Produzione e consumo di cibo locale: perché è così difficile da fare? Un caso di studio da una iniziativa di Transition group nel Regno Unito

Author/s Jane Brandt, Rosanna Salvia, Giovanni Quaranta
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/2 Language English
Pages 11 P. 197-207 File size 148 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2016-002017
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The Transition Mayfield (UK) group ran a Local Food project to raise awareness in the local community about the importance of developing local food production and consumption networks; strengthening the local economy and fostering collaboration and skill sharing. The discussion reveals number of factors that were not addressed: growers can lack the additional energy and skills needed to market their produce locally; the community already has very active social networks and the Transition group could not add anything to it; there is a complex relationship between shopkeepers that determines which shop sells what produce. The paper shows that, when trying to promote local food production for local consumption, attention has to be paid and an understanding gained of the motivation and constraints that operate in every part of the network.

Keywords: Local food production, local food consumption, transition, community, UK, network.

  1. Bailey I., Hopkins R., Wilson G. (2010). Some things old, some things new: The spatial representations and politics of change of the peak oil relocalisation movement. Geoforum, 41: 595-605.
  2. Donmoyer R. (2000). Generalizability and the single case study. In: Gomm R., Hammersley M., Foster P. (eds.). Case study method. Sage, pp. 45-68.
  3. Hatch J.A., Wisniewski R. (eds.) (1995). Life history and narrative, Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
  4. Haxeltine A., Seyfang G. (2009). Transitions for the People: Theory and Practice of ‘Transition’ and ‘Resilience’ in the UK’s Transition Movement. Tyndall Centre for Climate-Change research, Working Paper 134, July.
  5. Hopkins R. (2008). The transition handbook: from oil dependency to local resilience. Green Books, Totnes, 240 pp.
  6. Maye D. (2016). Examining innovation for sustainability from the bottom up: An analysis of the permaculture community in England. Sociologia Ruralis.
  7. Mayfield & Five Ashes Parish Council (2008). Parish council strategy and plan 2006-2026, available at, (accessed 19 October 2016).
  8. Morris C., Buller H. (2003). The local food section: a preliminary assessment of its form and impact in Gloucestershire. British Food Journal, 106, 8: 559-566.
  9. Murray A., Kline C. (2015). Rural tourism and the craft beer experience: factors influencing brand loyalty in rural North Carolina, USA. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23, 8-9: 1198-1216. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2014.987146
  10. Natural England (2013). National character area profile 122: High Weald, --available at (accessed 19 October 2016).
  11. Pinkerton T., Hopkins R. (2009). Local Food: how to make it happen in your community. Transition Books, 216 pp.
  12. Polkinghorne Donald E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8, 1.
  13. Quilley S. (2011). Resilience Through Relocalization: Ecocultures of Transition? Transition to a post-carbon, post-consumer society: new, traditional and alternative ways of living in the ‘adjacent possible, Ecocultures Working Paper, 2012-1, University of Essex, UK, --available at, accessed October 15, 2016.
  14. Schnell S.M. (2013). Deliberate identities: Becoming local in America in a global age. Journal of Cultural Geography, 30, 1: 55-89.
  15. Shortridge J.R. (1996). Keeping tabs on Kansas: Reflections on regionally based field study. Journal of Cultural Geography, 16, 1: 5-16.
  16. Sidali K.L., Kastenholz E., Bianchi R. (2015), Food tourism, niche markets and products in rural tourism: combining the intimacy model and the experience economy as a rural development strategy. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23, 8-9: 1179-1197.
  17. Transition Mayfield (2007). Local Food producers, suppliers and restaurants, available at (accessed 19 October 2016).
  18. Transition Network (2013). Official initiatives by number, --available at (accessed 19 October 2016).
  19. Wilson G.A. (2014). Community resilience: path dependency, lock-in effects and transitional ruptures. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57, 1: 1-26. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2012.741519

Jane Brandt, Rosanna Salvia, Giovanni Quaranta, Local food production for local consumption: why is it so hard to achieve? A case study from a small UK Transition Initiative in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2/2016, pp 197-207, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2016-002017