Assessing the efficiency of aquaculture cooperatives. A country case study

Author/s Maria Bonaventura Forleo, Luca Romagnoli, Nadia Palmieri, Angela Di Nocera
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/2
Language English Pages 16 P. 205-220 File size 142 KB
DOI 10.3280/ECAG2018-002006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The aquaculture sector contributes to global food supply and provides an important source of animal protein. Even though the Italian sector has a great potential, from 2008 to 2014 the total volume decreased by 8%. Efficiency improvements may be one factor able to foster the development of the sector. The study aims to estimate the efficiency of the Italian aquaculture cooperatives that represent an important segment of the sector, and to assess differences in efficiency scores according to farms size and location. Descriptive statistics for the population of Italian cooperatives were showed based on budget data. An output oriented Data Envelopment Analysis was carried out for a sample of cooperatives. Results showed a great variability among firms in terms of budget and efficiency indicators. Around 40% of firms registered an efficient value under the variable return to scale hypothesis, and about 21% under the constant return to scale hypothesis. Study findings showed that there is an ample room for improving firms’ efficiency. Size is more important than location in relation to the performance of cooperatives. Cooperatives of smaller size and units located in the Italian Northern regions showed a greater inefficiency.

Keywords: Aquaculture cooperatives, efficiency analysis, data envelopment analysis, Italy; size

Jel codes: Q22, D24, L250

  1. Alam, Md.F. (2011). Measuring technical, allocative and cost efficiency of pangas (Pangasius hypophthalmus: Sauvage 1878) fish farmers of Bangladesh. Aquaculture Research, 42, 1487-1500.
  2. Alam, Md.F., & Murshed-e-Jahan, K. (2008). Resource allocation efficiency of the prawn-carp farmers of Bangladesh. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 12, 188-206. DOI: 10.1080/13657300802332976
  3. Asche, F. (2017). New markets, new technologies and new opportunities in aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 21(1), 1-8. doi : 10.1080/13657305.2016.1272649.
  4. Boatto, V., & Pellizzato, M. (2005). La filiera della vongola Tapes philippinarum in Italia. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  5. Bonazzi, G., & Iotti, M. (2014). Interest coverage ratios (ICRs) and financial sustainability: application to firms with dairy livestock. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 9, 482-489.
  6. Castellini, A., De Boni, A., Gaviglio, A., Mauracher, C., Ragazzoni, A., & Roma, R. (2012). Prospects and challenges for development of organic fish farming in Italy. New Medit, 11(4), 23-26.
  7. Cataudella, S., & Spagnolo, M. (2011). The state of Italian marine fisheries and aquaculture. Rome: Ministero delle Politiche Agricole, Alimentari e Forestali (MiPAAF).
  8. Chang, H.H., Boisvert, R.N., & Ling-Yi, H. (2010). Land subsidence, production efficiency, and the decision of aquacultural firms in Taiwan to discontinue production. Ecological Economics, 69(12), 2448-2456.
  9. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  10. Crea (2015). Annuario dell’agricoltura italiana. Cap. 29. Centro Politiche e Bioeconomia, Roma.
  11. Di Trapani, A.M., Sgroi, F., Testa R., & Tudisca, S. (2014). Economic comparison between offshore and in-shore aquaculture production systems of European sea bass in Italy. Aquaculture, 434, 334-339.
  12. Fao (2016a). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Rome. -- Retrieved from, accessed 01.09.2017.
  13. Fao (2016b). National Aquaculture Sector Overview Italy. -- Retrieved from
  14. Fao (2014). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome. 223 pp.
  15. Farrell, M.O. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-281. DOI: 10.2307/2343100
  16. Furesi, R., Madau, F.A., & Pulina, P. (2016). Profitability and efficiency of the Sardinian fisheries: an analysis on cooperatives. 53rd sidea Conference 22-24 September 2016.
  17. Guillen, J., Natale, F., & Fernández Polanco, J.M. (2015). Estimating the economic performance of the EU aquaculture sector. Aquaculture International, 23, 1387-1400.
  18. Guzmán, I., & Arcas, N. (2008). The usefulness of accounting information in the measurement of technical efficiency in agricultural cooperatives. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 79(1), 107-131.
  19. Guzmán, I., Arcas, N., Ghelfi, R., & Rivaroli, S. (2009). Technical efficiency in the fresh fruit and vegetable sector: A comparison study of Italian and Spanish firms. Fruits, 64(4), 243-252.
  20. Hassanpour, B., Ismail, M.M., Mohamed, Z., & Kamarulzaman, N.H. (2010). Sources of productivity growth in rainbow trout aquaculture in Iran: technical efficiency change or technological progress? Aquaculture Economics & Management, 14, 218-234. DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2010.503474
  21. Iliyasu, A., Mohamed, Z.A., Ismail, M.M., Amin, A.M., Kamarudin, S.M., & Mazuki, H. (2014). A review of production frontier research in aquaculture (2001-2011). Aquaculture Economics & Management, 18, 221-247. DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2014.926464
  22. Iliyasu, A., Mohamed, Z.A., Ismail, M.M., Amin, A.M., & Mazuki, H. (2016). Technical efficiency of cage fish farming in Peninsular Malaysia: a stochastic frontier production approach. Aquaculture Research, 47(1), 101-113.
  23. Iotti, M., & Bonazzi, G. (2015). Profitability and financial sustainability analysis in Italian aquaculture firms by application of economic and financial margins. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 10(1), 18-34.
  24. John, S.L., Louis, Y.Y.L., Wen-Min, L., & Bruce, J.Y.L. (2013). A survey of DEA applications. Omega, 41(5), 893-902.
  25. Madau, F.A., Idda, L., & Pulina, P. (2009). Capacity and economic efficiency in small-scale fisheries: Evidence from the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Policy, 33(5), 860-867.
  26. Malorgio, G., Mulazzani, L., Pugliese, P., Rota, C., Zanasi, C., & Zuccaro, M. (2017). The role of small-scale fisheries in Mediterranean coastal communities. An analytical framework for their development. New Medit, 16(2), 1-26.
  27. MiPAAF (2014). Piano Strategico per l’acquacoltura in Italia 2014-20. – Retrieved from
  28. Nguyen, K.T., & Fisher, T.C.G. (2014). Efficiency analysis and the effect of pollution on shrimp farms in the Mekong River Delta. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 18(4), 325-343. DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2014.959209
  29. Nielsen, R. (2011). Green and technical efficient growth in Danish fresh water aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 15(4), 262-277. DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2011.624574
  30. Panunzi, G.M. (2014). Analisi finanziaria e modelli di servizio per il recupero della redditività delle cooperative di pesca. Trento: Edizioni del Faro.
  31. Santulli, A., & Modica, A. (2009). Aquaculture in Sicily: The state of the art. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(2), 829-837.
  32. Shawn, A. & PingSun, L. (2008). A Technical Efficiency Analysis of Hawaii’s Aquaculture Industry. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 45(3), 312-321.
  33. stecf (2016). Economic report of EU aquaculture sector. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. DOI: 10.2788/677322
  34. Theodoridis, A., Batzios, C., Ragkos, A., & Angelidis, P. (2017). Technical efficiency measurement of mussel aquaculture in Greece. Aquaculture International, 25(3), 1025-1037.
  35. Zongli, Z., Yanan, Z., Feifan, L., Hui, Y., Yongming, Y. & Xinhua, Y. (2016). Economic efficiency of small-scale tilapia farms in Guangxi, China. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 21(2), 283-294. DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2016.1180644
  36. Wang, P., & Ji, J. (2017). Research on China’s mariculture efficiency evaluation and influencing factors with undesirable outputs – an empirical analysis of China’s ten coastal regions. Aquaculture International, 25(1),

  • Analyzing factors affecting the technical efficiency of small-scale seaweed farms using a two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach Marvin Louie G. Orbeta, Larry N. Digal, Ivi Jaquelyn T. Astronomo, Carol Q. Balgos, Shemaiah Gail P. Placencia, Melissa P. Loquias, Paolo Enrico Codog, in Journal of Applied Aquaculture /2023 pp.123
    DOI: 10.1080/10454438.2021.1945520
  • The Introduction of Insect Meal into Fish Diet: The First Economic Analysis on European Sea Bass Farming Brunella Arru, Roberto Furesi, Laura Gasco, Fabio Madau, Pietro Pulina, in Sustainability /2019 pp.1697
    DOI: 10.3390/su11061697
  • Assessing the efficiency of the Italian aquaculture firms Maria Bonaventura Forleo, Luca Romagnoli, Rosa Maria Fanelli, Nadia Palmieri, Angela Di Nocera, in Aquaculture Economics & Management /2019 pp.382
    DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2019.1641569
  • Efficiency data analysis in EU aquaculture production Ester Gutiérrez, Sebastián Lozano, Jordi Guillén, in Aquaculture 734962/2020 pp.734962
    DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734962
  • Environmental Attributes of Wild versus Farmed Tuna: Beliefs, Knowledge and Purchasing Choices of Italian Consumers of Canned Tuna Maria B. Forleo, Nadia Palmieri, in Sustainability /2023 pp.7149
    DOI: 10.3390/su15097149

Maria Bonaventura Forleo, Luca Romagnoli, Nadia Palmieri, Angela Di Nocera, Assessing the efficiency of aquaculture cooperatives. A country case study in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 2/2018, pp 205-220, DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2018-002006