Self-presentation and emotional contagion on Facebook: new experimental measures of profiles’ emotional coherence

Titolo Rivista PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’
Autori/Curatori Elena Serritella, Mirko Duradoni, Elisa Guidi
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2022/2 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 21 P. 13-33 Dimensione file 233 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSC2022-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Social Networks allow users to self-present by sharing personal content, and emotions expressed in a post affect the subsequent posts, eliciting a congruent emotion. The main goals of this research were to investigate the emotional coherence between wall posts and their comments on SNSs and to evaluate the association between the profiles’ General Emotional Coherence and self-presentation styles from a sample of adolescent’s Facebook profiles (n = 50; Mage = 16.95; 50% female). Two new experimental metrics were developed, describing the emotional load (positive and negative) of posts and comments, and the mood correspondence between them. The combination of these measures was used to define the profiles’ "General Emotional Coherence". Results confirm how publishing an emotional post corresponds to receiving comments with a coherent mood. The more "emotionally coherent" profiles are characterized by a typical self-presentation style (more posts, more comments and likes).

I social network permettono agli utenti di auto-presentarsi condividendo contenuti perso-nali; le emozioni condivise influenzano i post successivi, suscitando un’emozione congruente. Gli obiettivi principali di questa ricerca sono stati: (i) indagare la coerenza emotiva tra i post in bacheca e i loro commenti sui SNS, e (ii) valutare l’associazione tra la Coerenza Emotiva Ge-nerale dei profili e gli stili di autopresentazione su un campione di profili Facebook di adole-scenti (n = 50; età media = 16.95; 50% di sesso femminile), costruendo due nuove metriche per la valutazione del carico emotivo (positivo e negativo) di post e commenti e della loro cor-rispondenza emotiva. La combinazione di queste misure generava la "Coerenza Emotiva Generale" dei profili. I risultati confermano che pubblicare un post emotivo corrisponde a ricevere commenti con uno stato d’animo coerente. Inoltre, i profili più "emotivamente coerenti" sono caratterizzati da un tipico stile di auto-presentazione (più post, più commenti e like).

Keywords:social networks, dinamiche virtuali, auto-presentazione, contagio emotivo, co-municazione mediata da computer, ambienti virtuali

  1. Kucuktunc, O., Cambazoglu, B. B., Weber, I., & Ferhatosmanoglu, H. (2012). A large-scale sentiment analysis for Yahoo! answers. Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 633-642. DOI: 10.1145/2124295.2124371
  2. Masch, L., & Gabriel, O. W. (2020). How emotional displays of political leaders shape citizen attitudes: the case of German chancellor Angela Merkel. German Politics, 29(2), 158-179. DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2019.1657096
  3. Niland, P., Lyons, A. C., Goodwin, I., & Hutton, F. (2015). Friendship work on Facebook: Young adults’ understandings and practices of friendship. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(2), 123-137.
  4. O’Sullivan, P. B. (2005). Masspersonal communication: Rethinking the mass interpersonal divide. Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association. New York.
  5. Parmar, N., Dong, L., & Eisingerich, A. B. (2018). Connecting with your dentist on Facebook: patients’ and dentists’ attitudes towards social media usage in dentistry. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(6), e10109. DOI: 10.2196/10109
  6. Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. -- www.LIWC.Net
  7. Pera, A. (2018). Psychopathological processes involved in social comparison, depression, and envy on Facebook. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 22.
  8. Peräkylä, A., Henttonen, P., Voutilainen, L., Kahri, M., Stevanovic, M., Sams, M., & Ravaja, N. (2015). Sharing the emotional load: Recipient affiliation calms down the storyteller. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78(4), 301-323. DOI: 10.1177/0190272515611054
  9. Richardson, K., & Hessey, S. (2009). Archiving the self? Facebook as biography of social and relational memory. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 7(1), 25-38. DOI: 10.1108/14779960910938070
  10. Rosenbusch, H., Evans, A. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2019). Multilevel emotion transfer on YouTube: Disentangling the effects of emotional contagion and homophily on video audiences. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(8), 1028-1035. DOI: 10.1177/1948550618820309
  11. Scheffé, H. (1999). The analysis of variance (Vol. 72). NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Sullivan, D. G., & Masters, R. D. (1988). “Happy Warriors”: Leaders’ Facial Displays, Viewers’ Emotions, and Political Support. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 345-368.
  13. Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: Liwc and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24-54. DOI: 10.1177/0261927X09351676
  14. Thelwall, M. (2010). Emotion homophily in social network site messages. First Monday, 15(4).
  15. Van den Broek, E. L. (2013). Ubiquitous emotion-aware computing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(1), 53-67.
  16. Vijayalakshmi, V., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2012). Emotional contagion and its relevance to individual behavior and organizational processes: A position paper. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(3), 363-374.
  17. Yau, J. C., & Reich, S. M. (2019). “It’s just a lot of work”: Adolescents’ self-presentation norms and practices on Facebook and Instagram. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(1), 196-209.
  18. Krämer, N. C., & Haferkamp, N. (2011). Online self-presentation: Balancing privacy concerns and impression construction on social networking sites. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (eds.), Privacy online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web (pp. 127-141). Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_10
  19. Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(4), 201320040.
  20. Kramer, A. D. I. (2012). The spread of emotion via Facebook. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 767–770. DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2207787
  21. Kanjo, E., & Chamberlain, A. (2015). Emotions in context: examining pervasive affective sensing systems, applications, and analyses. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 19(7), 1197-1212.
  22. Jordán-Conde, Z., Mennecke, B., & Townsend, A. (2014). Late adolescent identity definition and intimate disclosure on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 356-366.
  23. Jones, P. E., Hoffman, L. H., & Young, D. G. (2013). Online emotional appeals and political participation: The effect of candidate affect on mass behavior. New Media & Society, 15(7), 1132-1150. DOI: 10.1177/146144481246671
  24. Horst, H. A., & Miller, D. (Eds.). (2020). Digital anthropology. London, UK: Routledge.
  25. Holtzman, N. S., Vazire, S., & Mehl, M. R. (2010). Sounds like a narcissist: Behavioral manifestations of narcissism in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 478-484.
  26. Hancock, J. T., Gee, K., Ciaccio, K., & Lin, J. M. H. (2008). I’m sad you’re sad: emotional contagion in cmc. Proceedings of the 2008 acm conference on computer supported cooperative work, 295-298. DOI: 10.1145/1460563.1460611
  27. Gump, B. B., & Kulik, J. A. (1997). Stress, affiliation, and emotional contagion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 305-319. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.305
  28. Guazzini, A., Cecchini, C., Guidi, E., Milani, M., & Meringolo, P. (2016). Excessive self-presentation on Facebook. Frontiers in Psychological and Behavioral Science, 5(1), 16-27.
  29. Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169-192.
  30. Goldenberg, A., & Gross, J. J. (2020). Digital emotion contagion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 316-328.
  31. Gil-Lopez, T., Shen, C., Benefield, G. A., Palomares, N. A., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2018). One size fits all: Context collapse, self-presentation strategies and language styles on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(3), 127-145.
  32. Dimberg, U., & Thunberg, M. (2012). Empathy, emotional contagion, and rapid facial reactions to angry and happy facial expressions. PsyCh Journal, 1(2), 118-127.
  33. DeWall, N. C., Buffardi, L. E., Bonser, I., & Keith Campbell, W. (2011). Narcissism and implicit attention seeking: Evidence from linguistic analyses of social networking and online presentation. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(1), 57-62.
  34. DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Chester, D. S., & Bushman, B. J. (2016). How often does currently felt emotion predict social behavior and judgment? a meta-analytic test of two theories. Emotion Review, 8(2), 136-143. DOI: 10.1177/1754073915572690
  35. Coviello, L., Sohn, Y., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Franceschetti, M., Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2014). Detecting emotional contagion in massive social networks. PloS one, 9(3), e90315.
  36. Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 605-616.
  37. Bazarova, N. N., Taft, J. G., Choi, Y. H., & Cosley, D. (2012). Managing impressions and relationships on Facebook: Self-presentational and relational concerns revealed through the analysis of language style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(2), 121-141. DOI: 10.1177/0261927X124563
  38. Barsade, S. G., Coutifaris, C. G., & Pillemer, J. (2018). Emotional contagion in organizational life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 137-151.
  39. Bareket-Bojmel, L., Moran, S., & Shahar, G. (2016). Strategic self-presentation on Facebook: Personal motives and audience response to online behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 788-795.

Elena Serritella, Mirko Duradoni, Elisa Guidi, Self-presentation and emotional contagion on Facebook: new experimental measures of profiles’ emotional coherence in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’" 2/2022, pp 13-33, DOI: 10.3280/PSC2022-002002