Antoine de Montchrétien and development economics

Author/s Claudia Sunna
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/1 Language English
Pages 13 P. 101-113 File size 197 KB
DOI 10.3280/SPE2017-001005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This work analyzes the economic thought of Antoine de Montchrétien in the light of the categories of development economics, which emerged in the aftermath of World War II. In the history of economic thought the reconstructions of economic development analysis have often recognized that mercantilists and development economists have much in common. We will apply this comparison to Montchrétien’s Traicté de l’Oeconomie Politique by analyzing the common ground of development economics and mercantilism in relation to national industrialization and economic growth. There will be also a focus on the "microfoundations" of the Traicté regarding individual behavior and unemployment as crucial factors for the explanation of economic development. We conclude that it is highly significant to find very similar rationales in explaining development processes in such an extensive time frame.

Keywords: Antoine de Montchrétien; development economics; mercantilism; industrialization; nationalism.

Jel codes: B11, B31, O21

  1. Arndt H.W. (1987). Economic Development. The History of an Idea, London, The University of Chicago Press.
  2. Billacois F. (1999). Introduction. In A. de Montchrestien, Traicté de l’Oeconomie Politique, Genève, Droz: 7-36.
  3. Brazzini G. (1988). Dall’economia aristotelica all’economia politica. Saggio sul “Traicté” di Montchrétien, Pisa: ETS.
  4. Browning O. (1890). Montchrestien, the First French Economist, Edinburgh Review, CLXXII, July-October: 140-160.
  5. Clark H.C. (1998). Commerce, the Virtues, and the Public Sphere in Early-Seventeenth-Century France, French Historical Studies, 21(3): 415-440.
  6. Condorcet J.A. (1793-94). Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progrès de l’esprit humain, Paris, Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, 1970.
  7. Dutt A.K. (2016). Development Economics. In Faccarello G. and H. Kurz (eds.) Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis, Vol. III, Cheltenham-UK, Northhampton-MA USA, Edward Elgar: 91-105.
  8. Funck-Brentano T. (1889). Introduction. In Montchrétien A. de, Traicté de l’Oeconomie Politique, Genève, Slatkine Reprint, 1970: I-CXVII.
  9. Garnier J. (1852). De l’origin et de la filiation du mot économie politique, Paris, Guillaumin.
  10. Gerschenkron A. (1962). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.
  11. Grampp W.D. (1993). An Appreciation of Mercantilism. In Magnusson L. (ed.), Mercantilist Economics, Norwell, Kluwer Academic Publisher: 59-86.
  12. Gualerzi D. and Sunna C. (2016). ‘The rise and decline of development economics in the history of economic thought’ in Sunna C. and D. Gualerzi (eds.) Development Economics in the Twenty-First Century, Abingdon, Routledge: 1-13.
  13. Gualerzi D. (2016). Albert Hirschman: unbalanced growth theory. In Sunna C. and D. Gualerzi (eds.) Development Economics in the Twenty-First Century, Abingdon: Routledge: 34-48.
  14. Harsin P. (1933). Antoine de Montchrétien. In Seligman E.R.A. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. X, London, MacMillan & Co: 636.
  15. Heckscher E.F. (1931). Mercantilism, London, Allen & Unwin.
  16. Hirschman A.O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven, Yale University Press.
  17. Hirschman A.O. (1977). The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  18. Keynes J.M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London, MacMillan.
  19. Lewis W.A. (1955). The Theory of Economic Growth, Homewood-ILL, Richard D. Irwing.
  20. Magnusson L.G. (2003). Mercantilism. In Samuels W.J., J.E. Biddle, J.B. Davis (eds.) Companion to the History of Economic Thought, Malden-MA, Blackwell Publishing Ltd: 46-60.
  21. Meier G.M. (2005). Biography of a Subject. An Evolution of Development Economics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  22. Montchrétien A. de (1615). Traicté de l’Oeconomie Politique, (ed. F. Billacois), Genève, Droz, 1999.
  23. Myrdal G. (1957). Economic Theory and Under-developed Regions, London, Duckworth.
  24. Nurkse R. (1953). Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  25. Oman C.P and Wignaraja G. (1991). The Post-war Evolution of Development Thinking, Paris, OECD.
  26. Palm F.C. (1924). Mercantilism as a Factor in Richelieu’s Policy of National Interests, Political Science Quarterly, 39(4): 650-664.
  27. Panichi N. (1989). Antoine de Montchrétien. Il circolo dello Stato, Milano, Guerini e Associati.
  28. Perrotta C. (1988). Produzione e lavoro produttivo nel Mercantilismo e nell’Illuminismo, Galatina, Congedo.
  29. Perrotta C. (2004). Consumption as an Investment. The Fear of Goods from Hesiod to Adam Smith, London and New York, Routledge.
  30. Rosenstein-Rodan P.N. (1943). Problems of Industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, The Economic Journal, 53(210-211), Jun–Sept: 202–11.
  31. Rostow W.W. (1960). The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  32. Rudloff M.P (1962). A. de Montchrétien et les problèmes du développement économique, Revue d’histoire économique et sociale, 40(2): 145-174.
  33. Serra A. (1613). Breve Trattato delle cause che possono far abbondare li regni d’oro e d’argento dove non son miniere, in Custodi (1803-16), Milano, Destefanis, 1803, English trans., A Short Treatise on the Wealth and Poverty of Nations, London-New York, Anthem Press, 2011.
  34. Schumpeter J.A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis, Abingdon, Routledge, 2006.
  35. Spengler J.J. (1942). French predecessors of Malthus. A Study in Eighteenth-Century age and Population Theory, 3rd ed., New York, Octagon Books, 1980.
  36. Spengler J.J. (1960). Mercantilist and Physiocratic Growth Theory. In Hoselitz B. (ed.) Theories of Economic Growth, Toronto, The Free Press: 3-64.
  37. Sunna C. (2007). Did Keynes Go to Developing Countries?, Istituzioni e Sviluppo Economico-Institutions and Economic Development, 1-2-3: 1-23.
  38. Waterman A.M.C. (2002). “New Political Economies” Then and Now: Economic Theory and the Mutation of Political Doctrine, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(1): 13-51.
  39. Wellman K. (2003). Making science social: the conferences of Théophraste Renaudot, 1633–1642, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
  40. Wiles R.C. (1974). Mercantilism and the Idea of Progress, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 8(1): 56-74.

Claudia Sunna, Antoine de Montchrétien and development economics in "HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY" 1/2017, pp 101-113, DOI: 10.3280/SPE2017-001005