Policy, Latent Error and Systemic Examination Failures

Journal title CADMO
Author/s Jo-Anne Baird, Adrian Coxell
Publishing Year 2009 Issue 2009/2
Language Italian Pages 18 P. 105-122 File size 309 KB
DOI 10.3280/CAD2009-002011
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Policy, Latent Error and Systemic Examination Failures - Politicians and civil servants are very much involved in examination developments in many countries. Policy development and implementation is notoriously difficult to unpick in terms of decision-making, roles and responsibilities. Nonetheless, three systemic examination failures are used to illustrate the problems caused by the policy context – in Scotland 2000, New Zealand 2004 and England 2008. Taking these cases and the literature together, it is argued that features of the policy environment conspire to generate latent errors: 1) evolving policy and competing perspectives; 2) lack of role clarity and diffusion of responsibility and 3) timeframe slippage. Human error theory indicates that to try to reduce errors we must understand their fundamental causes and that these usually run deeper than the first stories that are told. Understanding the full reasons for particular systemic examination errors is difficult because politics is slippery, and many perspectives have to be sifted.

Keywords: Assessment, system, management, politics, policy

  • On different paradigms of educational assessment: Implications for the relationships with learning and teaching Jo-Anne Baird, in Vernon Wall Lecture /2017 pp.4
    DOI: 10.53841/bpsvern.2017.1.37.4
  • ‘Maybe I'm not as good as I think I am.’ How qualification users interpret their examination results Suzanne Chamberlain, in Educational Research /2012 pp.39
    DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2012.658198
  • The meaning of curriculum-related examination standards in Scotland and England: a home–international comparison Jo-Anne Baird, Lena Gray, in Oxford Review of Education /2016 pp.266
    DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2016.1184866

Jo-Anne Baird, Adrian Coxell, Policy, Latent Error and Systemic Examination Failures in "CADMO" 2/2009, pp 105-122, DOI: 10.3280/CAD2009-002011