The organisation of services of general interest in Finland

Author/s Johan Willner, Sonja Gronblom
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/3 Language English
Pages 28 P. 89-116 File size 278 KB
DOI 10.3280/EP2016-003004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Like in most European countries, SGIs in Finland have in recent years been subject to competition and increased private provision or privatisation. This development is motivated by expected cost reductions, by EU-regulations, by ideology and fashion, and in some cases by expected sales revenues. The empirical evaluations of SGI-reforms are few and somewhat contradictory, but the relative success of Finland’s manufacturing SOEs suggests that the public sector is hardly unable to organise efficient SGIs. A number of potential market failures suggest that public ownership should be taken seriously as an alternative to regulation. An increased emphasis on public ownership would be fairly easy to implement in Finland, because the state is still a significant owner, but EU’s policy on liberalisation and unbundling needs an overhaul.

Keywords: Public ownership, privatisation, cost efficiency, social objectives

Jel codes: H11, H42, H44, L33, L90

  1. Arocena P., Saal D. and Coelli T. (2009). Measuring the economies of horizontal and vertical integration in the US electric power industry: How costly is unbundling? Research Paper, Aston Business School, RP 0917.
  2. Arocena P., Saal D. and Coelli T. (2012). Vertical and horizontal scope economies in the regulated U.S. electric power industry. Journal of Industrial Economics, LX(3): 434-467.
  3. Auriol E. (1998). Deregulation and quality. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16(2): 169-194.
  4. Belleflamme P. and Peitz M. (2010). Industrial Organization. Markets and Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Björkroth T. and Willner J. (2003). Liberalization and technical change in Finland. In: Hulsink W. and Wubben E.F.M. (eds.). On Creating Competition and Strategic Restructuring. Regulatory Reform in Public Utilities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 157-184 (Ch. 6).
  6. Bös D. (1993). Privatisation. A Theoretical Treatment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  7. Boycko M., Schleifer A. and Vishny R.W. (1996). A theory of privatisation. Economic Journal, 106: 309-319.
  8. Boyd C.W. (1986). The comparative efficiency of state owned enterprises. In: Negandhi, Anant R. (ed.), Multinational Corporations and State-Owned Enterprises: A New Challenge in International Business. Greenwich, Conn. and London: Research in International Business and International Relations, JAI Press.
  9. Boylaud O. and Nicoletti G. (2000), Regulation, market structure and performance in telecommunications’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 237.
  10. Bradburd R. (1995). Privatization of natural monopoly public enterprises: The regulation issue. Review of Industrial Organization, 19(3): 247-267.
  11. Buehler S. (2005). The promise and pitfalls of restructuring network industries. German Economic Review, 6(2): 205-228.
  12. Clifton J., Díaz-Fuentes D., Fernández-Gutiérrez M. and Revuelta J. (2011). Is market-oriented reform producing a ‘two-track Europe? Evidence from electricity and telecommunications. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 82(4): 495-513.
  13. Daßler T., Parker D. and Saal D. (2002). Economic performance in European telecommunications, 1978-98: A comparative study. European Business Review, 14(36): 194-209.
  14. de Castro F., Salto M. and Steiner H. (2013). The gap between public and private wages: new evidence for the EU. European Economy, Economic Papers 508, October.
  15. De Fraja G. (1993). Productive efficiency in public and private firms. Journal of Public Economics, 50(1): 15-30.
  16. Dixit A. (1997). Power of incentives in private versus public organizations. American Economic Review: 87: 378-382.
  17. Ferguson P. (1988). Industrial Economics: Issues and Perspectives. Houndmills: Macmillan.
  18. Florio M. (2004). The Great Divestiture. Evaluating the Welfare Impact of the British Privatizations 1979-1997. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  19. Florio M. (2013). Network Industries and Social Welfare. The Experiment that Reshuffled European Utilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Fraquelli G. and Erbetta F. (2000). Privatisation in Italy: An analysis of factor productivity and technical efficiency. In: Parker D. (ed.). Privatisation and Corporate Performance, International Library of Critical Writings in Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 537-557.
  21. Frey B.S. and Benz M. (2005). Can private learn from public governance. The Economic Journal, 115(507): F377-F396.
  22. Grönblom S. and Willner J. (2008). Privatization and liberalization: Costs and benefits in the presence of wage bargaining. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 78(1): 133-160.
  23. Grönblom S. and Willner J. (2014). Organisational form and individual motivation: Public ownership, privatisation and fat cats. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(3): 267-284.
  24. Gugler K., Liebensteiner M. and Schmitt S. (2014). Vertical disintegration in the European electricity sector: Empirical evidence on lost synergies. Wirtschaftsuniversität, Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 190, Vienna.
  25. Haatainen J. (2000). Bussiliikenteen kilpailuttamisen vaikutukset palveluihin ja niiden laatuun. In Aarrevaara T., Haatainen J., Harisalo R. and Stenwall J. (eds.). Kilpailuttaminen joukkoliikenteessä – Kilpailuttamisen vaikutusten kartoittaminen. Tampere: Tampereen Yliopisto, Hallintotieteen laitos, pp. 65-95.
  26. Hjerppe R. and Kalevi L. (1997). Finnish experiences in measuring and promoting productivity in the public sector. Government Institute for Economic Research, Discussion papers, 150, Helsinki.
  27. Hodge G.A. (2000). Privatization. An International Review of Performance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  28. Hukka J.J. and Katko T.S. (2002). Water privatisation - panacea or pancake?, mimeo, Tampere University of Technology.
  29. Iordanoglou C.H. (2001). Public Enterprsies Revisited. A Closer Look at the 1974-79 UK Labour Productivity Record. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  30. Kähkönen L. (2001). Kilpailuttamisen kustannusvaikutukset Helsingin kaupungin bussiliikenteessä, kotipalvelun ateriapalveluksessa, katujen kunnossapidossa ja koulusiivouksessa. Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskus, Tutkimuksia, 5.
  31. Kasvio A. (1997). Finland’s road to the Information Society, paper prepared for the Finnish Sociological Congress.
  32. Kaufmann D., Kraay A. and Mastruzzi M. (2003). Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996-2002, mimeo, The World Bank.
  33. Kohtamäki V. (2000). Bussiliikenteen kilpailuttamisen talodellisista vaikutuksista. In: Aarrevaara T., Haatainen J., Harisalo R. and Stenwall J. (eds.). Kilpailuttaminen joukkoliikenteessä – Kilpailuttamisen vaikutusten kartoittaminen. Tampere: Tampereen Yliopisto, Hallintotieteen laitos, pp. 26-44.
  34. Kopsakangas-Savolainen M. (2003). Quantity versus price competition in the Finnish electricity markets. Finnish Economic Papers, 16(2): 51-60.
  35. Kwoka J. (2008): Restructuring the U.S. electric power sector: A review of recent studies. Review of Industrial Organization, 32: 165-196.
  36. Laffont J.-J. and Tirole J. (1991). Privatisation and incentives. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7: 84-105.
  37. Lehto E. (1991). Valtionrautateiden tuottavuus 1945-1989, Helsinki: Työväen Taloudellinen Tutkimuslaitos, Tutkimuksia 36.
  38. Lehto E. (1997a). Kilpailuako rautateille?. In: Lehto E. (ed.). Monopoli vai kilpailu? Yksityistäminen, sääntely ja kilpailurajat. Helsinki/Juva: Atena, pp. 274-290.
  39. Lehto E. (1997b). Postipalvelut ja markkinamekanismi. In: Lehto E. (ed.). Monopoli vai kilpailu? Yksityistäminen, sääntely ja kilpailurajat. Helsinki/Juva: Atena, pp. 218-235.
  40. Lehto E. (2010). Electricity prices in the Finnish retail market. Working Papers, 259, Labour Institute for Economic Research, Helsinki.
  41. Lijesen M., Mannaerts H. and Mulder M. (2001). Will California come to Europe, mimeo, CPB, Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Research.
  42. MacAvoy P.W. (1998). Testing for competitiveness of markets for long distance telephone services: Competition finally? Review of Industrial Organization, 13(3): 295-319.
  43. Maddison A. (2001). The World Economy. A Millennial Perspective. Paris: OECD.
  44. Mäkeläinen U. and Pirttinen S. (2000). Bussiliikenteen kilpailuttamisen henkilöstövaikutukset. In: Aarrevaara T., Haatainen J., Harisalo R. and Stenwall J. (eds.). Kilpailuttaminen joukkoliikenteessä – Kilpailuttamisen vaikutusten kartoittaminen. Tampere: Tampereen Yliopisto, Hallintotieteen laitos, pp. 45-64.
  45. Martin S. (1993). Endogeneous firm efficiency in a Cournot principal-agent model. Journal of Economic Theory, 59(2): 445-450.
  46. Martin S. and Parker D. (1997). The Impact of Privatisation. Ownership and Corporate Performance in the UK. London and New York: Routledge.
  47. Martin R., Roma M. and Vansteenkiste I. (2005). Regulatory reforms in selected EU network industries. European Central Bank, Occasional Paper Series. no. 28.
  48. Martinek J.P. and Orlando M.J. (2001). Neither lucky nor good: The case of electricity deregulation in California, mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
  49. Megginson W.L. and Netter J. M. (2001). From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatisation. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXIX, (2): 321-389.
  50. Miettinen T. (2000). Poikkeavatko valtionyhtiöt yksityisistä? The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Discussion Papers No. 730.
  51. Millward R. (1982). The comparative performance of public and private ownership. In: Roll Lord E. (ed.). The Mixed Economy. London: Macmillan.
  52. Moen E. (2002). Globalisering og industripolitiske straegier. En sammenligning av Finland og Norge. Oslo: Makt- og demokratiutredningens rapportserie, Nr. 41.
  53. Mueller D.C. (2001). Rethinking EU merger policy', paper presented at the V:th Annual EUNIP conference.
  54. Newbery D.M. (2000). Privatization, Restructuring and Regulation of Network Utilities, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
  55. Newbery D.M. (2006). Privatizing network industries. In: Köthenbürger M., Sinn H.-W. and Whalley J. (eds.). Privatisation Experiences in the European Union. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3-49.
  56. Oldale A. (1997). Local bus deregulation and timetable instability. Working Paper, The Economics of Industry Group, London School of Economics.
  57. Parker D. (ed.) (1998). Privatisation in the European Union. Theory and Policy Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
  58. Ranki R. (2012). Niin siinä käy kun omistaa. Tarinaa valtionyhtiöistä. Ministry of Employment and the Economy/Edita Publishing: Porvoo.
  59. Rodrik D. (2000). How far will international economic integration go? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(2): 177-186.
  60. Rothkopf M.H. (2007). Dealing with failed deregulation: What would Price C. Watts do? Electricity Journal, 20(7): 10-16.
  61. Saal D.S. and Parker D. (2000). The impact of privatisation and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: A translog cost function model. Managerian and Decision Economics, 21(6): 253-268.
  62. Salminen A. and Viinamäki O.-P. (2001). Market orientation in the Finnish public sector. From public agency to privatised company. Ministry of Finance and University of Vaasa, Research Reports 2/2001, Helsinki.
  63. Schneider F. (2003). Privatisation in OECD countries: Theoretical reasons and results obtained. Journal of Institutional Comparisons, 1(3): 24-29.
  64. Shapiro C. and Willig R.D. (1990). Economic rationales for the scope of privatisation. In: Parker D. (ed.). Privatisation and Corporate Performance. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2000, pp. 39-71.
  65. Spence A.M. (1975). Monopoly, quality, and regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, 6(2): 417-429.
  66. Sulamaa P. (2001). Essays in Deregulated Finnish and Nordic Electricity Markets. Helsinki: Taloustieto OY, published for ETLA - The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
  67. Sung N. (1998). The embodiment hypothesis revisited: Evidence from the U.S. local exchange carriers. Information Economics and Policy, 10(2): 219-236.
  68. Taylor W.E. and Taylor L.D. (1993). Postdivestiture long-distance competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 83: 185-190.
  69. Thomas S. (2006). The grin of the Cheshire cat. Energy Policy, 34: 1974-1983.
  70. Tichy G. (2001). What do we know of the success and failure of mergers. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 1(4): 347-374.
  71. Tyson W.J. (1990). Effects of deregulation on service co-ordination in the metropolitan areas. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 24(3): 283-295.
  72. van Dam J. and Went R. (2001). Liberalizing network utilities: What’s in it for the citizen?, mimeo, The Netherlands Court of Audit.
  73. White P.J. (1990). Bus deregulation: A welfare balance sheet. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 24(3): 311-332.
  74. Willner J. (1996/2000). Privatisation of natural monopolies: A comment. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(6): 869-882, or as In Parker D. (ed.). Privatisation and Corporate Performance, The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar, 2000, pp. 14-27.
  75. Willner J. (2001). Ownership, efficiency, and political interference. European Journal of Political Economy, 17(4): 723-748.
  76. Willner J. (2003). Offentligt företagande och ekonomisk utveckling – kan Finlands erfarenheter generaliseras? In: Eriksson R., Jäntti M. and Willner J. (eds.). Att förstå och att förändra världen. En festskrift för Jan Otto Andersson. Turku: Åbo Akademi Press, pp. 233-255.
  77. Willner J. (2006). Privatisation and public ownership in Finland. In: Köthenbürger M., Sinn H.-W. and Whalley J. (eds.). Privatisation Experiences in the European Union. MIT Press, pp. 141-162.
  78. Willner J. (2008). Liberalisation, competition and ownership in the presence of vertical relations. Empirica, 35: 499-464.
  79. Willner J. and Flink J. (2015). International competition and the scope for wider objectives than profit maximisation, mimeo.
  80. Willner J. and Grönblom J. (2013). Reforming a network industry: Consequences for cost efficiency and welfare. International Review of Applied Economics, 27(2): 265-284.
  81. Willner J. and Grönblom S. (2016). Quality provision under conditions of oligopoly, mimeo.
  82. Willner J. and Parker D. (2007). The Performance of public and private enterprise under conditions of active and passive ownership and competition and monopoly. Journal of Economics, 90(3): 221-253.
  83. The Belgian Central Economic Council and the Belgian Federal Planning Bureau (2006), Reforming Network Industries, Highlights of conference The Lisbon Strategy: A motor for market reforms of the network industries, jointly organised by the European Economic and Social Committee, –
  84. Elisa (2015), Homepage, –, accessed 8.6.2015.
  85. Energy Authority (2015a), Homepage, –, accessed 3.11.2016.
  86. Energy Authority (2015b), National Report 2015 to the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators and to the European Commission, Ref. 1842/601/2015, 10.7.2015, –, accessed 2.6.2015.
  87. European Commission (2004), Mergers: Commission decides to allow Fortum to increase its shareholding in Gasum in the Finnish energy sector, Press release, IP/03/1425, Brussels, 1st December 2004.
  88. European Commission (2011), A Quality Framework for Services of General Interest in Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions, Brussels, 20.12.2011, COM(2011) 900 final, –, accessed 27.5.2015.
  89. European Trade Union Confederation (2007), Public Services – Services of General (Economic) Interest – SG(E)Is,, accessed 27.5.2015.
  90. The Guardian (2000), ‘Ringing up the right numbers’, 14 October, Jobs and Money Section, p. 2.
  91. Helsingin Sanomat (2003), ’Palkka putosi ja työt lisääntyivät’, 30 November, Talous ja työ, p. E2.
  92. Helsingin Sanomat, ’Maakaasuyhtiö Gasum siirtyy yllätyskaupassa valtion määräysvaltaan’ 3 November 2014, –, accessed 9.6.2016.
  93. Hufvudstadsbladet (2002), ’Statligt ägande under lupp’, 23.5.2003, p. 11.
  94. International Energy Authority (2013), Energy Policies of IEA Countries: Finland 2013 Review, Paris –, accessed 14.6.2016.
  95. Kauppalehti (2015), Gasum myi Suomen jakeluverkot Skottlantiin, 22.6.2015, – maPNmq.
  96. Liiketaloustieteen tutkimuslaitos (1989), Valtionyhtiöt markkinataloudessa, Helsinki.
  97. Ministry of Employment and the Economy (2013), Sähkömarkkinat Suomessa ja EU:ssa, Helsinki: Parlamentaarinen energia- ja ilmastointikomitea, 17.12.2013, –, accessed 14.6.2016.
  98. Ministry of Finance (2002), Kohti tehokkaampaa ja laadukkaampaa julkista taloutta,Valtiovarainministeriön työryhmä, VM128:00/2001, Keskustelualoitteita nro 70, Helsinki.
  99. Ministry of Trade and Industry (1991), Statsbolagen 1990; [Annual reports for the state-owned companies], Helsinki.
  100. Ministry of Trade and Industry (1996), Statsbolagen 1995; [Annual reports for the state-owned companies], Helsinki.
  101. Ministry of Trade and Industry (2001), Statsbolagen och intressebolagen 2000; [Annual reports for the state-owned and associated companies], Helsinki.
  102. Nord Pool (2015), Homepage, –, accessed 14.6.2016.
  103. OECD (2013), Regulation in Energy, Transport and Communications, –, accessed 8.2.2016.
  104. Opstock (1996), Julkiset noteeratut yhtiöt 1996, Lahti: Oko-Osuuspankit.
  105. Paul Budde Communications (2015), Finland – Telecoms Infrastructure, Operators, Regulations – Statistics and Analyses), Paul Budde Communications Pty Ltd, 16.10.2015. – ture-Operators-Regulations-Statistics-and-Analyses.html, accessed 14.6.2016.
  106. The Prime Minister’s Office (2011), Statsrådets principbeslut om statens ägarpolitik (2011), 3.11.
  107. The Prime Minister’s Office (2015), Annual Report of the State’s Ownership Steering, 2014, Helsinki.
  108. The Prime Minister’s Office (2015), Annual Report of the State’s Ownership Steering, 2014, Helsinki.
  109. The Prime Minister’s Office (2016a), Expansion of the Ownership Base, 18.10.2016, –, Accessed 2.11.2016.
  110. The Prime Minister’s Office (2016b), Annual Report of the State’s Ownership Steering, 2015, Helsinki.
  111. Solidium (2015), Annual Report 2014, Solidium: Helsinki
  112. Talouselämä (2011), Gasumin kaasun hinnassa oli liikaa ilmaa, 21.12.2011, – 71174, accessed 9.6.2016.
  113. Talouselämä (2016), Kaasu hävisi jo Suomessa, 22.1.2016, –, accessed 9.6.2016.
  114. Utility Week (2011), ’Vertical separation of water firms ’inefficient and expensive’’, 5.7.2011, –, accessed 3.11.2016.
  115. Viestintävirasto (2016), Postipalvelujen tarjonta ja postimarkkinoiden kehittyminen, Press Release, 12.02.2016, – postitoiminta.html, accessed 7.6.2016.
  116. VR Group (2015), VR Group toimii kilpaillussa ympäristössä, Homepage, –, accessed 7.6.2015.
  117. World Bank (1995), Bureaucrats in Business. The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  118. Yle (2016): ’Rehn lupasi puuttua sähkön siirtohintojen korotuksiin lailla’, 4.2.2016, –, accessed 5.2.2016.

  • Rationales, performance and governance of public entreprises. Editorial introduction Luc Bernier, Massimo Florio, Johan Willner, in ECONOMIA PUBBLICA 3/2017 pp.5
    DOI: 10.3280/EP2016-003001

Johan Willner, Sonja Gronblom, The organisation of services of general interest in Finland in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " 3/2016, pp 89-116, DOI: 10.3280/EP2016-003004