Does piped water improve the welfare of poor households?

Author/s Dian Rarassanti, Alin Halimatussadiah, Fithra Faisal Hastiadi, Pyan Putro S. A. Muchtar
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/3 Language English
Pages 16 P. 119-134 File size 225 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2016-003010
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The use of improved water sources could affect households’ welfare in the form of better health quality. The number of households that have access to piped water, an acknowledged type of improved drinking water sources, is very low in Indonesia due to low investment in water infrastructure. For poor households, access to piped water is essential as the ability to pay for other kinds of clean water is weak. This study aims to examine the impact of the use of piped water on households’ welfare by looking at the difference between the welfare score of households that are connected to piped water and that of those who are not. The two groups are selected using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method. The study employs Central Bureau of Statistics household survey data in South Tangerang City, Banten Province. The result shows that the welfare of piped water consumers is significantly higher than the non-consumers. To expand the program, we recommend that the government should put more effort to make drinking water with pipeline distribution system more accessible to poor households by subsidizing them.

Keywords: Household welfare, piped water, Propensity Score Matching (PSM).

Jel codes: C21, L95, Q25

  1. Anderson E., Anglia E. and Anderson E. (2008). Economic Impacts of Access to Water and Sanitation in Ethiopia: Evidence from the Welfare Monitoring Surveys, No. 3. Addis Ababa.
  2. Bateman O. Massee, Smith S. and Roark P. (1993). A Comparison of The Health Effect of Water Suppply and Sanitation in Urban and Rural Areas of Five Afircan Countries. Washington D.C.
  3. Becker S.O. and Ichino A. (2002). Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4): 358-377.
  4. Blagbrough V. (2001). Looking Back: The Long-Term Impacts of Water and Sanitation Projects.
  5. Buck S., Au M. and David H. (2015). Measuring the Welfare Losses from Urban Water Supply Disruptions. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 3(3): 743-778. DOI: 10.1086/687761
  6. Checkley W., Gilman R.H., Black R.E., Epstein L.D., Cabrera L. and Sterling C.R. (2004). Effect of Water and Sanitation on Childhood Health in a Poor Peruvian Peri-urban Community. The Lancet, 363: 112-118.
  7. Damin S. (1995). Transformasi Sumber Daya Manusia: Analisis Fungsi Pendidikan, Dinamika Prilaku Dan Kesejahteraan Manusia Indonesia Masa Depan. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
  8. Devoto B.F., Duflo E., Dupas P., Parienté W. and Pons V. (2012). Happiness on Tap: Piped Water Adoption in Urban Morocco. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(4): 68-99.
  9. Esrey S.A., Potash J.B., Roberts L. and Shiff C. (1991). Effects of improved water supply and sanitation on ascariasis, diarrhoea, dracunculiasis, hookworm infection, schistosomiasis, and trachoma. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 69(5): 609-621.
  10. GLAAS (2014). Investing in Water and Sanitation: Increasing Access, Reducing Inequalities. Geneva.
  11. Hoddinott J. (1997). Water, Health, and Income: A Review, No. 25. Washington, D.C.
  12. HSBC (2012). Exploring the Links between Water and Economic Growth A Report Prepared for HSBC by Frontier Economics: Executive Summary. London.
  13. Hutton G., Haller L. and Bartram J. (2007). Global cost-benefit analysis of water supply and sanitation interventions. Journal of Water and Health, 5(4): 481-502.
  14. Jalan J. and Ravallion M. (2003). Does Piped Water Reduce Diarrhea for Children. Journal of Econometrics, 112(1): 157-173.
  15. Khander S.R., Koolwal G.B. and Samad H.A. (2010). Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-8028-4
  16. Maryono (2007). Menilai Aksesibilitas Air Minum (Studi Kasus: Aksesibilitas Air Bersih bagi Masyarakat Miskin di Semarang). Jurnal Presipitasi, 3(2): 86-92.
  17. Paranna A. (2003). Kualitas Air Dan Pilihan Penggunaan Air Tanah. Universitas Indonesia.
  18. Patunru A.A. (2015). Special Research Article on Health Policy Access to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation in Indonesia. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 2(2): 234-244.
  19. Roushdy R., Sieverding M. and Radwan H. (2012). The Impact of Water SUpply and Sanitation on Child Health: Evidence of Egypt, 25. New York.
  20. Samsuhadi (2009). Pemanfaatan Air Tanah Jakarta. Jurnal Air Indonesia, 5(1): 9-22.
  21. SIWI and WHO (2005). Making Water a Part of Economic Development: The Economic Benefits of Improved Water. Stockholm.
  22. Tsukada L.R. and Hailu D. (2016). The Impact of Piped Water Supply on Household Welfare, No. 46. Boschstraat.
  23. WHO and UNICEF (2008). Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation. Geneva: WHO Press.
  24. WHO and UNICEF (2015). Progress on Drinking Water 2015 update and MDG Assessment. Geneva: WHO Press.

Dian Rarassanti, Alin Halimatussadiah, Fithra Faisal Hastiadi, Pyan Putro S. A. Muchtar, Does piped water improve the welfare of poor households? in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 3/2016, pp 119-134, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2016-003010