Social class and formal education: an analysis through technology

Journal title CADMO
Author/s Francesco Agrusti
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/2 Language Italian
Pages 12 P. 7-18 File size 198 KB
DOI 10.3280/CAD2020-002002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In 2020, in Italy, during the Covid-19 pandemic, the existence of two reali-ties became quite evident: one in which distance learning has been de¬veloped to its fullest potential; another, in which students were left to their own desti-ny and where it was not even possible to guarantee them the pos¬sibility of following video lessons synchronously. The main aim of this paper is to create a profile of the current technological situation of Italian didactics with the help of international surveys and reports, scientific studies and na¬tional reports data. After assessing the effects of educational technology on learning, it is presented an attempt to investigate the causes of technological and cultural change, looking for possible answers in the writings of Aldo Visalberghi. In conclusion, a comparison between distance learning and tra¬ditional education is proposed to better understand what happened to Italian education during the pandemic.

Keywords: Educational technology, influence of technology, distance education, digital divide

  1. Agasisti, T., Gil-Izquierdo, M., Han, S.W. (2017), ICT use at home for school-related tasks: What is the effect on a student’s achievement? Empirical evidence from OECD PISA data, MPRA Paper No. 81343, --
  2. Anzera G., Comunello F. (ed) (2005), Mondi digitali. Riflessioni e analisi sul digital divide. Milano: Guerini Associati.
  3. Aviram, A., Tami, D. (2006), “L’impatto delle tecnologie dell’informazione e della comunicazione sull’educazione”, Tecnologie Didattiche, 14 (2), pp. 30-51.
  4. Bentivegna, S. (2009), Disuguaglianze digitali; Le nuove forme di esclusione nella società d’informazione. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  5. Bianchini, V., Desiderio, A. (2001), “Atlante del divario digitale”, I quaderni speciali di Limes, supplemento al n. 1.
  6. Bissanti, G., Copello M. (2008), Il digital divide nelle campagne italiane. Roma: Digitaria.
  7. Calderaro, A. (2006), “Digital divide, l’informazione nelle dinamiche tecno-economiche”, InnovAzioni. Rivista di cultura politica, 6, gennaio-febbraio, pp. 100-104.
  8. Calvani, A. (2007), “ICT e scuola, un rapporto complesso. Come analizzarlo?”, Journal of e-Learning and knowledge Society, 3 (1), pp. 9-17.
  9. Calvani, A. (2009), “L’introduzione delle ICT nella scuola. Quale relazione? Un quadro di riferimento per una politica tecnologica”, Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 17 (3), pp. 9-14.
  10. Carbone, S. (2002), Digital divide: effetti della distribuzione irregolare dell’ICT. In Uckmar, V., Guandalini, M. (a cura di), Global Business 2003: guida ai trend dell’economia mondiale. Milano: ETAS. Carbone, S. (2004), Divario digitale: ICT e società della conoscenza. In Uckmar, V., Guandalini, M. (a cura di), Global Business 2003: guida ai trend dell’economia mondiale. Milano: ETAS.
  11. Carbone, S., Guandalini M. (2002), Vendo capre su Internet. Milano: ETAS.
  12. Castell, M. (1996), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  13. Castell, M. (2001), Internet Galaxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Cheung, A.C.K., Slavin, R.E. (2013), “The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis”, Educational Research Review, 9, pp. 88-113.
  15. Cowen, T. (2013), Average is over: Powering America beyond the age of the great stagnation. Londono: Penguin.
  16. De Witte, K., Rogge, N. (2014), “Does ICT matter for effectiveness and efficiency in mathematics education?”, Computers & Education, 75, pp. 173-184.
  17. Granieri, G. (2011), La società digitale. Roma-Bari, Laterza.
  18. Gui, M. (2009), Le competenze digitali. Le complesse capacità d’uso dei nuovi media e le disparità nel loro possesso. Napoli: Scriptaweb.
  19. Maragliano, R. (2005), “Tecnologia e saperi”, Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 13 (1), pp. 23-27.
  20. MIUR (2015), Studenti, computer e apprendimento: dati e riflessioni, --
  21. Morawski, P. (2001), “Il divario digitale ridisegna il pianeta”, I quaderni speciali di Limes.
  22. Norris, P. (2001), Digital divide. Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. OECD (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  24. OECD (2018). Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishin, --
  25. OECD (2019), TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I) Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  26. OECD (2019), TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II) Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  27. Olson, D.R. (1979), Linguaggi, media, e processi educativi, Scienze dell’Educazione 17. Torino: Loescher Editore.
  28. Parayil, G. (ed), Political Economy and Information Capitalism in India. Digital Divide, development and equity. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan;
  29. Prensky, M. (2001), “Digital natives, digital immigrants”, On the Horizon, 9 (5), pp. 1-6.
  30. Quintarelli, S. (2019), Capitalismo immateriale. Le tecnologie digitali e il nuovo conflitto sociale. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  31. Rampini, F. (2001), “Internet, la riscoperta del territorio”, I quaderni speciali di Limes, supplemento al n.1. Rothkopf, D. (1997), “In Praise of Cultural Imperialism?”, Foreign Policy, 107, pp. 38-53.
  32. Scalzi, N. (2016), “Scrittura a mano, nuove tecnologie, difficoltà di apprendimento. Intervista a Benedetto Vertecchi”, La vita scolastica, --
  33. Soldavini, P. (2016), “Il digitale innova a scuola. Ma non da solo”, Nòva. Il Sole 24 Ore, --
  34. Trucano, M. (2005), Knowledge Maps: ICTs in Education. Washington, DC: infoDev /World Ban --
  35. Visalberghi, A. (1968), “Per una scuola aperta al futuro”, Scuola e Città, XIX, 1, pp. 3-6.
  36. Visalberghi, A. (1976), “Tecnologie educative, socializzazione e formazione scienfica”, Scuola e Città, XXVII, 5-6, pp. 221-223.
  37. Visalberghi, A. (1984), “Informatica e tecnologie educative nella programmazione”, Scuola e Città, XXXV, 8, pp. 330-333.
  38. Wittwer, J., Senkbeil, M. (2008), “Is students’ computer use at home related to their mathematical performance at school?”, Computers & Education, 50 (4), pp. 1558-1571.

  • Indagine esplorativa sugli esami universitari a distanza Francesco Agrusti, Cristiano Corsini, in CADMO 1/2021 pp.63
    DOI: 10.3280/CAD2021-001005

Francesco Agrusti, Classe sociale e istruzione formale: una lettura attraverso le tecnologie in "CADMO" 2/2020, pp 7-18, DOI: 10.3280/CAD2020-002002