Journal title CADMO
Author/s Jo-Anne Baird, Adrian Coxell
Publishing Year 2009 Issue 2009/2 Language Italian
Pages 18 P. 105-122 File size 309 KB
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
Policy, Latent Error and Systemic Examination Failures - Politicians and civil servants are very much involved in examination developments in many countries. Policy development and implementation is notoriously difficult to unpick in terms of decision-making, roles and responsibilities. Nonetheless, three systemic examination failures are used to illustrate the problems caused by the policy context – in Scotland 2000, New Zealand 2004 and England 2008. Taking these cases and the literature together, it is argued that features of the policy environment conspire to generate latent errors: 1) evolving policy and competing perspectives; 2) lack of role clarity and diffusion of responsibility and 3) timeframe slippage. Human error theory indicates that to try to reduce errors we must understand their fundamental causes and that these usually run deeper than the first stories that are told. Understanding the full reasons for particular systemic examination errors is difficult because politics is slippery, and many perspectives have to be sifted.
Keywords: Assessment, system, management, politics, policy
Jo-Anne Baird, Adrian Coxell, Policy, Latent Error and Systemic Examination Failures in "CADMO" 2/2009, pp 105-122, DOI: 10.3280/CAD2009-002011