Libertà e natura nelle serie fenomeniche

Author/s Anselmo Aportone
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/1 Language Italian
Pages 40 P. 79-118 File size 211 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2018-001004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Freedom and Nature in the Series of Phenomena. The Article offers a reading of the third antinomy according to which its resolution contains a true paradox, in the positive sense suggested by Emilio Garroni. The relationship between thesis and antithesis - two opposite, but not contradictory, propositions with the same subject understood in different ways and both to be considered true on the basis of theoretical arguments in one case and of practical reasons in the other - brings about a deeper understanding of human reason and experience. Yet our intelligence cannot really explain, and much less make evident, how freedom can exist in the same domain of phenomena. An argument derived from Note 5662 on miracles seems to add even a specifically Kantian reason in support of the impossibility that a noumenal cause, such as freedom, intervenes in the series of phenomena, which are essentially and inevitably determined by natural causality (otherwise, they would lose any temporal identification and objectivity). Nonetheless, it is actually useful to highlight the difference between the case of the miracle and that of freedom as the latter does not, according to Kant, question the necessity-without-exception of the laws of nature. Finally, the distance of his conception - the relationship of non-contradiction and transcendental compatibility between causality of nature and of freedom, which in no way attempts to homogenize the two concepts - from contemporary forms of compatibilism is pointed out.

Keywords: Antinomy, transcendental freedom, causality of nature, paradox, series, time

  1. - KGS: Immanuel Kant, Gesammelte Schriften, Hrsg. Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Bd. 1-22), Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften (Bd. 23), Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (Bd. 24 ff.), de Gruyter, Berlin 1900 ff.
  2. - Al-Azm 1972: Sadik J. Al-Azm, The Origins of Kant’s Arguments in the Antinomies, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1972.
  3. - Allais 2015: Lucy Allais, Manifest Reality. Kant’s Idealism and his Realism, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
  4. - Allison 1998: Henry E. Allison, The Antinomy of Pure Reason, Sections 9 (A 515/B 543-A 567/B595), in Mohr-Willaschek 1998, pp. 465-90.
  5. - Beck 1960: Lewis White Beck, A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1960.
  6. - Beck 1987: Id., Five Concepts of Freedom in Kant, in Jan T.J. Srzednicki (ed.), Stephan Körner-Philosophical Analysis and Recontruction, Kluwer, Jingham 1987, pp. 35-51.
  7. - Beckmann 1996: Jan P. Beckmann, Allmacht, Freiheit und Vernunft. Zur Frage nach »rationalen Konstanten« im Denken des späten Mittelalters, in Jan P. Beckmann, Ludger Honnefelder, Gangolf Schrimpf und Georg Wieland, Philosophie im Mittelalter. Entwicklungslinien und Paradigmen, Meiner, Hamburg 1996, pp. 275-294.
  8. - Bonaccini 2015: Juan A. Bonaccini, Kant’s Account of Miracles in his Lectures on Metaphysics, in Ubirajara Rancan de Azevedo Marques, Robert Louden, Claudio La Rocca & Bernd Dörflinger (eds.), Kant’s Lectures / Kants Vorlesungen, De Gruyter, Berlin-New York 2015, pp. 247-260.
  9. - Bojanowski 2006: Jochen Bojanowski, Kants Theorie der Freiheit. Rekonstruktion und Rehabilitierung, de Gruyter, Berlin-New York 2006.
  10. - Bröcker 1970: Walter Bröcker, Kant über Metaphysik und Erfahrung, Klostermann, Frankfurt a.M. 1970. Burns 1983: Robert M. Burns, The Great Debate on Miracles: From Joseph Glanvill to David Hume, Bucknell University Press, Lewisburg 1983.
  11. - Canziani-Granada-Zarka 2000: Guido Canziani, Miguel A. Granada e Yves C. Zarka (a cura di), Potentia Dei. L’onnipotenza divina nel pensiero dei secoli XVI e XVII, F. Angeli, Milano 2000.
  12. - Clarke, Capes 2017: Randolph Clarke, Justin Capes, Incompatibilist (Nondeterministic) Theories of Free Will, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
  13. - De Caro 2002: Mario De Caro (a cura di), Logica della liberta, Meltemi, Roma 2002.
  14. - De Caro 2004: Id., Il libero arbitrio. Una introduzione, Laterza, Roma-Bari 2004.
  15. - De Caro-Mori-Spinelli 2014: Mario De Caro, Massimo Mori, Emidio Spinelli (a cura di), Libero arbitrio. Storia di una controversia filosofica, Carocci, Roma 2014.
  16. - Dennett 2003: Daniel Dennett, Freedom Evolves, Viking, New York 2003.
  17. - Düsing 2006: Klaus Düsing, Spontaneität und sittliche Freiheit bei Kant und Fichte, in Edith und Klaus Düsing, Hans-Dieter Klein (Hrsg.), Geist und Willensfreiheit. Klassische Theorien von der Antike bis zur Moderne, Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg 2006, pp. 107-26.
  18. - Falkenberg 2000: Brigitte Falkenberg, Kants Kosmologie. Die wissenschaftliche Revolution der Naturphilosophie im 18. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt a.M. 2000.
  19. - Fantasia 2015: Francesca Fantasia, Il tempo dell’agire libero. Dimensioni della filosofia pratica in Kant, Edizioni ETS, Pisa 2015.
  20. - Fisher 1994: John M. Fisher, The Metaphysics of Free Will, Blackwell, Oxford 1994.
  21. - Frankfurt 1969: Harry G. Frankfurt, Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility, in «Journal of Philosophy» (1969), pp. 828-839.
  22. - Frankfurt 1971: Id., Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person, in «Journal of Philosophy» (1971), pp. 5-20.
  23. - Garroni 1982: Emilio Garroni, I paradossi dell’esperienza, in Enciclopedia Einaudi, vol. XV: Sistematica, Einaudi, Torino 1982, pp. 867-915.
  24. - Garroni 1986: Id., Senso e paradosso. L’estetica, una filosofia non speciale, Laterza, Roma-Bari 1986.
  25. - Garroni 2003: Id., L’indeterminatezza semantica, una questione liminare, in Id., L’arte e l’altro dall’arte, Laterza, Roma-Bari 2003.
  26. - Henrich 1955: Dieter Henrich, Über die Einheit der Subjektivität. M. Heidegger und das Problem der Metaphysik, «Philosophische Rundschau» (1955), pp. 28-69.
  27. - Hofer 2002: Carl Hofer, Freedom From the Inside Out, in Craig Callender (ed.), Time, Reality and Experience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002, pp. 201–222.
  28. - Höffe 2010: Otfried Höffe, Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. The Foundation of Modern Philosophy, Springer, Dordrecht 2010.
  29. - Ismael 2016: Jenann T. Ismael, How Physics Makes Us Free, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016.
  30. - Kant 1821: Immanuel Kant’s Vorlesungen über die Metaphysik, hrsg. von Karl H.L. Pölitz, Keyser, Erfurt 1821.
  31. - Kant 1969: Id., Antropologia pragmatica, trad. it. di Augusto Guerra, Laterza, Roma-Bari 1969.
  32. - Kant 1979: Id., Critica della ragion pratica, trad. it. di Francesco Capra, rivista da Eugenio Garin, Laterza, Roma-Bari 1979.
  33. - Kant 1980: Id., La religione entro i limiti della sola ragione, trad. it. di Alfredo Poggi, riv. da Marco M. Olivetti, Roma-Bari 1980.
  34. - Kant 1984: Id., Logica, a cura di Leonardo Amoroso, Laterza, Roma-Bari 1984.
  35. - Kant 1994: Id., Contro Eberhard. La polemica sulla Critica della ragion pura, a cura di Claudio La Rocca, Biblioteca di «Studi Kantiani», Giardini, Pisa 1994.
  36. - Kant 1995: Id., Scritti di storia, politica e diritto, a cura di Filippo Gonnelli, Laterza, Roma-Bari 1995.
  37. -Kant 1999: Id., Critica della facoltà di giudizio, a cura di Emilio Garroni e Hansmichael Hohenegger, Einaudi, Torino 1999.
  38. - Kant 2003: Id., Fondazione della metafisica dei costumi, a cura di Vittorio Mathieu, Bompiani, Milano 2003.
  39. - Kant 2004: Id., Critica della ragion pura, a cura di Costantino Esposito, Bompiani, Milano 2004.
  40. - Kant 2016: Id., Prolegomeni ad ogni futura metafisica che si possa presentarsi come scienza, a cura di Renato Pettoello, La Scuola, Milano 2016.
  41. - Kawamura 1996: Katsutoshi Kawamura, Spontaneität und Willkür. Der Freiheitsbegriff in Kants Antinomienlehre und seine historischen Wurzeln, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, Frommann-Holzboog 1996.
  42. - Kreimendahl 1998: Lothar Kreimendahl, Die Antinomie der reinen Vernunft, 1. Und 2. Abschnitt (A 405/B 432.A 461/B 489), in Mohr-Willaschek 1998, pp. 413-46.
  43. - Lewis 1981: David Lewis, Are We Free to Break the Laws?, «Teoria» 47 (1981), pp. 113-21.
  44. - Lukasiewicz 1967: Jan Lukasiewicz, On determinism, in Storrs McCall (ed.), Polish Logic: 1920-1939, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1967, pp. 19-39.
  45. - Malzkorn 1999: Wolfgang Malzkorn, Kants Kosmologie-Kritik. Eine formale Analyse der Antinomienlehre, de Gruyter, Berlin New York. 1999.
  46. - McKenna 2015: Michael McKenna, D. Justin Coates, Compatibism, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
  47. - Mellor 1991: David Hugh Mellor, Causation and the Direction of Time, «Erkenntnis » 35 (1991), pp. 191-203.
  48. - Mohr-Willaschek 1998: Georg Mohr, Marcus Willaschek (Hrsg.), Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 1998.
  49. - Munzel 1999: G. Felicitas Munzel, Kant’s Conception of Moral Character. The “Critical” Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London 1999.
  50. - Plantinga 1977: Alvin Plantinga, God, Freedom, and Evil, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans 1977.
  51. - Proust 2005: Joëlle Proust, La nature de la volonté, Paris, Folio-Gallimard 2005.
  52. - Schmucker 1990: Josef Schmucker, Das Weltproblem in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Bonn, Bouvier 1990.
  53. - Schlesinger: George Schlesinger, The Unpredictability of Free Choices, «British Journal for the Philosophy of Science» 25 (1974), n. 3, pp. 209-221.
  54. - Schwaiger 1999: Clemens Schwaiger: Kategorische und andere Imperative. Zur Entwicklung von Kants praktischer Philosophie bis 1785, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt 1999.
  55. - Specht 1996: Rainer Specht, Naturgesetz und Bindung Gottes, in Jan P. Beckmann, Ludger Honnefelder, Gangolf Schrimpf und Georg Wieland, Philosophie im Mittelalter. Entwicklungslinien und Paradigmen, Meiner, Hamburg 1996, pp. 409-424.
  56. - Stark 1993: Werner Stark, Nachforschungen zu Briefen und Handschriften Immanuel Kants, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 1993.
  57. - Statman 1993: Daniel Statman (ed.), Moral Luck, State University of New York Press, Albany 1993.
  58. - Strawson 1962: Peter Frederick Strawson, Freedom and Resentment, «Proceedings of the British Academy», 48 (1962), pp. 187-211, ristampato in Id., Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, Routledge, New York 2008.
  59. - Strawson 1966: Id., The Bounds of Sense. An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Meuthen 1966; Routledge, London-New York 2006.
  60. - Stump 1996: Eleonore Stump, Persons: Identification and Freedom, in «Philosophical Topics» (1996), pp. 183-214.
  61. - Timmermann 2003: Jens Timmermann, Sittengesetz und Freiheit, de Gruyter, Berlin-New York 2003.
  62. - Tognini 1997: Giorgio Tognini, Azione e fenomeno. La dottrina kantiana della libertà nelle interpretazioni anglosassoni, Pantograf, Genova 1997.
  63. - Vihvelin 2011: Kadri Vihvelin, Arguments for Incompatibism, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
  64. - Van Inwagen 1983, Peter van Inwagen, An Essay on Free Will, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1983.
  65. - Van Inwagen 2000: Id., Free Will Remains a Mistery, in «Philosophical Perspectives» (2000), pp. 1-19.
  66. - Watkins 1998: Eric Watkins, The Antinomy of Pure Reason, Sections 3-8 (A 462/B 490-A 515/B 543), in Mohr-Willaschek 1998, pp. 447-64.
  67. - Wright 1974: Georg Henrik von Wright, Causality and Determinism, Columbia University Press, New York-London 1974.

Anselmo Aportone, Libertà e natura nelle serie fenomeniche in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 1/2018, pp 79-118, DOI: 10.3280/SF2018-001004