting collaboration are weak. This result is largely related to the size of the firm benefiting from this type of pubblic support (small and medium-sized firms) and from the industrial sector theyb belong to (low-technological industries). Additionally, the data show that public financial support also influences the choice of partners, making it easier for firms to adopt a more complex rqange of linkages, including suppliers, clients, and reaserch institutions.

Keywords: Innovation policy, Cooperation, Public funding: Behavioural additionality, Community Innovation Survey

Jel codes: O31; O32

  1. Abramovsky L., Kremp E., López A., Schmidt T., Simpson H. (2005), Understanding co-operative R&D activity: evidence from four European countries, IFS Working Papers W05/23, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  2. Anand B., Khanna T. (2000), Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 3: 295- 315.
  3. Antonioli D., Marzucchi A. (2010), The Behavioural Additionality Dimension in Innovation Policies: a Review, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Istituzioni Territorio, WP 10/2010 Università di Ferrara. Disponibile on line all’indirizzo*:
  4. Asheim B., Boschma R., P. Cooke (2011), Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases, Regional Studies, 45, 7: 893-904.
  5. Balconi M., Passannanti A. (2006), I parchi scientifici e tecnologici nel Nord Italia, Milano: Franco Angeli.
  6. Belderbos R., Carree M., Lokshin B. (2004), Cooperative R&D and firm performance, Research policy, 33, 10: 1477-1492.
  7. Bianchi P., Pozzi C., Servidio G. (2010), Le politiche industriali alla prova del futuro. Analisi per una strategia nazionale, Rivista Economica del Mezzogiorno, 23, 3: 683-691.
  8. Bugamelli M., Cannari L., Lotti F. e Magri S. (2012), Il gap innovativo del sistema produttivo italiano: radici e possibili rimedi. Banca d’Italia, Questioni di Economia e Finanza, Occasional Paper n. 121.
  9. Buisseret T.J., Cameron H.M., Georghiou L. (1995), What Difference Does it Make? Additionality in the Public Support of R&D in large firms, International Journal of Technology Management, 10, 4: 587-600.
  10. Clarysse B., Georghiou L. (2006), Introduction and synthesis. In: OECD, Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, OECD Publishing: Paris.
  11. Clarysse B., Wright M., Mustar P. (2009), Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective, Research Policy, 38, 10: 1517-1533.
  12. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. (1990), Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1: 128-152.
  13. Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J. (2002), Links and Impacts: the Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D, Management Science, 48: 1-23.
  14. Di Fiore M., Potì B. (2009), Le Politiche di Incentivazione alla Ricerca Applicata Industriale: Esperienza Estera ed Esperienza Italiana. In: CERIS (2009), Modelli e metodologie per la valutazione dell’impatto del finanziamento pubblico alla ricerca industriale, pp. 21-108.
  15. Dodgson M. (1994), Technological collaboration and innovation. In: Dodgson M., Rothwell R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 285-292.
  16. Evangelista, R. (2007), Rilevanza e impatto delle politiche dell’innovazione in Italia. I risultati delle indagini CIS, Economia e Politica Industriale, 1: 103-124.
  17. Falk R., IDEA Consult (2009), Does Europe Change R&D Behavior? Assessing the behavioural additionality of the Sixth Framework Programme. Brussels
  18. Fier A., Aschhoff B., Löhlein H. (2006), Behavioural additionality of public R&D funding in Germany. In: OECD, Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, OECD Publishing: Paris, pp. 127-150.
  19. Freel M. (2006), Patterns of Technological Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services. Industry & Innovation, Vol. 13, 3: 335-358.
  20. Fritsch M., Lukas R. (2001), Who cooperates on R&D?. Research Policy, 30, 2: 297-312.
  21. Fritsch M., Schwirten C. (1999), Enterprise-university co-operation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems, Industry and innovation, 6, 1: 69-83.
  22. Gallia R. (2007), Il Fondo per la competitività e lo sviluppo. Rivista giuridica del Mezzogiorno, XXI, 2: 265-277.
  23. Gallo R., Mallone M., Zezza V. (2008), Trasferimento tecnologico: l’intervento RIDITT. L’industria, n.s., XXIX, 1: 207-226.
  24. Georghiou L. (2004), Evaluation of Behavioural Additionality. Concept Paper. In: Georghiou L., Clarysse B., Steurs G., Bilsen V., Larosse J. (Eds.), Making the Difference. The Evaluation of ‘Behavioural Additionality’ of R&D Subsidies, IWT-Observatory: Brussels, pp. 6-22.
  25. Leydesdorff L., Etzkowitz H. (1996), Emergence of a Triple Helix of university – industry – government relations, Science and Public Policy, 23, 5: 279-286.
  26. Leydesdorff L., Fritsch M. (2006), Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics, Research Policy, 35, 10: 1538-1553.
  27. Lundvall B.Å., Borrás S. (2005), Science, Technology and Innovation Policy. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D.C., Nelson R. (Eds.), Innovation Handbook, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 599-631.
  28. Miotti, L., Sachwald F. (2003), Co-operative R&D: Why and With Whom? An integrated Framework of Analysis, Research Policy, 32, 8: 1481-1499.
  29. MISE (2009), Migliorare le politiche di Ricerca e Innovazione per le Regioni. Contenuti e processi di policy.
  30. Nieto M.J., Santamaría L. (2007), The Importance of Diverse Collaborative Networks for the Novelty of Product Innovation, Technovation, 27, 6: 367-377.
  31. OECD (2004), Science and Innovation Policy. Key Challenges and Opportunities. OECD: Paris.
  32. Phan P., Siegel S., Wright M. (2005), Science Parks and Incubators: Observations, Synthesis and Future Research, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 2: 165-182.
  33. Piccaluga A., Balderi C., Daniele C. (2012), Gli uffici di trasferimento tecnologico delle città italiane: numeri ma non solo numeri, Economia e Politica Industriale, 4: 135-159.
  34. Ponds R., Van Oort F., Frenken K. (2010), Innovation, spillovers and university–industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach, Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 2: 231-255. Rondé P., Hussler C. (2005), Innovation in Regions. What Does Really Matter?. Research Policy, 34, 8: 1150-1172.
  35. Tether B. (2002), Who cooperates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis, Research Policy, 31, 6: 947-967.
  36. Traù F. (2009), Logica di un sistema di sostegno alle imprese. La politica industriale italiana dal secondo dopoguerra a ‘Industria 2015’, Economia e Politica Industriale, 4: 89-113.
  37. von Ledebur S. (2008), “Technology transfer offices and university patenting: a review”, Jena economic research papers, No. 2008/033.

Valentina Gambardella, Incentivi alla ricerca e collaborazione tra attori dell’innovazione. Uno studio basato sulla sesta indagine Community Innovation Survey (2006-2008) in "STUDI ECONOMICI " 113/2014, pp 88-115, DOI: 10.3280/STE2014-113004