Economic expertise and policy beliefs - The think tanks of the Italian economy from the social conflict of the 1970s to the Maastricht Treaty

Author/s Piero Bini
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/2 Language English
Pages 19 P. 5-23 File size 276 KB
DOI 10.3280/SPE2017-002001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper explores the activities of five think tanks at work on the Italian economy during the 1970s and 1980s. They are: Cespe (Economic Policy Research Centre) and Csc (the research departement of the Confederation of Italian Industries) in the second half of the 1970s; Ceep (Economic Policy Study Center) from 1973 to 1992; Cer (Research Europe Center) from 1981 to 1992; Isel (Labour Economic Studies Institute) from 1981 to 1985. Based on the experience of these study centres, the paper considers some leading topics in the think tank’s literature, such as 1) the relationship between knowledge and power; 2) the challenging and problematic path between the economic expertise and the aspiration to influence the policy-making. In particular, the study-cases analysed show a variety of nexus between knowledge and policy, in some cases of a conflictual nature, in others of a dialectical nature, and in yet others legitimising one another. As a consequence of this focus on these 5 think tanks, some major issues of the Italian economy of that time are also brought to the attention of the reader: the ways then adopted to escape from inflation; the inability of the ruling powers to address the crisis of public finance and the soaring public debt; and the great uncertainty about the effectiveness of the quantitative parameters of the Maastricht Treaty in providing an appropriate solution for Italy. In general, the paper provides some reflections on the different guises in which economics seeks a place in public discourse.

Keywords: Italian economic thought in the 1970s and 1980s, Think tanks, From economists to policymakers, Industrial relations, National Budget, Deficit, and Debt.

Jel codes: B2, D7, E65, H6, Z18

  1. Arcelli M. (1991). Speech. In: “La Legge Finanziaria per il 1992”. Ceep Economia, n. 5: 21-24.
  2. Backhouse R. (1994). Economists and the economy: the evolution of economic ideas, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
  3. Boyer (2012). The four fallacies of contemporary austerity policies: The lost keynesian legacy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, n. 36: 283-312.
  4. Coats A.W. and D. Colander (eds.) (1989). The Spread of Economic Ideas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  5. Diletti M. (2009). I think tank, Bologna, il Mulino.
  6. Dyson K. and K. Featherstone (1999). The Road to Maastricht. Negotiating Economic and Monetary Union, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  7. Masala A. (2012). Crisi e rinascita del liberalismo classico, Pisa, Edizioni ETS.
  8. McGann J. G. (2012). The global go to think tanks report 2011. In: Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Final Edition, January 20.
  9. Medema S. G. (2005). Ideology and Economic Analysis: Lessons from the History of Modern Economic Thought. Revue de Philosophie Économique, 11 (June):113-136.
  10. Radaelli C. M. (1995). The Role of Knowledge in the Policy Process. Journal of European Public Policy, n. 2, June: 159-183.
  11. Radaelli C. M. and A. P. Martini (1998). Think tanks, advocacy coalitions and policy change: the Italian case. In: Stone, Denham and Garnett (eds.) (1998): 59-81.
  12. Regonini G. et M. Giuliani (1994). Italie: Au-delà d’une démocratie consensuelle? In: Le Tournant néo-libéral en Europe. Idées et recettes dans les pratiques gouvernementales, Paris, Éditions L’Harmattan: 123-200.
  13. Sabatier P. A. (ed.) (1999). Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder and Oxford, Westview Press.
  14. Sabatier P. A. and H. C. Jenkins-Smith (1993). Policy Change and Learning. An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder-San Francisco-Oxford, Westview Press.
  15. Savona P. (2008). Guido Carli in Confindustria: maestro di pensiero e statista. In: Savona (ed.) (2008): XIII-XCVIII.
  16. Savona P. (ed.) (2008). Guido Carli presidente di Confindustria, 1976-1980. Scritti e discorsi di Guido Carli, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri.
  17. Stone D. (1996). Capturing the Political Imagination. Think Tanks and the Policy Process, London – Portland, Or., Frank Cass.
  18. Stone D. and M. Garnett (1998). Think tanks, policy advice and governance. In: Stone, Denham and Garnett (eds.), (1998): 1-20.
  19. Stone D., Denham A. and M. Garnett (eds.). (1998), Think tanks across nations. A comparative approach, Manchester and New York, Manchester University Press.
  20. Wallace W. (1998). Conclusion: ideas and influence. In: Stone, Denham and Garnett (eds.), (1998): 223-230.

  • Selective Neoliberalism: How Italy Went from Dualization to Liberalisation in Labour Market and Pension Reforms Emanuele Ferragina, Alessandro Arrigoni, in New Political Economy /2021 pp.964
    DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2020.1865898
  • An intellectual boost for Italy’s Europeanisation: the contribution of the influential think tanks Arel and Nomisma (1978–1993) Luca Sandonà, in The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought /2021 pp.324
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2020.1817118

Piero Bini, Economic expertise and policy beliefs - The think tanks of the Italian economy from the social conflict of the 1970s to the Maastricht Treaty in "HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY" 2/2017, pp 5-23, DOI: 10.3280/SPE2017-002001