Those Who Gaze and Are Affected. The Memory of Intelligibles and the Anagogic Process According to Plotinus, Treatise 33 [II 9] 16

Author/s Daniela P. Taormina
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/3 Language Italian
Pages 14 P. 495-508 File size 577 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2015-003001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In this study the question is addressed of the relation between sense perception and the memory of intelligibles in the experience of beauty as described by Plotinus in treatise 33 [Enn. II 9] 16. 39-56. Through an analysis of this passage, the Author compares the process of recollection to that of the ascension of the soul which, even in its embodied existence, can rise up to the intelligibles. This process may find a starting point in sense perception. However, sense perception can only exercise this function if it approaches sensible objects not in isolation, but in relation to the intelligible. When the soul grasps the presence of the intelligible in that which it perceives, it no longer sees the latter as merely a sensible object, but rather as an imitation of the intelligible. The soul thus establishes a link between the two levels: it is affected, experiences pleasure, and rises up to the intelligible. Reminiscence is therefore a complex process. It may be regarded as a circuit comprising three fundamental aspects: a) turning towards sensible objects; b) acknowledging sensible objects as imitations and, on account of the affection this engenders, transcending them; c) rising up to contemplation of the intelligible. These three aspects do not correspond to three successive moments, but rather to a single simultaneous movement. What the recollection of intelligibles implies, then, is not the complete rejection of the empirical perspective, but its transcendence through an affection that leads the soul to abandon its ordinary view of the world and recover the intelligibles buried within it.

Keywords: Plotinus, soul, recollection of intelligibles, sense perception, affection

  1. I trattati di Plotino sono citati secondo la seguente edizione: Plotinus. Opera (edition minor), ed. Paul Henry, Hans-Rudolf Schwyzer, t. I-III, Oxford Clarendon Press, Oxford 1964-1982. Dove non diversamente indicato le traduzioni sono mie.
  2. - Benveniste 1969: Émile Benveniste, Le Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes, Minuit, Paris, t. I-II, 1969.
  3. - Brisson 2006: Luc Brisson, La place de la mémoire dans la psychologie plotinienne, «Études platoniciennes», III (2006) (= L’âme amphibie. Études sur l’âme selon Plotin), pp. 13-27.
  4. - Chiaradonna 2009: Riccardo Chiaradonna, Plotin, la mémoire et la connaissance des intelligibles, «Philosophie antique», IX (2009), pp. 5-33.
  5. - Chiaradonna 2012: Id., Plotinus’ Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense-Perception and Discursive Thought, «Topoi», XXXI (2012), pp. 191-207.
  6. - Chiaradonna (in stampa): Id., Plotinus on Memory, Recollection and Discursive Thought, in Luca Castagnoli-Paola Ceccarelli (eds.), Greek Memories: Theories and Practices, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in stampa. - Darras-Worms 2007: Anne-Lise Darras-Worms, in Plotin. Traité 1 (I, 6), introduction, traduction, commentaire et notes, Les Éditions du Cerf, Paris 2007.
  7. - Gerson 1994: Lloyd P. Gerson, Plotinus, Routledge, London 1994.
  8. - Hadot 1990: Pierre Hadot, in Plotin. Traité 50 (III, 5), introduction, traduction, commentaire et notes, Les Éditions du Cerf, Paris 1990.
  9. - Hutchinson 2011a: Danny Muños-Hutchinson, Apprehension of Thought in Ennead 4.3.30, «The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition», V (2011), pp. 262-282.
  10. - Hutchinson 2011b: Id., The structure of appearances: Plotinus on the constitution of sensible objects, «The Philosophical Quarterly», n.s. LXI (2011), pp. 762-782.
  11. - King 2009: Richard A.H. King, Aristotle and Plotinus on Memory, De Gruyter, Berlin
  12. - New York 2009.
  13. - Kuisma 2003: Oiva Kuisma, Art or experience: a study on Plotinus’ aesthetics, Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, Helsinki 2003.
  14. - Longo 2012: Angela Longo, Memoria inattiva e memoria attiva in Plotino (“Enneadi” I 2, 4): un confronto con Aristotele (“De anima” II 5 e III 4), in Domenico Bosco et al. (a cura di), Testis fidelis. Studi di filosofia e scienze umane in onore di Umberto Galeazzi, Orthotes, Napoli 2012, pp. 425-441.
  15. - Maggi 2010: Claudia Maggi, Sinfonia matematica. Aporie e soluzioni in Platone, Aristotele, Plotino, Giamblico, Loffredo, Napoli 2010.
  16. - Morel 2009: Pierre-Marie Morel, Comment parler de la nature? Sur le traité 30 de Plotin, «Les Études philosophiques», XC (2009) (= Plotin et son platonisme), pp. 387-406.
  17. - Morel in stampa: Id., Plotinus, Epicurus and the Problem of Intellectual Evidence (Treatise 32 [V 5] 1), in Angela Longo - Daniela P. Taormina (eds.), Plotinus and Epicurus. Matter, perception, pleasure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in stampa.
  18. - Narbonne 2012: Jean-Marc Narbonne, in Plotin. OEuvres complètes t. I: Introduction. Traité 1 (I 6), Sur le beau, texte établi par Lorenzo Ferroni, introduit, traduit et annoté par Martin Achard et Jean-Marc Narbonne, Vrin, Paris 2012.
  19. - Nikulin 2014: Dmitri Nikulin, Memory and Recollection in Plotinus, «Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie», XCVI (2014), pp. 183-201.
  20. - Pépin 1992: Jean Pépin, L’épisode du portrait de Plotin (VP 1.4-9), in Luc Brisson et al. (sous la direction de), Porphyre. La Vie de Plotin. Étude d’introduction, texte grec et traduction française, commentaire, notes complémentaires, bibliographie, II, Vrin, Paris 1992, pp. 301-334.
  21. - Phillips 1987: John Phillips, Stoic “Common Notions” in Plotinus, «Dionysius», XI (1987), pp. 33-52.
  22. - Taormina 2010: Daniela P. Taormina, Plotino. El alma y sus dos olvidos, «Revista latinoamericana de filosofía», Anejo 2010, pp. 353-384.
  23. - Taormina 2011: Ead., Dalla potenzialità all’attualità. Un’introduzione al problema della memoria in Plotino, in Thomas Bénatouïl, Emanuele Maffi, Franco Trabattoni
  24. (eds.), Plato, Aristotle, or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity, Olms, Hildesheim 2011, pp. 139-159.
  25. - Taormina in stampa: Ead., «What is known through sense perception is an image». Plotinus tr. 32 (V 5) 1.12-19: an anti-Epicurean argument?, in Angela Longo – Daniela P. Taormina (eds.), Plotinus and Epicurus. Matter, perception, pleasure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in stampa.
  26. - Tornau 2010: Christian Tornau, Augustinus, Plotin und die neuplatonische De anima-Exegese. Philosophiehistorische Überlegungen zur Theorie des inneren Wortes in De trinitate, in Daniela P. Taormina (a cura di), L’essere del pensiero. Saggi sulla filosofia di Plotino, Bibliopolis, Napoli 2010, pp. 267-328.

Daniela P. Taormina, Coloro che guardano e provano un turbamento. Memoria degli intelligibili e percorso anagogico secondo plotino, trattato 33 [II 9] 16 in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 3/2015, pp 495-508, DOI: 10.3280/SF2015-003001