University value for sustainability: What do stakeholders perceive? An Italian case study

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Maria Bonaventura Forleo, Nadia Palmieri
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/2 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 16 P. 103-118 Dimensione file 219 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2017-002008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The study focuses on stakeholders’ perception about the university role in pro-moting a regional development along a sustainable path. The opinions of the University of Molise (IT) teaching staff together with external stakeholders were jointly investigated. Both believed that the University should strengthen its role, but their opinions differed about which activities should to be prioritised - education for external stakeholders, research for teachers -. The importance of the third mission did not emerge. The University role for enhancing the environmental dimension of sustainability was perceived better than that for the social dimension. The diverging views of stakeholders highlight the need for a more systematic and integrated involvement of all relevant actors before starting a formal process toward sustainability.

Il lavoro indaga la percezione del valore e del ruolo delle Università nella promozione di uno sviluppo regionale sostenibile, muovendo dal caso di studio dell’Università del Molise. Le opinioni del personale docente e degli stakeholder esterni sono congiuntamente rilevate. Entrambi i gruppi ritengono che l’Università potrebbe intensificare il suo ruolo, ma le opinioni differiscono circa le attività istituzionali prioritarie - la formazione per gli stakeholder esterni, la ricerca per il personale docente -. La percezione del ruolo dell’Università a sostegno della dimensione ambientale prevale su quella a favore della dimensione sociale della sosteni-bilità. Modesta è l’attenzione verso la terza missione. Le divergenti opinioni sotto-lineano la necessità di un coinvolgimento sistematico di tutti gli stakeholder rile-vanti prima di avviare processi formali di sostenibilità.

Keywords:Ruolo dell’Università, sviluppo sostenibile, opinioni degli stakeholder, personale docente, stakeholder esterni, caso di studio, Molise.

  1. Acqui E. (2016). The Regional Mission of Universities. Quality-Access to Success, Supplement 2(17): 20-28.
  2. Aleixo A.M., Azeiteiro U.M., Leal S. (2015). Toward sustainability through higher education: sustainable development incorporation into Portuguese higher education institutions. In: Davim J.P., Leal Filho W. (Eds.). Challenges in higher education for sustainability. Springer Int. Publishing, 159-187.
  3. Amaral L.P., Martins N., Gouvela J.B. (2015). Quest for a sustainable university: a review. Int. J. Sust. Higher Ed., 16(2): 155-172.
  4. Barth M. and Michelsen G. (2012). Learning for change: an educational contribution to sustainability science. Sustain. Sci., 8(1): 103-119.
  5. Barth M., Rieckmann M. (2012). Academic staff development as a catalyst for curriculum change towards education for sustainable development: an output perspective. J. Clean. Prod., 26: 28-36.
  6. Brinkhurst M., Rose P., Maurice G., Ackerman J.D. (2011). Achieving campus sustainability: top-down, bottom-up, or neither? Int. J. Sust. Higher Ed., 12(4): 338-354.
  7. Cebrián G., Grace M., Humphris D. (2015). Academic staff engagement in education for sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod., 106: 79-86.
  8. Clark C.R. (2016). Collective action competence: an asset to campus sustainability. Int. J. Sust. Higher Ed., 17(4): 559-578.
  9. Disterheft A., Caeiro S., Azeiteiro U.M., Leal Filho W., (2015). Participatory processes in sustainable universities – what to assess. Int. J. Sust. Higher Ed., 16(5): 748-771.
  10. Dlouhá J., Barton A., Huisingh D., Adomßent M. (2013). Learning for sustainable development in regional networks. J. Clean. Prod., 49: 1-4.
  11. European Commission (2011). Supporting growth and jobs. An agenda for the modernization of Europe’s higher education systems. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions, COM (2011). 567 final. -- Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/education/library/policy/modernisation_en.pdf (accessed 7 July 2016).
  12. Hou D. (2016). Divergence in stakeholder perception of sustainable remediation. Sustain. Sci., 11(2): 215-230.
  13. Karatzoglou B. (2013). An in-depth literature review of the evolving roles and contributions of universities to education for sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod., 49: 44-53.
  14. Katehi L.P.B. (2012). A university culture of sustainability: principle, practice and economic driver. In: Weber L.E. and Duderstadt J.J. (Eds.). Global Sustainability and the Responsibilities of Universities. London, Paris, Geneva: Economica Editions Glion Colloquium. Series 7, 153-166.
  15. Kauffman J., Arico S. (2014). New directions in sustainability science: promoting integration and cooperation. Sustain. Sci., 9(4): 413-418.
  16. Krizek K.J., Newport D., White J., Townsend A.R. (2012). Higher education’s sustainability imperative: how to practically respond? Int. J. Sust. Higher Ed., 13(1): 19-33.
  17. Leal Filho W. (2011). About the role of universities and their contribution to sustainable development. High Educ. Pol., 24(4): 427-438.
  18. Leal Filho W., Lozano R., Ceulemans K., Alonso-Almeida M.D.M., Huisingh D., Lozano- García F.J., Waas T., Lambrechts W., Lukman R. and Hug J. (2014). A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. J. Clean. Prod., 108, Part A: 1-18.
  19. Leal Filho W., Brandii L. (2016). Engaging Stakeholders for Sustainable Development. -- Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290429947_Engaging_Stakeholders_for_Sustainable_Development.pdf (accessed 10 May 2016).
  20. Mainardes E.W., Alves E., Raposo M. (2010). An exploratory research on the stakeholders of a university. J. Manag. Strategy, 1(1): 76-88.
  21. Miller T.R., Wiek A., Sarewitz D., Robinson J., Olsson L., Kriebel D., Loorbach D. (2014). The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda, Sustain. Sci., 9(2): 239-246.
  22. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Manag. Rev., 22(4): 853-886.
  23. Nussbaum M.C. (2012). Educare per il profitto o per la libertà? Bologna: il Muli-no.
  24. Orecchini F., Valitutti V., Vitali G. (2012). Industry and academia for a transition towards sustainability: advancing sustainability science through university-business collaborations. Sustain. Sci., 7(1): 57-73.
  25. Pattberg P., Widerberg O. (2014). Transnational multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development. Building blocks for success. IVM Institute for Environmental Studies Report, R-14/31, -- available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264833767_Transnational_multi-stakehold-er_partnerships_for_sustainable_development_Building_blocks_for_success (accessed 20 June 2016).
  26. Peterlin J., Dimovski V., Penger S. (2013). Creation of Sustainable Leadership Development, Manag. Glob. Transitions, 11(2): 201-216.
  27. Ribeiro M.M., Hoover E., Burford G., Buchebner J., Lindenthal T. (2016). Values as a bridge between sustainability and institutional assessment. Int. J. Sust. Higher Ed., 17(1): 40-53.
  28. Riccaboni A., Trovarelli F. (2014). Transition Towards Sustainable Development: the role of Universities. In: Leal Filho W., Brandli L., Kuznetsova O., and Finisterran do Paço A.M. (Eds.). Integrative Approaches to Sustainable Develop-ment at University Level. World Sustainability Series 2015. Springer International Publishing, 293-305.
  29. Sammalisto K., Sundström A., Holm T. (2015). Implementation of sustainability in universities as perceived by faculty and staff – a model from a Swedish university. J. Clean. Prod., 106: 45-54.
  30. Segalàs J., Mulder K.F., Ferrer-Balas D. (2012). What do EESD “experts” think sustainability is? Which pedagogy is suitable to learn it? Results from interviews and Cmaps analysis gathered at EESD 2008. Int. J. Sust. Higher Ed., 13(3): 293-304.
  31. Scholz R.W., Steiner G. (2015). The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes – part I-theoretical foundations. Sustain. Sci., 10(4): 527-544.
  32. Sidiropoulos E. (2014). Education for sustainability in business education programs: a question of value. J. Clean. Prod., 85: 472-487.
  33. Syed K.U., Hamdan S.B., Iqbal A., Al-Muz-Zammil Y., Roslee A., Faizah A.G. (2014). Role of Academic Administrators in Decision Making Processes for Sustainability, World Appl. Sci. J., 32(9): 1852-1857.
  34. Sylvestre P., Wright T. and Sherren K. (2014). A Tale of Two (or More) Sustainabilities: A Q methodology study of University professors perspectives on sustainable Universities. Sustainability, 6(3): 1521-1543.
  35. Trencher G., Yarime M., Mccormick K.B., Doll C.N.H., Kraines S.B. (2014). Be-yond the third mission: exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Sci. Public Pol., 41(2): 151-179.
  36. Vagnoni E., Cavicchi C. (2015). An exploratory study of sustainable development at Italian universities. Int. J. Sust. Higher Ed., 16(2): 217-236.
  37. van Kerkoff L. (2014). Developing integrative research of sustainability science through a complexity-principles-based approach. Sustain. Sci., 9(2): 143-155.
  38. Verhulst E., Lambrechts W. (2014). Fostering the incorporation of sustainable development in higher education. Lessons learned from a change management perspective. J. Clean. Prod., 106: 189-204.
  39. Wals A.E.J. (2014). Sustainability in higher education in the context of the UN DESD: a review of learning and institutionalization processes. J. Clean. Prod., 62: 8-15.
  40. Weber L.E. (2012). Universities, hard and soft sciences: all key pillars of Global Sustainability. In: Weber L.E. and Duderstadt J.J. (Eds.). Global Sustainability and the Responsibilities of Universities. London, Paris, Genève: Economica Editions Glion Colloquium Series, 3-14.
  41. Wiek A., Harlow J., Melnick R., van der Leeuw S., Fukushi K., Takeuchi K., Farioli F., Yamba F., Blake A., Geiger C., Kutter R. (2015). Sustainability science in action: a review of the state of the field through case studies on disaster recovery, bioenergy, and precautionary purchasing. Sustain. Sci., 10(1): 17-31.
  42. Wittmayer J.M. (2014). Action, research and participation: roles of researcher in sustainability transitions, Sustain. Sci., 9(4): 483-496.
  43. Wooltorton S., Wilkinson A., Horwitz P., Bahn S., Redmond J., Dooley J. (2015). Sustainability and action research in universities, Int. J. Sust. Higher Ed., 16(4): 424-439.
  44. Wu Y.C., Shen J.P. (2016). Higher education for sustainable development: a systematic review, Int. J. Sust. Higher Ed., 17(5): 633-651.
  45. Yarime M., Trencher G., Mino T., Scholz R.W., Olsson L., Ness B., Frantzeskaki N., Rotmans J. (2012). Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards and integration of academic development, institutionalization and stakeholder collaboration. Sustain. Sci., 7(1): 101-113.

Maria Bonaventura Forleo, Nadia Palmieri, University value for sustainability: What do stakeholders perceive? An Italian case study in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2/2017, pp 103-118, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2017-002008