Intersectional violence: obstetrician - gynecology

Author/s Giuseppina Cersosimo, Lucia Landolfi
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2023/3 Language Italian
Pages 14 P. 114-127 File size 190 KB
DOI 10.3280/SISS2023-003008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The paper showed obstetric violence as intersectional and institutionalization violence, often operated by sanitary professionals not only males but also females against other pregnant females. Through a qualitative approach, research showed the expressions of obstetrician violence perceived and lived by women: absence of information and pain therapy; absence of care, and abuse of own body and emo-tion.

Keywords: trust; information; abuse; pain; give birth; iatrogenia

  1. Antonelli F. (2016). La violenza ostetrica: ipotesi interpretative su una categoria in ascesa. Autonomie Locali e Servizi Sociali, 2: 265-280. DOI: 10.1447/84642
  2. Bichi R. (2007). La conduzione delle interviste nella ricerca sociale. Roma: Carocci.
  3. Bohren M.A., Mehrtash H., Fawole B., Maung T.M., Balde M.D., Maya E., Thwin S.S., Aderoba A.K., Vogel J.P., Irinyenikan T.A., Adeyanju A.O., Mon N.O., Adu-Bonsaffoh K., Landoulsi S., Guure C., Adanu R., Diallo B.A., Gülmezoglu A.M., Soumah A.M., Sall A.O., Tunçalp Ö. (2019). How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys. Lancet, 394 (10210), 1750-1763.
  4. Bohern M.A., Vogel J.P., Hunter E.C., Lutsiv O., Makh S.K., Souza J.P., Aguiar C., Saraiva Coneglian F., Diniz A.L., Tunçalp Ö., Javadi D., Oladapo O.T., Khosla R., Hindin M.J., Gülmezoglu A.M. (2015). The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-method systematic review. PLoS Medicine, vol. 12, n. 6, e1001847.
  5. Bryman A. (2016). Social Research methods, 5th ed.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Chadwick R. (2023). The Dangers of Minimizing Obstetric Violence. Violence Against Women, vol. 29, n. 9: 1899-1908. DOI: 10.1177/10778012211037379.
  7. Coffey A., Atkinson P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  8. Cohen Shabot S. (2021). On Motherhood as Ambiguity and Transcendence: Reevaluating Motherhood through the Beauvoirian Erotic. Comparative and Continental Philosophy, vol. 13, n. 3: 207-219,  DOI: 10.1080/17570638.2021.2002645
  9. Cohen Shabot S. (2016). Making loud bodies “Feminine”: A Feminist- Phenomenological Analysis of Obstetric Violence. Human Studies, 39: 231-247.
  10. Darilek U., (2018). A Woméns Right to Dignified Respectful Healthcare During Childbirth: A review of the literature on Obstetric Mistreatment. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, vol. 38, n. 6: 538-541. DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2017.1368752
  11. Freedman L.P., Kruk M.K. (2014). Disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: challenging the global quality and accountability agendas. Lancet, 384 (9948), e42-e44.
  12. Goh R., Goh D., Ellepola H. (2018). Perineal tears - A review. Australian Journal of General Practice, vol. 47, n. 1-2: 35-38. DOI: 10.31128/AFP-09-17-4333.
  13. Illich I. (1976), Nemnesi Medica. L’espropiazione della salute. Novara: Boroli Editore.
  14. Jewkes R., Penn-Kekana L. (2015). Mistreatment of Women in Childbirth: Time for Action on This Important Dimension of Violence against Women. PLoS Med, vol. 12, n. 6: e1001849.
  15. LaChance Adams S., Lundquist C.R. (2013). Coming to life. Philosophies of Pregnancy Childbirth, and Mothering, New York: Fordham University Press.
  16. Lou S., Hvidman L., Uldbjerg N., Neumann L., Jensen T.F., Haben J.G., Carstensen K. (2019). Women’s experiences of postterm induction of labor: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Birth, vol. 46, n. 3:400-410.
  17. Mena-Tudela D, Inglesias-Casá S., González-Chorda V.M., Cervera-Gasch Á., Andreu Pejó L., Valero-Chilleron M.J. (2020). Obstestric violence in Spain (part I): Womens’ perception and in territorial differences. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, n. 21 (7726).
  18. Reed R., Sharman R., Inglis C. (2017). Womens’ descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, vol. 17, n. 21.
  19. República Bolivariana de Venezuela (2007). Ley Orgánica sobre El Derecho e Las Mujeres a Una Vida Libre De Violencia. Gaceta Oficial de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela G.O. (38668 de 23/4/2007). .
  20. Sadler M., Santos M.J., Ruiz-Berdún D., Rojas G.L., Skoko E., Gillen P., Clausen J.A. (2016). Moving beyond respect and abuse: addressing the structural dimension of obstetric violence. Reproduction Health Matters 24: 47-55.
  21. Sakala C. (1993). Midwifery care and out-of-the-hospital birth settings. How do they reduce unnecessary cesarean section births?. Journal of Social Science of Medicine, vol. 37, n. 10: 1233-1250.
  22. World Health Organization (2014). The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. (Accessed March 2023) WHO_RHR_14.23_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1.

Giuseppina Cersosimo, Lucia Landolfi, Una violenza intersezionale: ostetrica-ginecologica in "SICUREZZA E SCIENZE SOCIALI" 3/2023, pp 114-127, DOI: 10.3280/SISS2023-003008