Prospettive Internazionali - U.S. Medical Malpractice Mediation

Titolo Rivista SICUREZZA E SCIENZE SOCIALI
Autori/Curatori Janice F. Mulligan, Courtney L. Wine
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/1 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 16 P. 105-120 Dimensione file 131 KB
DOI 10.3280/SISS2017-001010
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This Article explores U.S. medical malpractice mediation. The authors delve into the ramifications of settling malpractice claims for physicians, which includes mandatory reporting to state medical boards as well as to the National Practitioners Data Bank, examine "consent-to-settle" clauses in professional liability insurance contracts, and conclude by determining that, overall, mediation is a great tool for all in medical malpractice lawsuits.

Keywords:Medico; practica illecita; mediazione; insediamento; obbligatorio

  1. Diederich Healthcare. “2013 Medical Malpratice Payout Analysis.” http://www.diederichhealthcare.com/the-standard/2013-medical-malpractice-payout-analysis/.
  2. Diederich Healthcare. “2016 Medical Malpratice Payout Analysis.” http://www.diederichhealthcare.com/the-standard/2016-medical-malpractice-payout-analysis/.
  3. Dyrda L. (2014). 12 Statistics on Medical Malpractice for Orthopedic, Neurosurgeons. Becker’s Spine Review. (Dec. 15) http://www.beckersspine.com/orthopedic-spinepractices-improving-profits/item/23658-12-statistics-on-medical-malpractice-for-orthopedicneurosurgeons.html
  4. Gamble M. (2013). “29 Statistics on Medical Malpractice Payouts and Lawsuits.” Becker’s Hospital Review. (May 3) http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal-regulatoryissues/29-statistics-on-medicaml-malpractice-payouts-and-lawsuits.html
  5. Greer T.E. (2009). Alternative dispute resolution in medical liability cases. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. (July 2009). http://www.aaos.org/news/aaosnow/jul09/managing7.asp
  6. Harming Patient Access to Care (2002). Implications of Excessive Litigation. Subcommittee on Health. Committee on Energy and Commerce, US House of Representatives. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
  7. Hyman C.S. (2010). Interest-based mediation of medical malpractice lawsuits: a route to improved patient safety. J. Health Polit. Policy Law, 35(5): 797–828.
  8. Jena A.B. et al. (2011). Malpratice Risk According to Physician Specialty. Engl. J. Med, n. 7: 629–636.
  9. Krauss M.I. (2014). The Puzzle of Medical Malpractice Payouts. Forbes. (Mar. 27). http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelkrauss/2014/03/27/the-puzzle-of-medical-malpracticepayouts/#1c0b9b78b218
  10. Liebman C.B. (2011). Medical Malpractice Mediation: Benefits Gained, Opportunities Lost. 136 Law and Contemporary Problems. Vol: 74, 135.
  11. Morreim H. (2011). Moral Hazard: The Pros and Cons of Avoiding Data Bank Reports. 266 Drexel Law Review Vo. 4 264, 265.
  12. Sohn D.H, Bal B.S. (2012). Medical Malpractice Reform: The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res, 470(5): 1370–78.
  13. Studdert D.M. et al. (2006). Errors, and Compensation Payments in Medical Malpractice Litigation. Engl. J. Med, n. 354: 2024–33.
  14. The Physician Insurers Association of America (2004). Claim Trend Analysis. Rockville, MD, USA.

Janice F. Mulligan, Courtney L. Wine, Prospettive Internazionali - U.S. Medical Malpractice Mediation in "SICUREZZA E SCIENZE SOCIALI" 1/2017, pp 105-120, DOI: 10.3280/SISS2017-001010