Journal title PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO
Author/s Vitantonio Gioia
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/3 Language Italian
Pages 19 P. 91-109 File size 317 KB
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The current individualistic rhetoric conceals the dramatic impoverishment of the category of individualism, starting from the second half of nineteenth century. Individuals are only considered on the basis of their ability to produce and consume wealth, regardless of the social effects of their activities. So, while we look with admiration to the historical phases in which the individualization process contributed to the collapse of the old social systems, creating new models of social relationships, today a radical pessimism and disenchantment characterize the way in which we consider the possibilities of the contemporary individualism in order to change social world through a further development of human faculties. As a matter of fact, the univocal relationship between individual activities and acquisitive spirit, represented in exemplar way in the homo oeconomicus category, leads to exclusively conceive the contemporary individual as a subject of repetitive and routine activities within unchangeable social and economic contexts and not as potential builder of new models of social relationships. Coming back to the rich Enlightenment debate on the relationship between modern individualism and social changes can give significant stimuli for a rethinking of the category of individualism.
Keywords: Enlightenment, individualism, homo oeconomicus, liberalism and socialism, social changes.
Vitantonio Gioia, Individualismo e progresso sociale: contraddizioni reali e dilemmi fittizi in "PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO" 3/2013, pp 91-109, DOI: 10.3280/PACO2013-003005