The philosophical thought about time and life sciences. An historical perspective

Journal title PARADIGMI
Author/s Emanuele Coco
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/2
Language Italian Pages 22 P. 155-176 File size 232 KB
DOI 10.3280/PARA2017-002011
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The analysis of some key moments in the relationship between natural history and history of philosophy seems to suggest that, during the early twentieth century, the life sciences have not made a "revolution" similar to the one that invested instead Physics generating the original suggestions by Bohr and Heisenberg on the objectivity of the phenomena and their possible determination. However, in more recent times, the reconsideration of the concepts of time and multiverse structure of the biological systems has opened up new scenarios. Theoretical and philosophical uses of these variables can help biology to emancipate itself from the deterministic view by which it has been often affected.

Keywords: Complementarity, Evolutionism, Nature, Philosophy, Reductionism, Time.

  1. Barsanti G. (1983). La mappa della vita. Teorie della natura e dell’uomo in Francia, 1750-1850. Napoli: Guida.
  2. Barsanti G. (1992). La scala, la mappa, l’albero. Firenze: Sansoni.
  3. Bondì R. e La Vergata A. (2014). Natura. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  4. Bonnet C. (1762). Considerations sur les corps organisés. Amsterdam: Marc-Michel Rey.
  5. Bonnet C. (1764). Contemplation de la nature. Amsterdam: Marc-Michel Rey.
  6. Capra F. and Luisi P. (2014). The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Coco E. (2008). Egoisti, malvagi e generosi. Storia naturale dell’altruismo. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
  8. Coniglione F. (2004). Introduzione alla filosofia della scienza. Un approccio storico. Acireale-Roma: Bonanno.
  9. Darwin C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray (1st edition).
  10. Franceschelli O. (2000). Eclissi di Dio e ritorno alla natura. Introduzione. In: Franceschelli O., a cura di. Dio, uomo e mondo nella metafisica da Cartesio a Nietzsche. Roma: Donzelli.
  11. Giordano G. (2006). Da Einstein a Morin. Filosofia e scienza tra due paradigmi. Roma: Rubettino.
  12. Giordano G. (2014). Freccia del tempo: il battesimo di un nome. Bollettino della Società Filosofica Italiana, 213, Nuova serie, settembre-dicembre: 15-26.
  13. Gould S.J. and Vrba E.S. (2008). Exaptation. Il bricolage dell’evoluzione. A cura di T. Pievani. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  14. Grafen A. (1982). How not to Measure Inclusive Fitness. Nature, 298: 425-426,
  15. La Mettrie J.O. de (1784). L’homme machine. Leyde. [citazione tratta dall’edizione F. Henry. Paris, 1865].
  16. Lamarck J.-B. (1801). Discours d’ouverture du Cours de Zoologie, donné dans le Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle l’an 8 de la République. In: Lamarck J.-B., Système des animaux sans vertèbres, ou Tableau général des classes, des ordres et des genres de ces animaux. Paris: Déterville.
  17. Lamarck J.-B. (1802). Recherches sur l’organisation des corps vivans et particulièrement sur son origine, sur la cause de ses développemens et des progrès de sa composition, et sur celle qui, tendant continuellement à la détruire dans chaque individu, amène nécessairement sa mort. Paris: Maillard.
  18. Lamarck J.-B. (1809). Philosophie zoologique, ou Exposition des considérations relatives à l’histoire naturelle des animaux. Paris: Dentu.
  19. Leibniz G.W. (1687). Extrait d’une Lettre de M.L. sur un Principe général, utile à l’explication des lois de la nature, par la consideration de la sagesse Divine, pour servir de réplique à la réponse du R.P.D. Malebranche. Nouvelles de la République des Lettres, mois de Mai, vol. 2: 744-753.
  20. Leibniz G.W. (1702). Letter to Varignon, with a Note on the “Justification of the Infinitesimal Calculus by that of Ordinary Algebra” In: Loemker L.E., ed. di. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Philosophical Papers and Letters, vol. 2, part IV: Springer Netherlands, 1989.
  21. Leibniz G.W. (1771). Fragment of a Letter to an Unknown Person, October 16, 1771 [originale in francese]. In: Langley, A.G., ed. New Essays Concerning Human Understanding by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, together with an Appen-dix Consisting of Some of his Shorter Pieces Translated from the Original Lat-in, French and German, with Notes by A.G. Langley. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1896.
  22. Lorenz K. (1941). Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie. Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie, 15: 94-125 (trad. it. Lorenz allo specchio. A cura di R.I. Evans. Roma: Armando Editore, 1977).
  23. Lorenz K. (1983). Der Abbau des Menschlichen. München: R. Piper & Co. Verlag (trad. it. Il declino dell’uomo. Milano: Mondadori, 1983).
  24. Löwith K. (1967). Gott, Mensch und Welt in der Metaphysik von Descartes bis zu Nietzsche. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (trad. it. Dio, uomo e mondo nella metafisica da Cartesio a Nietzsche. A cura di O. Franceschelli. Roma: Donzelli, 2000).
  25. Löwith K. (1969). Wozu Heute noch Philosophie? Der Spiegel, 43: 204-211.
  26. Maturana H. y Varela F. (1972). De máquinas y seres vivos. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria [citazioni tratte dalla edizione inglese Autopoiesis and Cognition. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1980].
  27. Mayr E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (trad. it.: Storia del pensiero biologico. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1990).
  28. Morgan T.H. (1909). Review: The Science and Philosophy of the Organism by H. Driesch. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 6, 4, Feb. 18: 101-105.
  29. Morgan T.H. et al. (1915). The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity. New York: Holt.
  30. Pomian K. (1984). L’ordre du temps. Paris: Gallimard.
  31. Prigogyne I. (1993). Time, Structure and Fluctuations. In: Sture Forsén S., ed., Nobel Lectures, Chemistry 1971-1980. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
  32. Slotten R.A. (2013). The Heretic in Darwin’s Court: The Life of Alfred Russel Wallace. New York: Columbia University Press.
  33. Trembley A. (1744). Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire d’un genre de polypes d’eau douce. Leyde: Jean & Herman Verbeek.
  34. Wallace A.R. (1870). The Limits of Natural Selection as Applied to Man. In: Wallace A.R., ed. Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection. A Series of Es-says. London: Macmillan: 332-371.
  35. Weiss J.-J. (1821). Voce Mettrie. In: Biographie universelle, ancienne et moderne, ou, Histoire par ordre alphabétique de la vie publique et privée de tous les hommes qui se sont fait remarquer par leurs écrits, leurs actions, leurs talents, leurs vertus ou leurs crimes. Paris: Chez L.G. Michaud, vol. 28: 474-478.
  36. Wright C. (1870). Limits of Natural Selection. North American Review, October 1870 (poi in Norton C.E, ed. Philosophical Discussions by Chauncey Wright. New York: Holt & Co., 1877).
  37. Wright C. (1873). Evolution of Self-Consciousness. North American Review, April: 245-310.

    Impossibile comunicare con Crossref: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. (doi.crossref.org:443)

Emanuele Coco, Il tempo nelle relazioni tra filosofia e biologia. Prospettive storiche attorno a una mancata rivoluzione in "PARADIGMI" 2/2017, pp 155-176, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2017-002011