Journal title RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Author/s Peter Sperber
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/4 Language English
Pages 10 P. 597-606 File size 41 KB
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
In this article the Author introduces a historiographical thesis that is of general importance for understanding canon-formation in the history of philosophy. This is the thesis that, while historians of philosophy tend to look primarily at philosophical successes, philosophical failures, and failed syntheses in particular, can contribute just as significantly to the lasting influence of a philosopher. He illustrates this thesis by examining the reception of one of the most prominent examples of (what was originally broadly perceived as) a failed synthesis: Kant’s synthesis of empiricism and rationalism. In particular, the Author argues that this perceived failure contributed importantly to an original and diverse reception of Kant’s philosophy and thereby also to the latter’s lasting influence.
Keywords: Kant, Fichte, Fries, rationalism, empiricism, synthesis, historiography, reception.
Peter Sperber, There’s no Success like Failure: On the early Reception of Kant’s most famous Synthesis in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 4/2017, pp 597-606, DOI: 10.3280/SF2017-004005