La partecipazione nella valutazione: cosa apprendere dalla sperimentazione del RAV per i Centri Provinciali per l’Istruzione degli Adulti

Journal title RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione
Author/s Graziana Epifani, Donatella Poliandri
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2022/83-84 Language Italian
Pages 19 P. 5-23 File size 237 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIV2022-083001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In Italy, the Presidential Decree 80/2013 established the Schools’ National Evaluation System. In 2018, INVALSI (project PON Valu.E ) launched an evaluation study to develop a Self-Evaluation Form for Provincial Centres for Adult Education (PCAE). The use of the partici-patory approach in the study involved the PCAEs, bringing out their needs and expectations, while ensuring full adherence to the process by all actors. This contribution presents the participatory exploration phase of the semantic field of the study aimed at defining the evaluation indicators and the self-evaluation form. The authors present the approach and discuss its implications. Finally, they reflect on the role that institution-al subjects can play in promoting a space of connection between the bearers of different points of view, creating synergies between central and local authorities in the field of evaluation.

Keywords: participatory evaluation; stakeholders; self-evaluation; adult education

  1. Bezzi C. (2001). Il disegno della ricerca valutativa. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Bezzi, C. (2003). Cosa valutiamo, esattamente? Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione, 27: 49-73. DOI: 10.1400/6652
  3. Bezzi C. (2010). Il nuovo disegno della ricerca valutativa. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  4. Blok, H., Sleegers, P., Karsten, S. (2005). Schoolzelfevaluatie in het basisonderwijs; een terugblik op de zelfevaluatiefase van Ziezo [School self-evaluation in primary education]. Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut.
  5. Capogna S. (2019). La valutazione come strumento di empowerment organizzativo e professionale. Rassegna italiana di valutazione, 70: 98-117. DOI: 10.3280/RIV2018-07000
  6. Chapman, C., Sammons, P. (2013). School Self-evaluation for School Improvement: What works and why? Berkshire: CfBT Education Trust.
  7. Choinuard J.A., Cousins, J.B. (2013). Participatory evaluation for development: Examining researchbased knowledge from within the African context. African Evaluation Journal, 1: 1-49.
  8. Colombo M., Poliandri D., Rinaldi E. E. (2020). Gli impatti dell’emergenza Covid-19 sul sistema scolastico-formativo in Italia. Scuola Democratica. Learning for Democracy, Early Access (16/06/2020). DOI: 10.12828/9709
  9. D.M. del 12/03/2015. Linee guida per il passaggio al nuovo ordinamento a sostegno dell’autonomia organizzativa e didattica dei Centri provinciali per l’istruzione degli adulti.
  10. D.P.R. n. 275 del 8/3/1999. Regolamento recante norme in materia di autonomia delle istituzioni scolastiche, ai sensi dell'art. 21 della legge 15 marzo 1997, n. 59.
  11. D.P.R. n. 80 del 28/03/2013. Regolamento sul sistema nazionale di valutazione in materia di istruzione e formazione.
  12. Ehren M.C.M., Janssen F.J.G., Brown M., McNamara G., O’Hara, J., Shevlin, P. (2017). Evaluation and decentralised governance: Examples of inspections in polycentric education systems. Journal of Educational Education, 1(3): 365–383.
  13. Ehren M.C.M, Visscher, A.J. (2008). The Relationship between School Inspections, School Characteristics and School Improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 2: 205-227.
  14. Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: University Press.
  15. House, E., Howe, K. (2000). Deliberative democratic evaluation. In: Ryan K.E., De Stefano L., a cura di, Evaluation as a democratic process, New Direction for Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (trad. it.: Valutazione democrazia deliberativa. In: Stame N., a cura di, Classici della valutazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 2007).
  16. Hoy W.K., Miskel C.G. (2001). Educational administration. Theory, research and practice (6th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  17. INVALSI (2017). Rapporto di Autovalutazione. GUIDA all’autovalutazione. Roma: INVALSI. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.invalsi.it/snv/docs/0220/Guida%20autovalutazione_2017.pdf
  18. INVALSI (2020). Poliandri, D., Epifani, G. (a cura di) Scoprire i Centri Provinciali per l’istruzione degli adulti: contesti, ambienti, processi. Dati dal questionario CPIA Valu.e e dal rapporto di valutazione. Roma: INVALSI. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.invalsi.it/value/docs/valueforrav/RAPPORTO_CPIA_VALU.E_feb20.pdf
  19. Janssens, F.J.G., van Amelsvoort G. H. W. C. H. (2008). School self-evaluation and school inspections in Europe: an exploratory study. Studies in Educational Evaluation 34: 15–23.
  20. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In Denzin N.K. and Lincoln Y. S., Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry Thousand. Oaks, CA: Sage.
  21. Legge n.59 del 15/3/1997. Delega al Governo per il conferimento di funzioni e compiti alle regioni ed enti locali, per la riforma della Pubblica Amministrazione e per la semplificazione amministrativa.
  22. MacDonald, B. (1976). Evaluation and the control of education. In D. Tawney D., Curriculum evaluation today: Trends and implications. London: Macmillan Education.
  23. McBeath, J. (1999). Schools must speak for themselves. London: Routledge.
  24. Mulford, B. (2005). Accountability policies and their effects. In: Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood, and D. Livingstone D., International handbook of educational policy. Dordrecht: Springer.
  25. Murray, R. (2002). Citizens’ Control of Evaluation. Formulating and Assessing Alternatives, Evaluation, 1: 81-100.
  26. Nevo, D. (2001). School evaluation: Internal or external? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27: 95–106.
  27. Niemi, H., Kemmis, S. (1999). Communicative evaluation: communication at
  28. crossroad. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 4: 55–64.
  29. OECD (2008). Education at a glance 2008. Paris: OECD.
  30. OECD (2013). Education at a glance 2013. Paris: OECD.
  31. Palumbo, M., Torrigiani, C. (2009). La partecipazione fra ricerca e valutazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  32. Palumbo, M., Congiu, D., Torrigiani, C. (2013). Participatory evaluation: who, what, why, how and when. Academia.EDU. -- Paper disponibile a: https://www.academia.edu/1623374/Participatory_evaluation_who_what_why_how_and_when
  33. Patton, M. Q. (2002). A vision of evaluation that strengthens democracy. Evaluation, 1:125-139. DOI: 10.1177/135890200200800174
  34. Ryan, E. K. (2004). Serving Public Interests in Educational Accountability: Alternative Approaches to democratic evaluation. AmericanJjournal of Evaluation, 25: 443-460.
  35. Scheerens, J., H.W.C.G. Van Amelsfoort and C. Donoughue (1999). Aspects of the organizational and political context of school evaluation in four European countries. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25: 79–108. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-491X(99)00015-
  36. Scheerens, J., Glas, C., Thomas, S.M. (2003). Educational Evaluation, Assessment and Monitoring: a Systemic Approach. London: Taylor & Francis.
  37. Scheerens, J. (2018). Efficacia e inefficacia educative. Esame critico della Knowledge Base. Dorchrect: Springer.
  38. Schildkamp, K. (2007). The utilisation of a self-evaluation instrument for primary education. Enschede: University of Twente.
  39. Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C. L., Handelzalts, A. (2016). Data teams for school improvement. School effectiveness and school improvement, 27(2), 228-254. DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2015.105619
  40. Vanhoof J., De Maeyer S., Van Petegem P. (2011). Variation in the conduct and the quality of self-evaluation: a multi-level path analysis. Educational studies 37: 277-287. DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2010.50632
  41. Vanhoof J., Van Petegem P. (2011). Designing and evaluation the process of school self-evaluations. Improving Schools, 14: 200-212. DOI: 10.1177/136548021140688
  42. Stame, N. (2016). Valutazione pluralista. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  43. Simons H. (2010). Democratic Evaluation:Theory and Practice. Virtual Evaluation Conference, Johannesburg, mimeo.
  44. Simons, H. (1987). Getting to know schools in a democracy: The politics and process of Evaluation. New York: Falmer.
  45. Sick, P., Shapiro, J. (1991). Utilizing participatory evaluation in a public-school setting: an assessment of teacher involvement in decision making. Paper presented at the 1991 Annual Meeeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Testo disponibile al sito: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED335771.pdf
  46. Shumer, R. (2015). Invited retrospective: The future of service-learning and community engagement research is mixed [methods]. In: Jagla V. M., Furco A. and Strait J. R., Service-learning pedagogy: How does it measure up? Charlotte, NC: Information Age. Testo disponibile al sito: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

Graziana Epifani, Donatella Poliandri, La partecipazione nella valutazione: cosa apprendere dalla sperimentazione del RAV per i Centri Provinciali per l’Istruzione degli Adulti in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 83-84/2022, pp 5-23, DOI: 10.3280/RIV2022-083001